2016-03-08 02:43:57

by Chanho Min

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] tty: amba-pl011: use sg_table instead of scatterlist

The use of phys_to_page is wrong in commit cb06ff102e2d ("ARM: PL011:
Add support for Rx DMA buffer polling."), beacase DMA address is not
physical address. Also, phys_to_page is not declared in some architecture.
The use of virt_to_page is wrong as well because dma_alloc_coherent
implementaion are allowed to returned remapped memory. So I use sg_table
instead of scatterlist and change to dma_get_sgtable() implementaion.

Reported-by: Wang, Annie <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chanho Min <[email protected]>
---
drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
index c0da0cc..ce8840f 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static struct vendor_data vendor_zte = {
/* Deals with DMA transactions */

struct pl011_sgbuf {
- struct scatterlist sg;
+ struct sg_table sgt;
char *buf;
};

@@ -344,17 +344,23 @@ static int pl011_sgbuf_init(struct dma_chan *chan, struct pl011_sgbuf *sg,
enum dma_data_direction dir)
{
dma_addr_t dma_addr;
+ int ret;

sg->buf = dma_alloc_coherent(chan->device->dev,
PL011_DMA_BUFFER_SIZE, &dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!sg->buf)
return -ENOMEM;

- sg_init_table(&sg->sg, 1);
- sg_set_page(&sg->sg, phys_to_page(dma_addr),
- PL011_DMA_BUFFER_SIZE, offset_in_page(dma_addr));
- sg_dma_address(&sg->sg) = dma_addr;
- sg_dma_len(&sg->sg) = PL011_DMA_BUFFER_SIZE;
+ ret = dma_get_sgtable(chan->device->dev, &sg->sgt, sg->buf, dma_addr,
+ PL011_DMA_BUFFER_SIZE);
+
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dma_free_coherent(chan->device->dev,
+ PL011_DMA_BUFFER_SIZE, sg->buf, dma_addr);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ sg_dma_address(sg->sgt.sgl) = dma_addr;
+ sg_dma_len(sg->sgt.sgl) = PL011_DMA_BUFFER_SIZE;

return 0;
}
@@ -365,7 +371,8 @@ static void pl011_sgbuf_free(struct dma_chan *chan, struct pl011_sgbuf *sg,
if (sg->buf) {
dma_free_coherent(chan->device->dev,
PL011_DMA_BUFFER_SIZE, sg->buf,
- sg_dma_address(&sg->sg));
+ sg_dma_address(sg->sgt.sgl));
+ sg_free_table(&sg->sgt);
}
}

@@ -813,7 +820,7 @@ static int pl011_dma_rx_trigger_dma(struct uart_amba_port *uap)
/* Start the RX DMA job */
sgbuf = uap->dmarx.use_buf_b ?
&uap->dmarx.sgbuf_b : &uap->dmarx.sgbuf_a;
- desc = dmaengine_prep_slave_sg(rxchan, &sgbuf->sg, 1,
+ desc = dmaengine_prep_slave_sg(rxchan, sgbuf->sgt.sgl, 1,
DMA_DEV_TO_MEM,
DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT | DMA_CTRL_ACK);
/*
@@ -863,7 +870,7 @@ static void pl011_dma_rx_chars(struct uart_amba_port *uap,

if (uap->dmarx.poll_rate) {
/* The data can be taken by polling */
- dmataken = sgbuf->sg.length - dmarx->last_residue;
+ dmataken = sgbuf->sgt.sgl->length - dmarx->last_residue;
/* Recalculate the pending size */
if (pending >= dmataken)
pending -= dmataken;
@@ -888,7 +895,7 @@ static void pl011_dma_rx_chars(struct uart_amba_port *uap,

/* Reset the last_residue for Rx DMA poll */
if (uap->dmarx.poll_rate)
- dmarx->last_residue = sgbuf->sg.length;
+ dmarx->last_residue = sgbuf->sgt.sgl->length;

/*
* Only continue with trying to read the FIFO if all DMA chars have
@@ -948,7 +955,7 @@ static void pl011_dma_rx_irq(struct uart_amba_port *uap)
pl011_write(uap->dmacr, uap, REG_DMACR);
uap->dmarx.running = false;

