2014-12-03 21:43:57

by Jamie Lawler

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] Staging: octeon: Added several blank lines after declarations

Hi,
I've added blank lines after several declarations that were
previously missing them, reducing the number of warnings from
checkpatch.pl.

Regards,
Jamie Lawler

Signed-off-by: Jamie Lawler <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c | 4 ++++
drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-tx.c | 11 +++++++++++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
index b2b6c3c..758b4d9 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ static int cvm_irq_cpu;
static void cvm_oct_enable_napi(void *_)
{
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
napi_schedule(&cvm_oct_napi[cpu].napi);
}

@@ -169,6 +170,7 @@ static inline int cvm_oct_check_rcv_error(cvmx_wqe_t *work)
int interface = cvmx_helper_get_interface_num(work->ipprt);
int index = cvmx_helper_get_interface_index_num(work->ipprt);
union cvmx_gmxx_rxx_frm_ctl gmxx_rxx_frm_ctl;
+
gmxx_rxx_frm_ctl.u64 =
cvmx_read_csr(CVMX_GMXX_RXX_FRM_CTL(index, interface));
if (gmxx_rxx_frm_ctl.s.pre_chk == 0) {
@@ -272,6 +274,7 @@ static int cvm_oct_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
did_work_request = 0;
if (work == NULL) {
union cvmx_pow_wq_int wq_int;
+
wq_int.u64 = 0;
wq_int.s.iq_dis = 1 << pow_receive_group;
wq_int.s.wq_int = 1 << pow_receive_group;
@@ -295,6 +298,7 @@ static int cvm_oct_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
union cvmx_pow_wq_int_cntx counts;
int backlog;
int cores_in_use = core_state.baseline_cores - atomic_read(&core_state.available_cores);
+
counts.u64 = cvmx_read_csr(CVMX_POW_WQ_INT_CNTX(pow_receive_group));
backlog = counts.s.iq_cnt + counts.s.ds_cnt;
if (backlog > budget * cores_in_use && napi != NULL)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-tx.c b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-tx.c
index 4e54d85..b7a7854 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-tx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-tx.c
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ static DECLARE_TASKLET(cvm_oct_tx_cleanup_tasklet, cvm_oct_tx_do_cleanup, 0);
static inline int32_t cvm_oct_adjust_skb_to_free(int32_t skb_to_free, int fau)
{
int32_t undo;
+
undo = skb_to_free > 0 ? MAX_SKB_TO_FREE : skb_to_free +
MAX_SKB_TO_FREE;
if (undo > 0)
@@ -89,6 +90,7 @@ static inline int32_t cvm_oct_adjust_skb_to_free(int32_t skb_to_free, int fau)
static void cvm_oct_kick_tx_poll_watchdog(void)
{
union cvmx_ciu_timx ciu_timx;
+
ciu_timx.u64 = 0;
ciu_timx.s.one_shot = 1;
ciu_timx.s.len = cvm_oct_tx_poll_interval;
@@ -118,9 +120,11 @@ static void cvm_oct_free_tx_skbs(struct net_device *dev)
total_freed += skb_to_free;
if (skb_to_free > 0) {
struct sk_buff *to_free_list = NULL;
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->tx_free_list[qos].lock, flags);
while (skb_to_free > 0) {
struct sk_buff *t;
+
t = __skb_dequeue(&priv->tx_free_list[qos]);
t->next = to_free_list;
to_free_list = t;
@@ -131,6 +135,7 @@ static void cvm_oct_free_tx_skbs(struct net_device *dev)
/* Do the actual freeing outside of the lock. */
while (to_free_list) {
struct sk_buff *t = to_free_list;
+
to_free_list = to_free_list->next;
dev_kfree_skb_any(t);
}
@@ -258,6 +263,7 @@ int cvm_oct_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
cvmx_read_csr(CVMX_GMXX_PRTX_CFG(index, interface));
if (gmx_prt_cfg.s.duplex == 0) {
int add_bytes = 64 - skb->len;
+
if ((skb_tail_pointer(skb) + add_bytes) <=
skb_end_pointer(skb))
memset(__skb_put(skb, add_bytes), 0,
@@ -289,6 +295,7 @@ int cvm_oct_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
CVM_OCT_SKB_CB(skb)[0] = hw_buffer.u64;
for (i = 0; i < skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags; i++) {
struct skb_frag_struct *fs = skb_shinfo(skb)->frags + i;
+
hw_buffer.s.addr = XKPHYS_TO_PHYS(
(u64)(page_address(fs->page.p) +
fs->page_offset));
@@ -495,6 +502,7 @@ skip_xmit:

while (skb_to_free > 0) {
struct sk_buff *t = __skb_dequeue(&priv->tx_free_list[qos]);
+
t->next = to_free_list;
to_free_list = t;
skb_to_free--;
@@ -505,6 +513,7 @@ skip_xmit:
/* Do the actual freeing outside of the lock. */
while (to_free_list) {
struct sk_buff *t = to_free_list;
+
to_free_list = to_free_list->next;
dev_kfree_skb_any(t);
}
@@ -550,6 +559,7 @@ int cvm_oct_xmit_pow(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)

/* Get a work queue entry */
cvmx_wqe_t *work = cvmx_fpa_alloc(CVMX_FPA_WQE_POOL);
+
if (unlikely(work == NULL)) {
printk_ratelimited("%s: Failed to allocate a work queue entry\n",
dev->name);
@@ -713,6 +723,7 @@ static void cvm_oct_tx_do_cleanup(unsigned long arg)
for (port = 0; port < TOTAL_NUMBER_OF_PORTS; port++) {
if (cvm_oct_device[port]) {
struct net_device *dev = cvm_oct_device[port];
+
cvm_oct_free_tx_skbs(dev);
}
}
--
2.1.0


2014-12-03 22:13:22

by Aaro Koskinen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: octeon: Added several blank lines after declarations

Hi,

On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 09:43:51PM +0000, Jamie Lawler wrote:
> --- a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ static int cvm_irq_cpu;
> static void cvm_oct_enable_napi(void *_)
> {
> int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +
> napi_schedule(&cvm_oct_napi[cpu].napi);
> }

This function has already been deleted from the staging tree.
You need to refresh your patch and see if it's still relevant for
the current tree.

A.

2014-12-03 22:31:31

by Jamie Lawler

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: octeon: Added several blank lines after declarations

Thanks Aaro, I will do that now.

Jamie

On 3 December 2014 at 22:13, Aaro Koskinen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 09:43:51PM +0000, Jamie Lawler wrote:
>> --- a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
>> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ static int cvm_irq_cpu;
>> static void cvm_oct_enable_napi(void *_)
>> {
>> int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>> +
>> napi_schedule(&cvm_oct_napi[cpu].napi);
>> }
>
> This function has already been deleted from the staging tree.
> You need to refresh your patch and see if it's still relevant for
> the current tree.
>
> A.