This patch looks like it should be in the 3.8-stable tree, should we apply
it?
------------------
From: "Wei Yongjun <[email protected]>"
commit 06848c10f720cbc20e3b784c0df24930b7304b93 upstream
Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
case instead of 0, as returned elsewhere in this function.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Steffen Klassert <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <[email protected]>
---
net/ipv4/esp4.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/esp4.c b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
index 3b4f0cd..4cfe34d 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/esp4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
@@ -139,8 +139,6 @@ static int esp_output(struct xfrm_state *x, struct
sk_buff *skb)
/* skb is pure payload to encrypt */
- err = -ENOMEM;
-
esp = x->data;
aead = esp->aead;
alen = crypto_aead_authsize(aead);
@@ -176,8 +174,10 @@ static int esp_output(struct xfrm_state *x, struct
sk_buff *skb)
}
tmp = esp_alloc_tmp(aead, nfrags + sglists, seqhilen);
- if (!tmp)
+ if (!tmp) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
goto error;
+ }
seqhi = esp_tmp_seqhi(tmp);
iv = esp_tmp_iv(aead, tmp, seqhilen);
--
1.7.9.5
From: Jonghwan Choi <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 07:33:19 +0900
> This patch looks like it should be in the 3.8-stable tree, should we
> apply it?
It's in my networking -stable queue, I wish you would check it instead
of making more work for me replying to you to these kinds of emails.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/davem/stable/?state=*
Thanks.