From: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
There isn't an explicit stolen memory base register on gen2.
Some old comment in the i915 code suggests we should get it via
max_low_pfn_mapped, but that's clearly a bad idea on my MGM.
The e820 map in said machine looks like this:
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009f7ff] usable
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000000009f800-0x000000000009ffff] reserved
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000ce000-0x00000000000cffff] reserved
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000000dc000-0x00000000000fffff] reserved
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x000000001f6effff] usable
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f0000-0x000000001f6f7fff] ACPI data
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f6f8000-0x000000001f6fffff] ACPI NVS
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x000000001f700000-0x000000001fffffff] reserved
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fec10000-0x00000000fec1ffff] reserved
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000ffb00000-0x00000000ffbfffff] reserved
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000fff00000-0x00000000ffffffff] reserved
That makes max_low_pfn_mapped = 1f6f0000, so assuming our stolen memory
would start there would place it on top of some ACPI memory regions.
So not a good idea as already stated.
The 9MB region after the ACPI regions at 0x1f700000 however looks
promising given that the macine reports the stolen memory size to be
8MB. Looking at the PGTBL_CTL register, the GTT entries are at offset
0x1fee00000, and given that the GTT entries occupy 128KB, it looks like
the stolen memory could start at 0x1f700000 and the GTT entries would
occupy the last 128KB of the stolen memory.
After some more digging through chipset documentation, I've determined
the BIOS first allocates space for something called TSEG (something to
do with SMM) from the top of memory, and then it allocates the graphics
stolen memory below that. Accordind to the chipset documentation TSEG
has a fixed size of 1MB on 855. So that explains the top 1MB in the
e820 region. And it also confirms that the GTT entries are in fact at
the end of the the stolen memory region.
Derive the stolen memory base address on gen2 the same as the BIOS does
(TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size). There are a few differences between the
registers on various gen2 chipsets, so a few different codepaths are
required.
865G is again bit more special since it seems to support enough memory
to hit 4GB address space issues. This means the PCI allocations will
also affect the location of the stolen memory. Fortunately there
appears to be the TOUD register which may give us the correct answer
directly. But the chipset docs are a bit unclear, so I'm not 100%
sure that the graphics stolen memory is always the last thing the
BIOS steals. Someone would need to verify it on a real system.
I tested this on the my 830 and 855 machines, and so far everything
looks peachy.
v2: Rewrite to use the TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size and TOUD methods
v3: Fix TSEG size for 830
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c | 132 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/drm/i915_drm.h | 20 +++++++
2 files changed, 152 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
index fddd4d0..5218dd2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
@@ -247,6 +247,114 @@ static u32 __init intel_stolen_base(int num, int slot, int func, size_t stolen_s
#define MB(x) (KB (KB (x)))
#define GB(x) (MB (KB (x)))
+static size_t __init i830_tseg_size(void)
+{
+ u8 tmp = read_pci_config_byte(0, 0, 0, I830_ESMRAMC);
+
+ if (!(tmp & TSEG_ENABLE))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (tmp & I830_TSEG_SIZE_1M)
+ return MB(1);
+ else
+ return KB(512);
+}
+
+static size_t __init i845_tseg_size(void)
+{
+ u8 tmp = read_pci_config_byte(0, 0, 0, I845_ESMRAMC);
+
+ if (!(tmp & TSEG_ENABLE))
+ return 0;
+
+ switch (tmp & I845_TSEG_SIZE_MASK) {
+ case I845_TSEG_SIZE_512K:
+ return KB(512);
+ case I845_TSEG_SIZE_1M:
+ return MB(1);
+ default:
+ WARN_ON(1);
+ return 0;
+ }
+}
+
+static size_t __init i85x_tseg_size(void)
+{
+ u8 tmp = read_pci_config_byte(0, 0, 0, I85X_ESMRAMC);
+
+ if (!(tmp & TSEG_ENABLE))
+ return 0;
+
+ return MB(1);
+}
+
+static size_t __init i830_mem_size(void)
+{
+ return read_pci_config_byte(0, 0, 0, I830_DRB3) * MB(32);
+}
+
+static size_t __init i85x_mem_size(void)
+{
+ return read_pci_config_byte(0, 0, 1, I85X_DRB3) * MB(32);
+}
+
+/*
+ * On 830/845/85x the stolen memory base isn't available in any
+ * register. We need to calculate it as TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size.
+ */
+static u32 __init i830_stolen_base(int num, int slot, int func, size_t stolen_size)
+{
+ return i830_mem_size() - i830_tseg_size() - stolen_size;
+}
+
+static u32 __init i845_stolen_base(int num, int slot, int func, size_t stolen_size)
+{
+ return i830_mem_size() - i845_tseg_size() - stolen_size;
+}
+
+static u32 __init i85x_stolen_base(int num, int slot, int func, size_t stolen_size)
+{
+ return i85x_mem_size() - i85x_tseg_size() - stolen_size;
+}
+
+static u32 __init i865_stolen_base(int num, int slot, int func, size_t stolen_size)
+{
+ /*
+ * FIXME is the graphics stolen memory region
+ * always at TOUD? Ie. is it always the last
+ * one to be allocated by the BIOS?
