2014-04-07 17:49:38

by Cyrill Gorcunov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [patch 0/3] timerfd -- implement missing parts to checkpoint and restore timerfd state, v2

Hi, here is an updated series, changes mostly in show_fdinfo code which now
produces a way more information (and documentation update). Please take a look
once time permit. Thanks!


2014-04-28 20:53:38

by Cyrill Gorcunov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] timerfd -- implement missing parts to checkpoint and restore timerfd state, v2

On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 09:47:01PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> Hi, here is an updated series, changes mostly in show_fdinfo code which now
> produces a way more information (and documentation update). Please take a look
> once time permit. Thanks!

Hi, any new comments on this series?

2014-04-28 20:59:25

by Thomas Gleixner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] timerfd -- implement missing parts to checkpoint and restore timerfd state, v2

On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 09:47:01PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > Hi, here is an updated series, changes mostly in show_fdinfo code which now
> > produces a way more information (and documentation update). Please take a look
> > once time permit. Thanks!
>
> Hi, any new comments on this series?

Looks ok and I did not do anything about it, as I saw a "will update
in next version" from you in the discussion.

Thanks,

tglx

2014-04-28 21:04:04

by Cyrill Gorcunov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] timerfd -- implement missing parts to checkpoint and restore timerfd state, v2

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:59:34PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 09:47:01PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > > Hi, here is an updated series, changes mostly in show_fdinfo code which now
> > > produces a way more information (and documentation update). Please take a look
> > > once time permit. Thanks!
> >
> > Hi, any new comments on this series?
>
> Looks ok and I did not do anything about it, as I saw a "will update
> in next version" from you in the discussion.

Silly me :( I promised to update the series a bit, and forgot. Thanks, Thomas!