2015-06-04 10:35:36

by Neil Horman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp:Make the function sctp_assoc_lookup_laddr bool

On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 08:51:07AM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> This makes the function sctp_assoc_lookup_laddr bool due to this
> function only returning either one or zero as its return value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/net/sctp/structs.h | 4 ++--
> net/sctp/associola.c | 8 ++++----
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> index 2bb2fcf..1381be9 100644
> --- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> +++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> @@ -1870,8 +1870,8 @@ struct sctp_transport *sctp_assoc_choose_alter_transport(
> void sctp_assoc_update_retran_path(struct sctp_association *);
> struct sctp_transport *sctp_assoc_lookup_paddr(const struct sctp_association *,
> const union sctp_addr *);
> -int sctp_assoc_lookup_laddr(struct sctp_association *asoc,
> - const union sctp_addr *laddr);
> +bool sctp_assoc_lookup_laddr(struct sctp_association *asoc,
> + const union sctp_addr *laddr);
> struct sctp_transport *sctp_assoc_add_peer(struct sctp_association *,
> const union sctp_addr *address,
> const gfp_t gfp,
> diff --git a/net/sctp/associola.c b/net/sctp/associola.c
> index 197c3f5..69abe78 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/associola.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/associola.c
> @@ -1572,15 +1572,15 @@ int sctp_assoc_set_bind_addr_from_cookie(struct sctp_association *asoc,
> }
>
> /* Lookup laddr in the bind address list of an association. */
> -int sctp_assoc_lookup_laddr(struct sctp_association *asoc,
> - const union sctp_addr *laddr)
> +bool sctp_assoc_lookup_laddr(struct sctp_association *asoc,
> + const union sctp_addr *laddr)
> {
> - int found = 0;
> + bool found = false;
>
> if ((asoc->base.bind_addr.port == ntohs(laddr->v4.sin_port)) &&
> sctp_bind_addr_match(&asoc->base.bind_addr, laddr,
> sctp_sk(asoc->base.sk)))
> - found = 1;
> + found = true;
>
> return found;
> }
> --
> 2.1.4
>
>

If you're going to do this, you might as well also remove the conditional
statement here entirely. I.e. just have the function be this:

return (asoc->base.bind_addr.port == ntohs(laddr->v4.sin_port)) &&
sctp_bind_addr_match(&asoc->base.bind_addr, laddr,
sctp_sk(asoc->base.sk)));

You might also look into makeing it inline, though it doesn't appear in any hot
paths so thats likely overkill

Neil


2015-06-05 17:16:32

by Marcelo Ricardo Leitner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp:Make the function sctp_assoc_lookup_laddr bool

On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 06:35:03AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 08:51:07AM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> > This makes the function sctp_assoc_lookup_laddr bool due to this
> > function only returning either one or zero as its return value.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > include/net/sctp/structs.h | 4 ++--
> > net/sctp/associola.c | 8 ++++----
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> > index 2bb2fcf..1381be9 100644
> > --- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> > +++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> > @@ -1870,8 +1870,8 @@ struct sctp_transport *sctp_assoc_choose_alter_transport(
> > void sctp_assoc_update_retran_path(struct sctp_association *);
> > struct sctp_transport *sctp_assoc_lookup_paddr(const struct sctp_association *,
> > const union sctp_addr *);
> > -int sctp_assoc_lookup_laddr(struct sctp_association *asoc,
> > - const union sctp_addr *laddr);
> > +bool sctp_assoc_lookup_laddr(struct sctp_association *asoc,
> > + const union sctp_addr *laddr);
> > struct sctp_transport *sctp_assoc_add_peer(struct sctp_association *,
> > const union sctp_addr *address,
> > const gfp_t gfp,
> > diff --git a/net/sctp/associola.c b/net/sctp/associola.c
> > index 197c3f5..69abe78 100644
> > --- a/net/sctp/associola.c
> > +++ b/net/sctp/associola.c
> > @@ -1572,15 +1572,15 @@ int sctp_assoc_set_bind_addr_from_cookie(struct sctp_association *asoc,
> > }
> >
> > /* Lookup laddr in the bind address list of an association. */
> > -int sctp_assoc_lookup_laddr(struct sctp_association *asoc,
> > - const union sctp_addr *laddr)
> > +bool sctp_assoc_lookup_laddr(struct sctp_association *asoc,
> > + const union sctp_addr *laddr)
> > {
> > - int found = 0;
> > + bool found = false;
> >
> > if ((asoc->base.bind_addr.port == ntohs(laddr->v4.sin_port)) &&
> > sctp_bind_addr_match(&asoc->base.bind_addr, laddr,
> > sctp_sk(asoc->base.sk)))
> > - found = 1;
> > + found = true;
> >
> > return found;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.1.4
> >
> >
>
> If you're going to do this, you might as well also remove the conditional
> statement here entirely. I.e. just have the function be this:
>
> return (asoc->base.bind_addr.port == ntohs(laddr->v4.sin_port)) &&
> sctp_bind_addr_match(&asoc->base.bind_addr, laddr,
> sctp_sk(asoc->base.sk)));
>
> You might also look into makeing it inline, though it doesn't appear in any hot
> paths so thats likely overkill

+1
just in case you cut&paste, be careful that the 3rd line should start
right after the ( in the 2nd line. (Like it was before)

Marcelo