- pending = sgbuf->sg.length - state.residue;
+ pending = sgbuf->sgt.sgl->length - state.residue;
BUG_ON(pending > PL011_DMA_BUFFER_SIZE);
/* Then we terminate the transfer - we now know our residue */
dmaengine_terminate_all(rxchan);
@@ -994,7 +1001,7 @@ static void pl011_dma_rx_callback(void *data)
* the DMA irq handler. So we check the residue here.
*/
rxchan->device->device_tx_status(rxchan, dmarx->cookie, &state);
- pending = sgbuf->sg.length - state.residue;
+ pending = sgbuf->sgt.sgl->length - state.residue;
BUG_ON(pending > PL011_DMA_BUFFER_SIZE);
/* Then we terminate the transfer - we now know our residue */
dmaengine_terminate_all(rxchan);
@@ -1050,7 +1057,7 @@ static void pl011_dma_rx_poll(unsigned long args)
sgbuf = dmarx->use_buf_b ? &uap->dmarx.sgbuf_b : &uap->dmarx.sgbuf_a;
rxchan->device->device_tx_status(rxchan, dmarx->cookie, &state);
if (likely(state.residue < dmarx->last_residue)) {
- dmataken = sgbuf->sg.length - dmarx->last_residue;
+ dmataken = sgbuf->sgt.sgl->length - dmarx->last_residue;
size = dmarx->last_residue - state.residue;
dma_count = tty_insert_flip_string(port, sgbuf->buf + dmataken,
size);
--
1.7.9.5


2016-03-08 09:59:35

by Russell King - ARM Linux

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: amba-pl011: use sg_table instead of scatterlist

On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 11:43:36AM +0900, Chanho Min wrote:
> The use of phys_to_page is wrong in commit cb06ff102e2d ("ARM: PL011:
> Add support for Rx DMA buffer polling."), beacase DMA address is not
> physical address. Also, phys_to_page is not declared in some architecture.
> The use of virt_to_page is wrong as well because dma_alloc_coherent
> implementaion are allowed to returned remapped memory. So I use sg_table
> instead of scatterlist and change to dma_get_sgtable() implementaion.

dma_get_sgtable() is also broken.

> @@ -344,17 +344,23 @@ static int pl011_sgbuf_init(struct dma_chan *chan, struct pl011_sgbuf *sg,
> enum dma_data_direction dir)
> {
> dma_addr_t dma_addr;
> + int ret;
>
> sg->buf = dma_alloc_coherent(chan->device->dev,
> PL011_DMA_BUFFER_SIZE, &dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!sg->buf)
> return -ENOMEM;

sg->buf can be a mapped address, which virt_to_page() will return invalid
results:

int dma_common_get_sgtable(struct device *dev, struct sg_table *sgt,
void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t handle, size_t size)
{
struct page *page = virt_to_page(cpu_addr);
int ret;

ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
if (unlikely(ret))
return ret;

sg_set_page(sgt->sgl, page, PAGE_ALIGN(size), 0);
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_common_get_sgtable);

I've no idea who is shoveling crap like this into the kernel, but it's
_really_ far from good that such broken abstractions are being merged
as generic code.

--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

2016-03-09 00:15:49

by Chanho Min

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH] tty: amba-pl011: use sg_table instead of scatterlist

> > @@ -344,17 +344,23 @@ static int pl011_sgbuf_init(struct dma_chan *chan,
> struct pl011_sgbuf *sg,
> > enum dma_data_direction dir)
> > {
> > dma_addr_t dma_addr;
> > + int ret;
> >
> > sg->buf = dma_alloc_coherent(chan->device->dev,
> > PL011_DMA_BUFFER_SIZE, &dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!sg->buf)
> > return -ENOMEM;
>
> sg->buf can be a mapped address, which virt_to_page() will return
> sg->invalid
> results:
>
> int dma_common_get_sgtable(struct device *dev, struct sg_table *sgt,
> void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t handle, size_t size) {
> struct page *page = virt_to_page(cpu_addr);
> int ret;
>
> ret = sg_alloc_table(sgt, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (unlikely(ret))
> return ret;
>
> sg_set_page(sgt->sgl, page, PAGE_ALIGN(size), 0);
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_common_get_sgtable);
>
> I've no idea who is shoveling crap like this into the kernel, but it's
> _really_ far from good that such broken abstractions are being merged as
> generic code.

dma_get_sgtable goes to ops->get_sgtable first, which dma_to_pfn
will return valid address.
IMHO, Only If ops->alloc returns direct mapping address,
dma_common_get_sgtable can be used.

int arm_dma_get_sgtable(struct device *dev, struct sg_table *sgt,
void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t handle, size_t size,
struct dma_attrs *attrs)
{
struct page *page = pfn_to_page(dma_to_pfn(dev, handle));
int ret;