It's vsys-l{1,2}-supply, not vsys_l{1,2}-supply.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
index 34098023..ca69f5e 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
@@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ Example:
infet5-supply = <&some_reg>;
infet6-supply = <&some_reg>;
infet7-supply = <&some_reg>;
- vsys_l1-supply = <&some_reg>;
- vsys_l2-supply = <&some_reg>;
+ vsys-l1-supply = <&some_reg>;
+ vsys-l2-supply = <&some_reg>;
regulators {
dcdc1 {
--
1.9.3
Andreas,
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Andreas Färber <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's vsys-l{1,2}-supply, not vsys_l{1,2}-supply.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
> index 34098023..ca69f5e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
> @@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ Example:
> infet5-supply = <&some_reg>;
> infet6-supply = <&some_reg>;
> infet7-supply = <&some_reg>;
> - vsys_l1-supply = <&some_reg>;
> - vsys_l2-supply = <&some_reg>;
> + vsys-l1-supply = <&some_reg>;
> + vsys-l2-supply = <&some_reg>;
Your change matches the code and all existing device trees in the
Linux kernel. I also see plenty of other bindings with dashes, so
this seems reasonable.
Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <[email protected]>
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 06:27:04PM +0100, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Andreas,
>
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Andreas Färber <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It's vsys-l{1,2}-supply, not vsys_l{1,2}-supply.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
> > index 34098023..ca69f5e 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
> > @@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ Example:
> > infet5-supply = <&some_reg>;
> > infet6-supply = <&some_reg>;
> > infet7-supply = <&some_reg>;
> > - vsys_l1-supply = <&some_reg>;
> > - vsys_l2-supply = <&some_reg>;
> > + vsys-l1-supply = <&some_reg>;
> > + vsys-l2-supply = <&some_reg>;
>
> Your change matches the code and all existing device trees in the
> Linux kernel.
Could this fact please be mentioned in the commit message?
Given that:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
> I also see plenty of other bindings with dashes, so this seems
> reasonable.
Dashes rather than underscores are preferred/correct for property names
and compatible strings. Given no-one can possibly be using the
bad/incorrect form with underscores, fixing the documentation to use
dashes makes sense.
Thanks,
Mark.
Am 25.06.2014 12:47, schrieb Mark Rutland:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 06:27:04PM +0100, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Andreas,
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Andreas Färber <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> It's vsys-l{1,2}-supply, not vsys_l{1,2}-supply.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
>>> index 34098023..ca69f5e 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
>>> @@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ Example:
>>> infet5-supply = <&some_reg>;
>>> infet6-supply = <&some_reg>;
>>> infet7-supply = <&some_reg>;
>>> - vsys_l1-supply = <&some_reg>;
>>> - vsys_l2-supply = <&some_reg>;
>>> + vsys-l1-supply = <&some_reg>;
>>> + vsys-l2-supply = <&some_reg>;
>>
>> Your change matches the code and all existing device trees in the
>> Linux kernel.
>
> Could this fact please be mentioned in the commit message?
Yes, I admit the commit message could've been clearer in stating that
only the example is modified, not the actual specification. What about:
"Specification and existing device trees use vsys-l{1,2}-supply, not
vsys_l{1,2}-supply. Fix the example to match the specification."
Maybe also "... typos in example" in the subject.
Let me know whether I should send a v2 or let maintainers fix it up.
Regards,
Andreas
> Given that:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
>
>> I also see plenty of other bindings with dashes, so this seems
>> reasonable.
>
> Dashes rather than underscores are preferred/correct for property names
> and compatible strings. Given no-one can possibly be using the
> bad/incorrect form with underscores, fixing the documentation to use
> dashes makes sense.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Andreas Färber <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am 25.06.2014 12:47, schrieb Mark Rutland:
>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 06:27:04PM +0100, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>> Andreas,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Andreas Färber <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> It's vsys-l{1,2}-supply, not vsys_l{1,2}-supply.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt | 4 ++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
>>>> index 34098023..ca69f5e 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt
>>>> @@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ Example:
>>>> infet5-supply = <&some_reg>;
>>>> infet6-supply = <&some_reg>;
>>>> infet7-supply = <&some_reg>;
>>>> - vsys_l1-supply = <&some_reg>;
>>>> - vsys_l2-supply = <&some_reg>;
>>>> + vsys-l1-supply = <&some_reg>;
>>>> + vsys-l2-supply = <&some_reg>;
>>>
>>> Your change matches the code and all existing device trees in the
>>> Linux kernel.
>>
>> Could this fact please be mentioned in the commit message?
>
> Yes, I admit the commit message could've been clearer in stating that
> only the example is modified, not the actual specification. What about:
>
> "Specification and existing device trees use vsys-l{1,2}-supply, not
> vsys_l{1,2}-supply. Fix the example to match the specification."
>
> Maybe also "... typos in example" in the subject.
>
> Let me know whether I should send a v2 or let maintainers fix it up.
Please send v2.
Rob