+ */
+ return read_pci_config_16(0, 0, 0, I865_TOUD) << 16;
+}
+
+static size_t __init i830_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
+{
+ size_t stolen_size;
+ u16 gmch_ctrl;
+
+ gmch_ctrl = read_pci_config_16(0, 0, 0, I830_GMCH_CTRL);
+
+ switch (gmch_ctrl & I830_GMCH_GMS_MASK) {
+ case I830_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_512:
+ stolen_size = KB(512);
+ break;
+ case I830_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_1024:
+ stolen_size = MB(1);
+ break;
+ case I830_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_8192:
+ stolen_size = MB(8);
+ break;
+ case I830_GMCH_GMS_LOCAL:
+ /* local memory isn't part of the normal address space */
+ stolen_size = 0;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return stolen_size;
+}
+
static size_t __init gen3_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
{
size_t stolen_size;
@@ -329,6 +437,26 @@ struct intel_stolen_funcs {
u32 (*base)(int num, int slot, int func, size_t size);
};
+static const struct intel_stolen_funcs i830_stolen_funcs = {
+ .base = i830_stolen_base,
+ .size = i830_stolen_size,
+};
+
+static const struct intel_stolen_funcs i845_stolen_funcs = {
+ .base = i845_stolen_base,
+ .size = i830_stolen_size,
+};
+
+static const struct intel_stolen_funcs i85x_stolen_funcs = {
+ .base = i85x_stolen_base,
+ .size = gen3_stolen_size,
+};
+
+static const struct intel_stolen_funcs i865_stolen_funcs = {
+ .base = i865_stolen_base,
+ .size = gen3_stolen_size,
+};
+
static const struct intel_stolen_funcs gen3_stolen_funcs = {
.base = intel_stolen_base,
.size = gen3_stolen_size,
@@ -345,6 +473,10 @@ static const struct intel_stolen_funcs gen8_stolen_funcs = {
};
static struct pci_device_id intel_stolen_ids[] __initdata = {
+ INTEL_I830_IDS(&i830_stolen_funcs),
+ INTEL_I845G_IDS(&i845_stolen_funcs),
+ INTEL_I85X_IDS(&i85x_stolen_funcs),
+ INTEL_I865G_IDS(&i865_stolen_funcs),
INTEL_I915G_IDS(&gen3_stolen_funcs),
INTEL_I915GM_IDS(&gen3_stolen_funcs),
INTEL_I945G_IDS(&gen3_stolen_funcs),
diff --git a/include/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/drm/i915_drm.h
index 97d5497..595f85c 100644
--- a/include/drm/i915_drm.h
+++ b/include/drm/i915_drm.h
@@ -56,6 +56,12 @@ extern bool i915_gpu_turbo_disable(void);
#define I830_GMCH_CTRL 0x52
+#define I830_GMCH_GMS_MASK 0x70
+#define I830_GMCH_GMS_LOCAL 0x10
+#define I830_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_512 0x20
+#define I830_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_1024 0x30
+#define I830_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_8192 0x40
+
#define I855_GMCH_GMS_MASK 0xF0
#define I855_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_0M 0x0
#define I855_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_1M (0x1 << 4)
@@ -72,4 +78,18 @@ extern bool i915_gpu_turbo_disable(void);
#define INTEL_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_224M (0xc << 4)
#define INTEL_GMCH_GMS_STOLEN_352M (0xd << 4)
+#define I830_DRB3 0x63
+#define I85X_DRB3 0x43
+#define I865_TOUD 0xc4
+
+#define I830_ESMRAMC 0x91
+#define I845_ESMRAMC 0x9e
+#define I85X_ESMRAMC 0x61
+#define TSEG_ENABLE (1 << 0)
+#define I830_TSEG_SIZE_512K (0 << 1)
+#define I830_TSEG_SIZE_1M (1 << 1)
+#define I845_TSEG_SIZE_MASK (3 << 1)
+#define I845_TSEG_SIZE_512K (2 << 1)
+#define I845_TSEG_SIZE_1M (3 << 1)
+
#endif /* _I915_DRM_H_ */
--
1.8.3.2
Hi x86 folks,
Ping on getting the gen2 stolen memory early quirk patches into the x86
tree.
>From our side Daniel and Chris both seemed happy with them, so I'd like
to get them in at some point.
--
Ville Syrj?l?
Intel OTC
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 02:47:07PM +0200, Ville Syrj?l? wrote:
> Hi x86 folks,
>
> Ping on getting the gen2 stolen memory early quirk patches into the x86
> tree.
>
> From our side Daniel and Chris both seemed happy with them, so I'd like
> to get them in at some point.
Yup, I think this is ready for 3.15. And since there's no direct depency
really between the i915 parts and the x86 early reserve stuff they can go
both in through relevant trees - i915 will simply fail the stolen setup if
the range isn't properly reserved.
A stable branch somewhere would be good though so that I can pull it into
our integration tree for testing.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
* Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 02:47:07PM +0200, Ville Syrj?l? wrote:
> > Hi x86 folks,
> >
> > Ping on getting the gen2 stolen memory early quirk patches into
> > the x86 tree.
> >
> > From our side Daniel and Chris both seemed happy with them, so I'd
> > like to get them in at some point.
>
> Yup, I think this is ready for 3.15. And since there's no direct
> depency really between the i915 parts and the x86 early reserve
> stuff they can go both in through relevant trees - i915 will simply
> fail the stolen setup if the range isn't properly reserved.
>
> A stable branch somewhere would be good though so that I can pull it
> into our integration tree for testing.
Please post the x86 bits separately in a standalone series, if they
can and should be applied standalone.
Thanks,
Ingo