Your d8fb6537f1d4 ("MIPS: kernel: elf: Improve the overall ABI and FPU
mode checks") is included in yesterday's linux-next (ie, next-20150213).
I noticed because a script I use to check linux-next spotted a minor
problem with it.
That commit removed the only user of Kconfig symbol FP32XX_HYBRID_FPRS.
Setting FP32XX_HYBRID_FPRS is now pointless in linux-next. Is the
trivial commit to its entry form arch/mips/Kconfig.debug queued
somewhere?
Paul Bolle
On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 17:57 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Your d8fb6537f1d4 ("MIPS: kernel: elf: Improve the overall ABI and FPU
> mode checks") is included in yesterday's linux-next (ie, next-20150213).
> I noticed because a script I use to check linux-next spotted a minor
> problem with it.
>
> That commit removed the only user of Kconfig symbol FP32XX_HYBRID_FPRS.
> Setting FP32XX_HYBRID_FPRS is now pointless in linux-next. Is the
> trivial commit to its entry form arch/mips/Kconfig.debug queued
[....] to remove its entry from [...]
> somewhere?
Paul Bolle
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 06:33:59PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 17:57 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > Your d8fb6537f1d4 ("MIPS: kernel: elf: Improve the overall ABI and FPU
> > mode checks") is included in yesterday's linux-next (ie, next-20150213).
> > I noticed because a script I use to check linux-next spotted a minor
> > problem with it.
> >
> > That commit removed the only user of Kconfig symbol FP32XX_HYBRID_FPRS.
> > Setting FP32XX_HYBRID_FPRS is now pointless in linux-next. Is the
> > trivial commit to its entry form arch/mips/Kconfig.debug queued
> [....] to remove its entry from [...]
>
> > somewhere?
>
>
> Paul Bolle
>
Hi Paul,
Thanks I will fix the original patch to drop this symbol
--
markos