2014-01-03 00:47:39

by Prarit Bhargava

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] x86: Add check for number of available vectors before CPU down [v4]

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64791

When a cpu is downed on a system, the irqs on the cpu are assigned to
other cpus. It is possible, however, that when a cpu is downed there
aren't enough free vectors on the remaining cpus to account for the
vectors from the cpu that is being downed.

This results in an interesting "overflow" condition where irqs are
"assigned" to a CPU but are not handled.

For example, when downing cpus on a 1-64 logical processor system:

<snip>
[ 232.021745] smpboot: CPU 61 is now offline
[ 238.480275] smpboot: CPU 62 is now offline
[ 245.991080] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 245.996270] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at net/sched/sch_generic.c:264 dev_watchdog+0x246/0x250()
[ 246.005688] NETDEV WATCHDOG: p786p1 (ixgbe): transmit queue 0 timed out
[ 246.013070] Modules linked in: lockd sunrpc iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support sb_edac ixgbe microcode e1000e pcspkr joydev edac_core lpc_ich ioatdma ptp mdio mfd_core i2c_i801 dca pps_core i2c_core wmi acpi_cpufreq isci libsas scsi_transport_sas
[ 246.037633] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.12.0+ #14
[ 246.044451] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S4600LH ........../SVRBD-ROW_T, BIOS SE5C600.86B.01.08.0003.022620131521 02/26/2013
[ 246.057371] 0000000000000009 ffff88081fa03d40 ffffffff8164fbf6 ffff88081fa0ee48
[ 246.065728] ffff88081fa03d90 ffff88081fa03d80 ffffffff81054ecc ffff88081fa13040
[ 246.074073] 0000000000000000 ffff88200cce0000 0000000000000040 0000000000000000
[ 246.082430] Call Trace:
[ 246.085174] <IRQ> [<ffffffff8164fbf6>] dump_stack+0x46/0x58
[ 246.091633] [<ffffffff81054ecc>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0
[ 246.098352] [<ffffffff81054fb6>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
[ 246.104786] [<ffffffff815710d6>] dev_watchdog+0x246/0x250
[ 246.110923] [<ffffffff81570e90>] ? dev_deactivate_queue.constprop.31+0x80/0x80
[ 246.119097] [<ffffffff8106092a>] call_timer_fn+0x3a/0x110
[ 246.125224] [<ffffffff8106280f>] ? update_process_times+0x6f/0x80
[ 246.132137] [<ffffffff81570e90>] ? dev_deactivate_queue.constprop.31+0x80/0x80
[ 246.140308] [<ffffffff81061db0>] run_timer_softirq+0x1f0/0x2a0
[ 246.146933] [<ffffffff81059a80>] __do_softirq+0xe0/0x220
[ 246.152976] [<ffffffff8165fedc>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
[ 246.158920] [<ffffffff810045f5>] do_softirq+0x55/0x90
[ 246.164670] [<ffffffff81059d35>] irq_exit+0xa5/0xb0
[ 246.170227] [<ffffffff8166062a>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x4a/0x60
[ 246.177324] [<ffffffff8165f40a>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6a/0x70
[ 246.184041] <EOI> [<ffffffff81505a1b>] ? cpuidle_enter_state+0x5b/0xe0
[ 246.191559] [<ffffffff81505a17>] ? cpuidle_enter_state+0x57/0xe0
[ 246.198374] [<ffffffff81505b5d>] cpuidle_idle_call+0xbd/0x200
[ 246.204900] [<ffffffff8100b7ae>] arch_cpu_idle+0xe/0x30
[ 246.210846] [<ffffffff810a47b0>] cpu_startup_entry+0xd0/0x250
[ 246.217371] [<ffffffff81646b47>] rest_init+0x77/0x80
[ 246.223028] [<ffffffff81d09e8e>] start_kernel+0x3ee/0x3fb
[ 246.229165] [<ffffffff81d0989f>] ? repair_env_string+0x5e/0x5e
[ 246.235787] [<ffffffff81d095a5>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c
[ 246.242990] [<ffffffff81d0969f>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xf8/0xfc
[ 246.249610] ---[ end trace fb74fdef54d79039 ]---
[ 246.254807] ixgbe 0000:c2:00.0 p786p1: initiating reset due to tx timeout
[ 246.262489] ixgbe 0000:c2:00.0 p786p1: Reset adapter
Last login: Mon Nov 11 08:35:14 from 10.18.17.119
[root@(none) ~]# [ 246.792676] ixgbe 0000:c2:00.0 p786p1: detected SFP+: 5
[ 249.231598] ixgbe 0000:c2:00.0 p786p1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX
[ 246.792676] ixgbe 0000:c2:00.0 p786p1: detected SFP+: 5
[ 249.231598] ixgbe 0000:c2:00.0 p786p1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: RX/TX

(last lines keep repeating. ixgbe driver is dead until module reload.)

If the downed cpu has more vectors than are free on the remaining cpus on the
system, it is possible that some vectors are "orphaned" even though they are
assigned to a cpu. In this case, since the ixgbe driver had a watchdog, the
watchdog fired and notified that something was wrong.

