On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:31PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> This is a useful function and we should make it visible outside the
> generic PCI code. Export it as a GPL symbol.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Tanmay Inamdar <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host-bridge.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c b/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c
> index 06ace62..8708b652 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c
> @@ -17,12 +17,13 @@ static struct pci_bus *find_pci_root_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
> return bus;
> }
>
> -static struct pci_host_bridge *find_pci_host_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus)
> +struct pci_host_bridge *find_pci_host_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus)
> {
> struct pci_bus *root_bus = find_pci_root_bus(bus);
>
> return to_pci_host_bridge(root_bus->bridge);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(find_pci_host_bridge);
Do you have a place where you actually need to use find_pci_host_bridge()?
I'd rather not export it, even as _GPL, unless we have a user.
If we *do* export it, I'd like it to have a more conventional name, e.g.,
something starting with "pci_".
>
> void pci_set_host_bridge_release(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge,
> void (*release_fn)(struct pci_host_bridge *),
> --
> 1.9.0
>
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 12:39:48AM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:31PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > This is a useful function and we should make it visible outside the
> > generic PCI code. Export it as a GPL symbol.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <[email protected]>
> > Tested-by: Tanmay Inamdar <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/host-bridge.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c b/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c
> > index 06ace62..8708b652 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/host-bridge.c
> > @@ -17,12 +17,13 @@ static struct pci_bus *find_pci_root_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
> > return bus;
> > }
> >
> > -static struct pci_host_bridge *find_pci_host_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus)
> > +struct pci_host_bridge *find_pci_host_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus)
> > {
> > struct pci_bus *root_bus = find_pci_root_bus(bus);
> >
> > return to_pci_host_bridge(root_bus->bridge);
> > }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(find_pci_host_bridge);
>
> Do you have a place where you actually need to use find_pci_host_bridge()?
> I'd rather not export it, even as _GPL, unless we have a user.
The code in arm64 series is using it to implement pci_domain_nr().
>
> If we *do* export it, I'd like it to have a more conventional name, e.g.,
> something starting with "pci_".
Understood. pci_find_host_bridge() ?
Best regards,
Liviu
>
> >
> > void pci_set_host_bridge_release(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge,
> > void (*release_fn)(struct pci_host_bridge *),
> > --
> > 1.9.0
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
> > If we *do* export it, I'd like it to have a more conventional name, e.g.,
> > something starting with "pci_".
>
> Understood. pci_find_host_bridge() ?
pci_get_host_bridge() and take a reference IMHO ? If your primary bus is
not PCI then your PCI "host" bridge could be hot swappable so the API at
least ought to get that right.
Alan