2013-05-24 15:42:35

by Nicolas Ferre

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 3.10 #2

Arnd, Olof,

Second AT91 fixes pull-request for 3.10-rc. The PMC definition fix is the most
important of this batch.

Thanks, best regards,

The following changes since commit b7a8ca5173ef9aa55fa039d7c216426ff0b25a12:

ARM: at91: rm9200 fix time support (2013-05-15 12:37:45 +0200)

are available in the git repository at:

git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-fixes

for you to fetch changes up to 144ea15e4fefbee14a7dcb05c7cd0822fda3ebf6:

ARM: at91/sama5: fix incorrect PMC pcr div definition (2013-05-24 10:53:51 +0200)

----------------------------------------------------------------
One definition fix that can lead to mis-clock some
AT91 peripherals on SAMA5.
Two DT related fixes.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Boris BREZILLON (1):
ARM: at91/dt: fix macb pinctrl_macb_rmii_mii_alt definition

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (1):
ARM: at91: at91sam9n12: move external irq declatation to DT

Josh Wu (1):
ARM: at91/sama5: fix incorrect PMC pcr div definition

arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9260.dtsi | 2 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9n12.dtsi | 1 +
arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9n12.c | 6 ------
arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91_pmc.h | 6 +++---
4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--
Nicolas Ferre


2013-05-24 17:11:36

by Olof Johansson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 3.10 #2

Hi,

I'll pull this for now, but...


> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (1):
> ARM: at91: at91sam9n12: move external irq declatation to DT

This one is not a fix. While OK this time, please stick to only
sending true fixes for 3.10 from here on out.


-Olof

Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 3.10 #2

On 10:11 Fri 24 May , Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'll pull this for now, but...
>
>
> > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (1):
> > ARM: at91: at91sam9n12: move external irq declatation to DT
>
> This one is not a fix. While OK this time, please stick to only
> sending true fixes for 3.10 from here on out.

it's as you must specify them via DT, the C code is not event use in case of
DT
I should have put fix in the commit

Best Regards,
J.
>
>
> -Olof
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

2013-05-24 17:25:47

by Olof Johansson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 3.10 #2

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10:11 Fri 24 May , Olof Johansson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'll pull this for now, but...
>>
>>
>> > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (1):
>> > ARM: at91: at91sam9n12: move external irq declatation to DT
>>
>> This one is not a fix. While OK this time, please stick to only
>> sending true fixes for 3.10 from here on out.
>
> it's as you must specify them via DT, the C code is not event use in case of
> DT
> I should have put fix in the commit
>

I don't understand.


-Olof

Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 3.10 #2

On 10:25 Fri 24 May , Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 10:11 Fri 24 May , Olof Johansson wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'll pull this for now, but...
> >>
> >>
> >> > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (1):
> >> > ARM: at91: at91sam9n12: move external irq declatation to DT
> >>
> >> This one is not a fix. While OK this time, please stick to only
> >> sending true fixes for 3.10 from here on out.
> >
> > it's as you must specify them via DT, the C code is not event use in case of
> > DT
> > I should have put fix in the commit
> >
>
> I don't understand.

for DT SoC you must use dt to descrive the external irq on at91 now
the sam9n12 (dt-only soc) was not converted when we did it

this commit fix it

Best Regards,
J.