This patch adds a function, check_vectors(), to compare the number of vectors
on the CPU going down and compares it to the number of vectors available on
the system. If there aren't enough vectors for the CPU to go down, an
error is returned and propogated back to userspace.

Tested on both -tip and current linux.git.

v2: Do not need to look at percpu irqs
v3: Need to check affinity to prevent counting of MSIs in IOAPIC Lowest
Priority Mode
v4: Additional changes suggested by Gong Chen.

Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <[email protected]>
Cc: Seiji Aguchi <[email protected]>
Cc: Yang Zhang <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
Cc: Janet Morgan <[email protected]>
Cc: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Cc: Ruiv Wang <[email protected]>
Cc: Gong Chen <[email protected]>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
---
arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 6 +++++
3 files changed, 63 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h
index 0ea10f27..cb6cfcd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ extern void irq_ctx_init(int cpu);

#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
+extern int check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable(void);
extern void fixup_irqs(void);
extern void irq_force_complete_move(int);
#endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
index 22d0687..8a2e470 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -262,6 +262,62 @@ __visible void smp_trace_x86_platform_ipi(struct pt_regs *regs)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vector_used_by_percpu_irq);

#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
+/*
+ * This cpu is going to be removed and its vectors migrated to the remaining
+ * online cpus. Check to see if there are enough vectors in the remaining cpus.
+ */
+int check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable(void)
+{
+ int irq, cpu;
+ unsigned int vector, this_count, count;
+ struct irq_desc *desc;
+ struct irq_data *data;
+ struct cpumask affinity_new, online_new;
+
+ cpumask_copy(&online_new, cpu_online_mask);
+ cpu_clear(smp_processor_id(), online_new);
+
+ this_count = 0;
+ for (vector = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR; vector < NR_VECTORS; vector++) {
+ irq = __this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]);
+ if (irq >= 0) {
+ desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
+ data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
+ cpumask_copy(&affinity_new, data->affinity);
+ cpu_clear(smp_processor_id(), affinity_new);
+ /*
+ * Only count active non-percpu irqs, and those
+ * irqs that are not linked to on an online cpu; in
+ * fixup_irqs(), chip->irq_set_affinity() will be
+ * called which will set vector_irq[irq] for each
+ * cpu.
+ */
+ if (irq_has_action(irq) && !irqd_is_per_cpu(data) &&
+ (cpumask_empty(&affinity_new) ||
+ !cpumask_subset(&affinity_new, &online_new)))
+ this_count++;
+ }
+ }
+
+ count = 0;
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ if (cpu == smp_processor_id())
+ continue;
+ for (vector = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR; vector < NR_VECTORS;
+ vector++) {
+ if (per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[vector] < 0)
+ count++;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (count < this_count) {
+ pr_warn("CPU %d disable failed: CPU has %u vectors assigned and there are only %u available.\n",
+ smp_processor_id(), this_count, count);
+ return -ERANGE;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
/* A cpu has been removed from cpu_online_mask. Reset irq affinities. */
void fixup_irqs(void)
{
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 85dc05a..391ea52 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -1312,6 +1312,12 @@ void cpu_disable_common(void)

int native_cpu_disable(void)
{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable();
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
clear_local_APIC();

cpu_disable_common();
--
1.7.9.3


2014-01-03 02:44:56

by Chen, Gong

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Add check for number of available vectors before CPU down [v4]

Add some nitpicks below.

Reviewed-by: Chen, Gong <[email protected]>

On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 07:47:24PM -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> +int check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable(void)
> +{
> + int irq, cpu;
> + unsigned int vector, this_count, count;
> + struct irq_desc *desc;
> + struct irq_data *data;
> + struct cpumask affinity_new, online_new;
> +
> + cpumask_copy(&online_new, cpu_online_mask);
> + cpu_clear(smp_processor_id(), online_new);
I notice that you use smp_processor_id() many times. Maybe we can
save it first for speed.

> +
> + this_count = 0;
> + for (vector = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR; vector < NR_VECTORS; vector++) {
> + irq = __this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]);
> + if (irq >= 0) {
> + desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> + data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> + cpumask_copy(&affinity_new, data->affinity);
> + cpu_clear(smp_processor_id(), affinity_new);
> + /*
> + * Only count active non-percpu irqs, and those
> + * irqs that are not linked to on an online cpu; in
> + * fixup_irqs(), chip->irq_set_affinity() will be
> + * called which will set vector_irq[irq] for each
> + * cpu.
> + */
> + if (irq_has_action(irq) && !irqd_is_per_cpu(data) &&
> + (cpumask_empty(&affinity_new) ||
> + !cpumask_subset(&affinity_new, &online_new)))
> + this_count++;
Would you please add some extra comments to describe these two different
conditions that cpumask is empty and non-empty. I feel it is a little bit
sutble and I don't expect I'm confused by myself one day :-).


Attachments:
(No filename) (1.50 kB)
signature.asc (836.00 B)
Digital signature
Download all attachments