2016-03-21 11:54:37

by Lee Jones

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: remove clock tree on error path

On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, Stephen Boyd wrote:

> On 02/19, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > There is a potential resource leak in case when ->probe() fails. We have to
> > unregister and remove clock tree which is done here.
> >
> > This is a follow up to previously pushed commit c4726abce63b ("mfd:
> > intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Use clkdev_create()") that prevents double free() when
> > clkdev_drop() followed by kfree() in devm_kcalloc() release stage.
> >
> > I leave Fixes tag here, but the backporting will require to backport the commit
> > c4726abce63b ("mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Use clkdev_create()") first.
> >
> > Fixes: 60ae5b9f5cdd (mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Add Intel Quark X1000 I2C-GPIO MFD Driver)
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
> > ---
>
> Both look fine to me. You may also want to use
> devm_clk_register() instead so that cleanup is easier.

I'm going to apply your Ack in order to show that you've seen and have
no problems with the patch.

--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog


2016-03-21 19:19:34

by Stephen Boyd

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: remove clock tree on error path

On 03/21, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > Both look fine to me. You may also want to use
> > devm_clk_register() instead so that cleanup is easier.
>
> I'm going to apply your Ack in order to show that you've seen and have
> no problems with the patch.

Ok, thanks.

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project