On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:07:35PM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've a bunch of Intel MID patches under review but it seems they are becoming
> old and start to need changes.
> I gathered an up-to-date version of all of them in this single patch set.
>
> This series implements support of Clovertrail and Merrifield to Intel MID.
> It also removes the unwanted X86_MDFLD option since *all* Intel MID platforms
> should be supported through CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MID option.
>
> This makes obsolete the following patches:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/18/480
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/22/533
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1311.1/02937.html
Ping :)
Any comments on this whole patch set?
Br, David Cohen
>
> Br, David
>
> ---
> David Cohen (3):
> x86: intel-mid: move Medfield code out of intel-mid.c core file
> x86: intel-mid: add Merrifield platform support
> x86: intel-mid: remove deprecated X86_MDFLD and X86_WANT_INTEL_MID
> configs
>
> Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan (1):
> x86: intel-mid: add Clovertrail platform support
>
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 29 +-----
> arch/x86/include/asm/intel-mid.h | 48 +++++++++-
> arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c | 6 +-
> arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/Makefile | 4 +-
> arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel-mid.c | 64 +++++++------
> arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_weak_decls.h | 19 ++++
> arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/mfld.c | 75 +++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/mrfl.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/sfi.c | 34 +++++--
> 9 files changed, 317 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_weak_decls.h
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/mfld.c
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/mrfl.c
>
> --
> 1.8.4.2
On 01/14/2014 02:44 PM, David Cohen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:07:35PM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've a bunch of Intel MID patches under review but it seems they are becoming
>> old and start to need changes.
>> I gathered an up-to-date version of all of them in this single patch set.
>>
>> This series implements support of Clovertrail and Merrifield to Intel MID.
>> It also removes the unwanted X86_MDFLD option since *all* Intel MID platforms
>> should be supported through CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MID option.
>>
>> This makes obsolete the following patches:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/18/480
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/22/533
>> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1311.1/02937.html
>
> Ping :)
> Any comments on this whole patch set?
>
You got some feedback from Bjorn and Ingo... mostly description-related,
but that is important enough.
Other than that we should queue it up ASAP.
-hpa
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 03:52:01PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 01/14/2014 02:44 PM, David Cohen wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 12:07:35PM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've a bunch of Intel MID patches under review but it seems they are becoming
> >> old and start to need changes.
> >> I gathered an up-to-date version of all of them in this single patch set.
> >>
> >> This series implements support of Clovertrail and Merrifield to Intel MID.
> >> It also removes the unwanted X86_MDFLD option since *all* Intel MID platforms
> >> should be supported through CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MID option.
> >>
> >> This makes obsolete the following patches:
> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/18/480
> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/22/533
> >> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1311.1/02937.html
> >
> > Ping :)
> > Any comments on this whole patch set?
> >
>
> You got some feedback from Bjorn and Ingo... mostly description-related,
> but that is important enough.
Hm. I believe I sent new patch versions based on those comments. But I
guess I failed to spot my new patches were my reply :(
Br, David
>
> Other than that we should queue it up ASAP.
>
> -hpa
>