On Sat 2014-03-29 11:09:45, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 01/03/14 20:22, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> >Update rx51-battery driver to use the new IIO API of
> >twl4030-madc and add DT support.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <[email protected]>
> This looks fine to me. I'd love to see a more generic solution, but
> we can work on that another time.
>
> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
I don't see this patch in 3.15-rc nor -next. What is needed to push
this patch?
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 02:08:23PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Sat 2014-03-29 11:09:45, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On 01/03/14 20:22, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > >Update rx51-battery driver to use the new IIO API of
> > >twl4030-madc and add DT support.
> > >
> > >Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <[email protected]>
> > This looks fine to me. I'd love to see a more generic solution, but
> > we can work on that another time.
> >
> > Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
>
> Reviewed-by: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
>
> I don't see this patch in 3.15-rc nor -next. What is needed to push
> this patch?
The problem is, that the power subsystem maintainers seem to be too
busy with real life. The last change in their git [0] was 2014-02-01
and I haven't seen any mail from them on the mailinglist since about
the same time. I have just queried his status @ Google+ (there were
some life-signs there).
[0] http://git.infradead.org/battery-2.6.git/
-- Sebastian
On Wed 2014-04-23 18:09:37, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 02:08:23PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Sat 2014-03-29 11:09:45, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > On 01/03/14 20:22, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > > >Update rx51-battery driver to use the new IIO API of
> > > >twl4030-madc and add DT support.
> > > >
> > > >Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <[email protected]>
> > > This looks fine to me. I'd love to see a more generic solution, but
> > > we can work on that another time.
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
> >
> > I don't see this patch in 3.15-rc nor -next. What is needed to push
> > this patch?
>
> The problem is, that the power subsystem maintainers seem to be too
> busy with real life. The last change in their git [0] was 2014-02-01
> and I haven't seen any mail from them on the mailinglist since about
> the same time. I have just queried his status @ Google+ (there were
> some life-signs there).
If there is stilll no life out there, you may want to ask
Rafael W. to queue the patches...
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:32:32AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > The problem is, that the power subsystem maintainers seem to be too
> > busy with real life. The last change in their git [0] was 2014-02-01
> > and I haven't seen any mail from them on the mailinglist since about
> > the same time. I have just queried his status @ Google+ (there were
> > some life-signs there).
>
> If there is still no life out there, you may want to ask
> Rafael W. to queue the patches...
Don't worry, I haven't forgotten the patches. I don't think they
make it into 3.16, but they will go into 3.17. For now I have
put them into a dev branch on [0] and requested to take over the
power supply subsystem (see thread [1] on LKML).
[0] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/sre/linux-power-supply.git
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/16/504
-- Sebastian