2014-02-19 10:13:42

by Alexander Gordeev

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] ntb: Use pci_enable_msix_range() instead of pci_enable_msix()

As result of deprecation of MSI-X/MSI enablement functions
pci_enable_msix() and pci_enable_msi_block() all drivers
using these two interfaces need to be updated to use the
new pci_enable_msi_range() and pci_enable_msix_range()
interfaces.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <[email protected]>
Cc: Jon Mason <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
---
drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++---------------------------
drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h | 2 --
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
index 170e8e6..fda37eb 100644
--- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
@@ -1085,21 +1085,15 @@ static int ntb_setup_msix(struct ntb_device *ndev)
struct msix_entry *msix;
int msix_entries;
int rc, i;
- u16 val;

- if (!pdev->msix_cap) {
- rc = -EIO;
- goto err;
- }
-
- rc = pci_read_config_word(pdev, pdev->msix_cap + PCI_MSIX_FLAGS, &val);
- if (rc)
+ rc = pci_msix_vec_count(pdev);
+ if (rc < 0) {
goto err;
-
- msix_entries = msix_table_size(val);
- if (msix_entries > ndev->limits.msix_cnt) {
+ } else if (rc > ndev->limits.msix_cnt) {
rc = -EINVAL;
goto err;
+ } else {
+ msix_entries = rc;
}

ndev->msix_entries = kmalloc(sizeof(struct msix_entry) * msix_entries,
@@ -1112,26 +1106,21 @@ static int ntb_setup_msix(struct ntb_device *ndev)
for (i = 0; i < msix_entries; i++)
ndev->msix_entries[i].entry = i;

- rc = pci_enable_msix(pdev, ndev->msix_entries, msix_entries);
- if (rc < 0)
- goto err1;
- if (rc > 0) {
+ if (ndev->hw_type != BWD_HW)
/* On SNB, the link interrupt is always tied to 4th vector. If
* we can't get all 4, then we can't use MSI-X.
*/
- if (ndev->hw_type != BWD_HW) {
- rc = -EIO;
- goto err1;
- }
-
- dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
- "Only %d MSI-X vectors. Limiting the number of queues to that number.\n",
- rc);
+ rc = pci_enable_msix_range(pdev, ndev->msix_entries,
+ msix_entries, msix_entries);
+ else
+ rc = pci_enable_msix_range(pdev, ndev->msix_entries,
+ 1, msix_entries);
+ if (rc < 0)
+ goto err1;
+ else if (rc < msix_entries) {
+ dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Only %d MSI-X vectors. "
+ "Limiting the number of queues to that number.\n", rc);
msix_entries = rc;
-
- rc = pci_enable_msix(pdev, ndev->msix_entries, msix_entries);
- if (rc)
- goto err1;
}

for (i = 0; i < msix_entries; i++) {
diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h
index bbdb7ed..d307107 100644
--- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h
+++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h
@@ -60,8 +60,6 @@
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_NTB_SS_HSX 0x2F0F
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_NTB_B2B_BWD 0x0C4E

-#define msix_table_size(control) ((control & PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_QSIZE)+1)
-
#ifndef readq
static inline u64 readq(void __iomem *addr)
{
--
1.7.7.6


2014-02-19 18:09:49

by Jon Mason

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ntb: Use pci_enable_msix_range() instead of pci_enable_msix()

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:15:21AM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> As result of deprecation of MSI-X/MSI enablement functions
> pci_enable_msix() and pci_enable_msi_block() all drivers
> using these two interfaces need to be updated to use the
> new pci_enable_msi_range() and pci_enable_msix_range()
> interfaces.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jon Mason <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> ---
> drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
> index 170e8e6..fda37eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
> @@ -1085,21 +1085,15 @@ static int ntb_setup_msix(struct ntb_device *ndev)
> struct msix_entry *msix;
> int msix_entries;
> int rc, i;
> - u16 val;
>
> - if (!pdev->msix_cap) {
> - rc = -EIO;
> - goto err;
> - }
> -
> - rc = pci_read_config_word(pdev, pdev->msix_cap + PCI_MSIX_FLAGS, &val);
> - if (rc)
> + rc = pci_msix_vec_count(pdev);

Nit, you should probably use msix_entries instead of rc in this case.

> + if (rc < 0) {
> goto err;
> -
> - msix_entries = msix_table_size(val);
> - if (msix_entries > ndev->limits.msix_cnt) {
> + } else if (rc > ndev->limits.msix_cnt) {
> rc = -EINVAL;
> goto err;
> + } else {
> + msix_entries = rc;
> }

Style Nit. Braces with only one line. If you make the change above,
then it is moot.

>
> ndev->msix_entries = kmalloc(sizeof(struct msix_entry) * msix_entries,
> @@ -1112,26 +1106,21 @@ static int ntb_setup_msix(struct ntb_device *ndev)
> for (i = 0; i < msix_entries; i++)
> ndev->msix_entries[i].entry = i;
>
> - rc = pci_enable_msix(pdev, ndev->msix_entries, msix_entries);
> - if (rc < 0)
> - goto err1;
> - if (rc > 0) {
> + if (ndev->hw_type != BWD_HW)
> /* On SNB, the link interrupt is always tied to 4th vector. If
> * we can't get all 4, then we can't use MSI-X.
> */
> - if (ndev->hw_type != BWD_HW) {
> - rc = -EIO;
> - goto err1;
> - }
> -
> - dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
> - "Only %d MSI-X vectors. Limiting the number of queues to that number.\n",
> - rc);
> + rc = pci_enable_msix_range(pdev, ndev->msix_entries,
> + msix_entries, msix_entries);
> + else
> + rc = pci_enable_msix_range(pdev, ndev->msix_entries,
> + 1, msix_entries);

Actually, this must be 2 for the min. One for the Data and one for
the Link. If you look a few lines after this in the original code,
there is a grabbing of the last vector for the link. I realize there
is currently no check for this in the driver and a potential error
case occurs. I can make a separate patch to correct this issue if
this patch is not going through my tree.

Thanks,
Jon


> + if (rc < 0)
> + goto err1;
> + else if (rc < msix_entries) {
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Only %d MSI-X vectors. "
> + "Limiting the number of queues to that number.\n", rc);
> msix_entries = rc;
> -
> - rc = pci_enable_msix(pdev, ndev->msix_entries, msix_entries);
> - if (rc)
> - goto err1;
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < msix_entries; i++) {
> diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h
> index bbdb7ed..d307107 100644
> --- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h
> +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h
> @@ -60,8 +60,6 @@
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_NTB_SS_HSX 0x2F0F
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_NTB_B2B_BWD 0x0C4E
>
> -#define msix_table_size(control) ((control & PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_QSIZE)+1)
> -
> #ifndef readq
> static inline u64 readq(void __iomem *addr)
> {
> --
> 1.7.7.6
>

2014-02-19 19:20:58

by Alexander Gordeev

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ntb: Use pci_enable_msix_range() instead of pci_enable_msix()

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:09:27AM -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
> > index 170e8e6..fda37eb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
> > @@ -1085,21 +1085,15 @@ static int ntb_setup_msix(struct ntb_device *ndev)
> > struct msix_entry *msix;
> > int msix_entries;
> > int rc, i;
> > - u16 val;
> >
> > - if (!pdev->msix_cap) {
> > - rc = -EIO;
> > - goto err;
> > - }
> > -
> > - rc = pci_read_config_word(pdev, pdev->msix_cap + PCI_MSIX_FLAGS, &val);
> > - if (rc)
> > + rc = pci_msix_vec_count(pdev);
>
> Nit, you should probably use msix_entries instead of rc in this case.

This way it resembles the code few lines below, so the style looks more
consistent. Whichever you wish, though ;)

> > + if (rc < 0) {
> > goto err;
> > -
> > - msix_entries = msix_table_size(val);
> > - if (msix_entries > ndev->limits.msix_cnt) {
> > + } else if (rc > ndev->limits.msix_cnt) {
> > rc = -EINVAL;
> > goto err;
> > + } else {
> > + msix_entries = rc;
> > }
>
> Style Nit. Braces with only one line. If you make the change above,
> then it is moot.

Not on the top of my head, but do we mix bracing this way?

> >
> > ndev->msix_entries = kmalloc(sizeof(struct msix_entry) * msix_entries,
> > @@ -1112,26 +1106,21 @@ static int ntb_setup_msix(struct ntb_device *ndev)
> > for (i = 0; i < msix_entries; i++)
> > ndev->msix_entries[i].entry = i;
> >
> > - rc = pci_enable_msix(pdev, ndev->msix_entries, msix_entries);
> > - if (rc < 0)
> > - goto err1;
> > - if (rc > 0) {
> > + if (ndev->hw_type != BWD_HW)
> > /* On SNB, the link interrupt is always tied to 4th vector. If
> > * we can't get all 4, then we can't use MSI-X.
> > */
> > - if (ndev->hw_type != BWD_HW) {
> > - rc = -EIO;
> > - goto err1;
> > - }
> > -
> > - dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
> > - "Only %d MSI-X vectors. Limiting the number of queues to that number.\n",
> > - rc);
> > + rc = pci_enable_msix_range(pdev, ndev->msix_entries,
> > + msix_entries, msix_entries);
> > + else
> > + rc = pci_enable_msix_range(pdev, ndev->msix_entries,
> > + 1, msix_entries);
>
> Actually, this must be 2 for the min. One for the Data and one for
> the Link. If you look a few lines after this in the original code,
> there is a grabbing of the last vector for the link. I realize there
> is currently no check for this in the driver and a potential error
> case occurs. I can make a separate patch to correct this issue if
> this patch is not going through my tree.

Well, I can re-post with a separate fix with this condition updated...

} else if (rc < 2 || rc > ndev->limits.msix_cnt) {
rc = -EINVAL;
goto err;
}

...and the original patch with call to pci_enable_msix_range( ...,
2, ndev->limits.msix_cnt)

Will it work with both BWD_HW and non-BWD_HW hardware?

> Thanks,
> Jon
>
>
> > + if (rc < 0)
> > + goto err1;
> > + else if (rc < msix_entries) {
> > + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Only %d MSI-X vectors. "
> > + "Limiting the number of queues to that number.\n", rc);
> > msix_entries = rc;
> > -
> > - rc = pci_enable_msix(pdev, ndev->msix_entries, msix_entries);
> > - if (rc)
> > - goto err1;
> > }
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < msix_entries; i++) {
> > diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h
> > index bbdb7ed..d307107 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h
> > +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h
> > @@ -60,8 +60,6 @@
> > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_NTB_SS_HSX 0x2F0F
> > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_NTB_B2B_BWD 0x0C4E
> >
> > -#define msix_table_size(control) ((control & PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_QSIZE)+1)
> > -
> > #ifndef readq
> > static inline u64 readq(void __iomem *addr)
> > {
> > --
> > 1.7.7.6
> >

--
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
[email protected]

2014-02-19 23:22:03

by Jon Mason

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ntb: Use pci_enable_msix_range() instead of pci_enable_msix()

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 08:22:55PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:09:27AM -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
> > > index 170e8e6..fda37eb 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.c
> > > @@ -1085,21 +1085,15 @@ static int ntb_setup_msix(struct ntb_device *ndev)
> > > struct msix_entry *msix;
> > > int msix_entries;
> > > int rc, i;
> > > - u16 val;
> > >
> > > - if (!pdev->msix_cap) {
> > > - rc = -EIO;
> > > - goto err;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - rc = pci_read_config_word(pdev, pdev->msix_cap + PCI_MSIX_FLAGS, &val);
> > > - if (rc)
> > > + rc = pci_msix_vec_count(pdev);
> >
> > Nit, you should probably use msix_entries instead of rc in this case.
>
> This way it resembles the code few lines below, so the style looks more
> consistent. Whichever you wish, though ;)

It'll save the else statement below, and makes the code a little more
obvious...but its not a big deal.

> > > + if (rc < 0) {
> > > goto err;
> > > -
> > > - msix_entries = msix_table_size(val);
> > > - if (msix_entries > ndev->limits.msix_cnt) {
> > > + } else if (rc > ndev->limits.msix_cnt) {
> > > rc = -EINVAL;
> > > goto err;
> > > + } else {
> > > + msix_entries = rc;
> > > }
> >
> > Style Nit. Braces with only one line. If you make the change above,
> > then it is moot.
>
> Not on the top of my head, but do we mix bracing this way?

It was the preferred style once-upon-a-time to not have braces for
single line if/else. I think it is really up to the driver/driver
maintainer now. I'd prefer it to be the old way, but its not the end
of the world.

> > >
> > > ndev->msix_entries = kmalloc(sizeof(struct msix_entry) * msix_entries,
> > > @@ -1112,26 +1106,21 @@ static int ntb_setup_msix(struct ntb_device *ndev)
> > > for (i = 0; i < msix_entries; i++)
> > > ndev->msix_entries[i].entry = i;
> > >
> > > - rc = pci_enable_msix(pdev, ndev->msix_entries, msix_entries);
> > > - if (rc < 0)
> > > - goto err1;
> > > - if (rc > 0) {
> > > + if (ndev->hw_type != BWD_HW)
> > > /* On SNB, the link interrupt is always tied to 4th vector. If
> > > * we can't get all 4, then we can't use MSI-X.
> > > */
> > > - if (ndev->hw_type != BWD_HW) {
> > > - rc = -EIO;
> > > - goto err1;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
> > > - "Only %d MSI-X vectors. Limiting the number of queues to that number.\n",
> > > - rc);
> > > + rc = pci_enable_msix_range(pdev, ndev->msix_entries,
> > > + msix_entries, msix_entries);
> > > + else
> > > + rc = pci_enable_msix_range(pdev, ndev->msix_entries,
> > > + 1, msix_entries);
> >
> > Actually, this must be 2 for the min. One for the Data and one for
> > the Link. If you look a few lines after this in the original code,
> > there is a grabbing of the last vector for the link. I realize there
> > is currently no check for this in the driver and a potential error
> > case occurs. I can make a separate patch to correct this issue if
> > this patch is not going through my tree.
>
> Well, I can re-post with a separate fix with this condition updated...
>
> } else if (rc < 2 || rc > ndev->limits.msix_cnt) {

Won't this break for rc == 0 (the most probable case)?

I'm fine with the fix being included in this patch, with a comment to
note the fix. I don't believe it could ever be hit in real life, so
I'm not worried about it.


> rc = -EINVAL;
> goto err;
> }
>
> ...and the original patch with call to pci_enable_msix_range( ...,
> 2, ndev->limits.msix_cnt)
>
> Will it work with both BWD_HW and non-BWD_HW hardware?

non-BWD design has a min/max of 4...so it'll always have > 2 or be an
error (hence the comment above).

Thanks,
Jon

> > Thanks,
> > Jon
> >
> >
> > > + if (rc < 0)
> > > + goto err1;
> > > + else if (rc < msix_entries) {
> > > + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Only %d MSI-X vectors. "
> > > + "Limiting the number of queues to that number.\n", rc);
> > > msix_entries = rc;
> > > -
> > > - rc = pci_enable_msix(pdev, ndev->msix_entries, msix_entries);
> > > - if (rc)
> > > - goto err1;
> > > }
> > >
> > > for (i = 0; i < msix_entries; i++) {
> > > diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h
> > > index bbdb7ed..d307107 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_hw.h
> > > @@ -60,8 +60,6 @@
> > > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_NTB_SS_HSX 0x2F0F
> > > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_NTB_B2B_BWD 0x0C4E
> > >
> > > -#define msix_table_size(control) ((control & PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_QSIZE)+1)
> > > -
> > > #ifndef readq
> > > static inline u64 readq(void __iomem *addr)
> > > {
> > > --
> > > 1.7.7.6
> > >
>
> --
> Regards,
> Alexander Gordeev
> [email protected]

2014-02-20 13:21:00

by Alexander Gordeev

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ntb: Use pci_enable_msix_range() instead of pci_enable_msix()

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:09:27AM -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:15:21AM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > @@ -1112,26 +1106,21 @@ static int ntb_setup_msix(struct ntb_device *ndev)
> > for (i = 0; i < msix_entries; i++)
> > ndev->msix_entries[i].entry = i;
> >
> > - rc = pci_enable_msix(pdev, ndev->msix_entries, msix_entries);
> > - if (rc < 0)
> > - goto err1;
> > - if (rc > 0) {
> > + if (ndev->hw_type != BWD_HW)
> > /* On SNB, the link interrupt is always tied to 4th vector. If
> > * we can't get all 4, then we can't use MSI-X.
> > */
> > - if (ndev->hw_type != BWD_HW) {
> > - rc = -EIO;
> > - goto err1;
> > - }
> > -
> > - dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
> > - "Only %d MSI-X vectors. Limiting the number of queues to that number.\n",
> > - rc);
> > + rc = pci_enable_msix_range(pdev, ndev->msix_entries,
> > + msix_entries, msix_entries);
> > + else
> > + rc = pci_enable_msix_range(pdev, ndev->msix_entries,
> > + 1, msix_entries);
>
> Actually, this must be 2 for the min. One for the Data and one for
> the Link. If you look a few lines after this in the original code,
> there is a grabbing of the last vector for the link. I realize there
> is currently no check for this in the driver and a potential error
> case occurs. I can make a separate patch to correct this issue if
> this patch is not going through my tree.

I am confused here again. In the original code I see "ntb-callback-msix"
is requested for all MSI-Xs on BWD_HW and "ntb-event-msix" requested for
the last vector on SNB_HW. Therefore, the range [1..msix_entries] should
be fine for BWD_HW, isn't it?

> Thanks,
> Jon

--
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
[email protected]