Mark it so.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
---
MAINTAINERS | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index e61c2e8..a386a22 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -4414,7 +4414,7 @@ F: arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c
INTEL WIRELESS WIMAX CONNECTION 2400
M: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <[email protected]>
M: [email protected]
-L: [email protected]
+L: [email protected] (subscribers-only)
S: Supported
W: http://linuxwimax.org
F: Documentation/wimax/README.i2400m
@@ -9225,7 +9225,7 @@ F: drivers/media/rc/winbond-cir.c
WIMAX STACK
M: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <[email protected]>
M: [email protected]
-L: [email protected]
+L: [email protected] (subscribers-only)
S: Supported
W: http://linuxwimax.org
F: Documentation/wimax/README.wimax
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:54:52PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Mark it so.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index e61c2e8..a386a22 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -4414,7 +4414,7 @@ F: arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c
> INTEL WIRELESS WIMAX CONNECTION 2400
> M: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <[email protected]>
> M: [email protected]
> -L: [email protected]
> +L: [email protected] (subscribers-only)
> S: Supported
> W: http://linuxwimax.org
> F: Documentation/wimax/README.i2400m
> @@ -9225,7 +9225,7 @@ F: drivers/media/rc/winbond-cir.c
> WIMAX STACK
> M: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <[email protected]>
> M: [email protected]
> -L: [email protected]
> +L: [email protected] (subscribers-only)
> S: Supported
> W: http://linuxwimax.org
> F: Documentation/wimax/README.wimax
The W: link is dead.
Given wimax never really took off, is there any point in keeping this in the kernel at all ?
We turned off the drivers in Fedora a while ago, and just threw out the userspace parts.
I wouldn't be surprised to learn of other distributions doing the same.
Dave
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 16:09 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:54:52PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Mark it so.
[]
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
[]
> > @@ -4414,7 +4414,7 @@ F: arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c
> > INTEL WIRELESS WIMAX CONNECTION 2400
> > M: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <[email protected]>
> > M: [email protected]
> > -L: [email protected]
> > +L: [email protected] (subscribers-only)
> > S: Supported
> > W: http://linuxwimax.org
> > F: Documentation/wimax/README.i2400m
> > @@ -9225,7 +9225,7 @@ F: drivers/media/rc/winbond-cir.c
> > WIMAX STACK
> > M: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <[email protected]>
> > M: [email protected]
> > -L: [email protected]
> > +L: [email protected] (subscribers-only)
> > S: Supported
> > W: http://linuxwimax.org
> > F: Documentation/wimax/README.wimax
>
> The W: link is dead.
>
> Given wimax never really took off, is there any point in keeping this in the kernel at all ?
> We turned off the drivers in Fedora a while ago, and just threw out the userspace parts.
> I wouldn't be surprised to learn of other distributions doing the same.
Inaky?
Are you doing any work on this at all?
Should this be deleted?
> From: Joe Perches [mailto:[email protected]]
> >
> > The W: link is dead.
> >
> > Given wimax never really took off, is there any point in keeping this in the kernel at all ?
> > We turned off the drivers in Fedora a while ago, and just threw out the userspace parts.
> > I wouldn't be surprised to learn of other distributions doing the same.
>
> Inaky?
> Are you doing any work on this at all?
> Should this be deleted?
I do minimal maintenance, which in the last two years has been close to zero.
I do get, however, occasional support requests (serviced as time permits) from
South America and Russia, which makes me think they use it. How much, I don't
know.
Unless it is a pain, I'd keep it there
On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 18:11 +0000, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote:
> > From: Joe Perches [mailto:[email protected]]
> > >
> > > The W: link is dead.
> > >
> > > Given wimax never really took off, is there any point in keeping this in the kernel at all ?
> > > We turned off the drivers in Fedora a while ago, and just threw out the userspace parts.
> > > I wouldn't be surprised to learn of other distributions doing the same.
> >
> > Inaky?
> > Are you doing any work on this at all?
> > Should this be deleted?
>
> I do minimal maintenance, which in the last two years has been close to zero.
>
> I do get, however, occasional support requests (serviced as time permits) from
> South America and Russia, which makes me think they use it. How much, I don't
> know.
>
> Unless it is a pain, I'd keep it there
I think you should take the initial MAINTAINERS patch
that marks the mailing lists as subscribers-only.
I don't subscribe and got useless bounces.
> From: Joe Perches [mailto:[email protected]]
>
> On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 18:11 +0000, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote:
> > > From: Joe Perches [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > >
> > > > The W: link is dead.
> > > >
> > > > Given wimax never really took off, is there any point in keeping this in
> the kernel at all ?
> > > > We turned off the drivers in Fedora a while ago, and just threw out the
> userspace parts.
> > > > I wouldn't be surprised to learn of other distributions doing the same.
> > >
> > > Inaky?
> > > Are you doing any work on this at all?
> > > Should this be deleted?
> >
> > I do minimal maintenance, which in the last two years has been close to
> zero.
> >
> > I do get, however, occasional support requests (serviced as time
> > permits) from South America and Russia, which makes me think they use
> > it. How much, I don't know.
> >
> > Unless it is a pain, I'd keep it there
>
> I think you should take the initial MAINTAINERS patch that marks the mailing
> lists as subscribers-only.
>
> I don't subscribe and got useless bounces.
ACK--do I need to do it and can the patch go straight to the tree?