2014-04-11 14:08:44

by Nicolin Chen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_sai: Fix incorrect condition check in trigger()

Patch ASoC: fsl_sai: Fix buggy configurations in trigger() doesn't entirely
fix the condition: FRDE of the current substream direction is being cleared
while the code is still using the non-updated one.

Thus this patch fixes this issue by checking the opposite one's FRDE alone
since the current one's is absolutely disabled.

Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>
---
sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c
index 9858d42..1716a41 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c
@@ -343,7 +343,8 @@ static int fsl_sai_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int cmd,
regmap_update_bits(sai->regmap, FSL_SAI_xCSR(tx),
FSL_SAI_CSR_xIE_MASK, 0);

- if (!(tcsr & FSL_SAI_CSR_FRDE || rcsr & FSL_SAI_CSR_FRDE)) {
+ /* Check if the opposite FRDE is also disabled */
+ if (!(tx ? rcsr & FSL_SAI_CSR_FRDE : tcsr & FSL_SAI_CSR_FRDE)) {
regmap_update_bits(sai->regmap, FSL_SAI_TCSR,
FSL_SAI_CSR_TERE, 0);
regmap_update_bits(sai->regmap, FSL_SAI_RCSR,
--
1.8.4


2014-04-14 20:31:42

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_sai: Fix incorrect condition check in trigger()

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:10:00PM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:

> + /* Check if the opposite FRDE is also disabled */
> + if (!(tx ? rcsr & FSL_SAI_CSR_FRDE : tcsr & FSL_SAI_CSR_FRDE)) {

I've applied this since it's a fix but this is *not* a triumph of
legibility, the ternery operator is often not helpful.


Attachments:
(No filename) (310.00 B)
signature.asc (836.00 B)
Digital signature
Download all attachments

2014-04-15 02:39:15

by Nicolin Chen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_sai: Fix incorrect condition check in trigger()

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:31:26PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:10:00PM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
>
> > + /* Check if the opposite FRDE is also disabled */
> > + if (!(tx ? rcsr & FSL_SAI_CSR_FRDE : tcsr & FSL_SAI_CSR_FRDE)) {
>
> I've applied this since it's a fix but this is *not* a triumph of
> legibility, the ternery operator is often not helpful.

It looks like I've got a bad habit again. I'll be careful next time.

Thank you for reminding me,
Nicolin