2016-03-10 20:51:56

by Johannes Weiner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: clarify the uncharge_list() loop

uncharge_list() does an unusual list walk because the function can
take regular lists with dedicated list_heads as well as singleton
lists where a single page is passed via the page->lru list node.

This can sometimes lead to confusion as well as suggestions to replace
the loop with a list_for_each_entry(), which wouldn't work.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 8614e0d750e5..fa7bf354ae32 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -5420,6 +5420,10 @@ static void uncharge_list(struct list_head *page_list)
struct list_head *next;
struct page *page;

+ /*
+ * Note that the list can be a single page->lru; hence the
+ * do-while loop instead of a simple list_for_each_entry().
+ */
next = page_list->next;
do {
unsigned int nr_pages = 1;
--
2.7.2


2016-03-10 21:30:37

by Andrew Morton

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: clarify the uncharge_list() loop


LGTM. It's very late in the cycle so I'll queue all three for 4.6-rc1
and I tagged the first two patches (not this one) for -stable
backporting.

2016-03-10 22:18:10

by Johannes Weiner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: clarify the uncharge_list() loop

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 01:30:34PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> LGTM. It's very late in the cycle so I'll queue all three for 4.6-rc1
> and I tagged the first two patches (not this one) for -stable
> backporting.

Sounds good, thank you.

2016-03-11 08:20:02

by Michal Hocko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: clarify the uncharge_list() loop

On Thu 10-03-16 15:50:15, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> uncharge_list() does an unusual list walk because the function can
> take regular lists with dedicated list_heads as well as singleton
> lists where a single page is passed via the page->lru list node.
>
> This can sometimes lead to confusion as well as suggestions to replace
> the loop with a list_for_each_entry(), which wouldn't work.

Yes this confused at least me 2 times AFAIR.

>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>

Thanks!

> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 8614e0d750e5..fa7bf354ae32 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -5420,6 +5420,10 @@ static void uncharge_list(struct list_head *page_list)
> struct list_head *next;
> struct page *page;
>
> + /*
> + * Note that the list can be a single page->lru; hence the
> + * do-while loop instead of a simple list_for_each_entry().
> + */
> next = page_list->next;
> do {
> unsigned int nr_pages = 1;
> --
> 2.7.2

--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs