2016-10-05 21:47:37

by Sagi Grimberg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] blk-mq: Rework blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs()


> @@ -1908,33 +1909,36 @@ static void blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
> if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> node = set->numa_node;
>
> - hctxs[i] = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx),
> - GFP_KERNEL, node);
> - if (!hctxs[i])
> + hctx = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*hctx), GFP_KERNEL, node);
> + if (!hctx)
> break;
>
> - if (blk_mq_init_hctx(q, set, hctxs[i], i, node)) {
> - kfree(hctxs[i]);
> - hctxs[i] = NULL;
> + if (blk_mq_init_hctx(q, set, hctx, i, node)) {
> + kfree(hctx);
> break;
> }
> - blk_mq_hctx_kobj_init(hctxs[i]);
> +
> + blk_mq_hctx_kobj_init(hctx);
> + hctxs[i] = hctx;
> }
> for (j = i; j < q->nr_hw_queues; j++) {
> - struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = hctxs[j];
> + hctx = hctxs[i];

Didn't you mean hctx[j]?


2016-10-06 08:20:37

by Alexander Gordeev

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] blk-mq: Rework blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs()

On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 12:47:26AM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
> >@@ -1908,33 +1909,36 @@ static void blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
> > if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> > node = set->numa_node;
> >
> >- hctxs[i] = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx),
> >- GFP_KERNEL, node);
> >- if (!hctxs[i])
> >+ hctx = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*hctx), GFP_KERNEL, node);
> >+ if (!hctx)
> > break;
> >
> >- if (blk_mq_init_hctx(q, set, hctxs[i], i, node)) {
> >- kfree(hctxs[i]);
> >- hctxs[i] = NULL;
> >+ if (blk_mq_init_hctx(q, set, hctx, i, node)) {
> >+ kfree(hctx);
> > break;
> > }
> >- blk_mq_hctx_kobj_init(hctxs[i]);
> >+
> >+ blk_mq_hctx_kobj_init(hctx);
> >+ hctxs[i] = hctx;
> > }
> > for (j = i; j < q->nr_hw_queues; j++) {
> >- struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = hctxs[j];
> >+ hctx = hctxs[i];
>
> Didn't you mean hctx[j]?

Surely, I did.
Thanks!

2016-10-06 10:11:39

by Sagi Grimberg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] blk-mq: Rework blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs()



On 06/10/16 11:25, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 12:47:26AM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>>
>>> @@ -1908,33 +1909,36 @@ static void blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
>>> if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
>>> node = set->numa_node;
>>>
>>> - hctxs[i] = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx),
>>> - GFP_KERNEL, node);
>>> - if (!hctxs[i])
>>> + hctx = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*hctx), GFP_KERNEL, node);
>>> + if (!hctx)
>>> break;
>>>
>>> - if (blk_mq_init_hctx(q, set, hctxs[i], i, node)) {
>>> - kfree(hctxs[i]);
>>> - hctxs[i] = NULL;
>>> + if (blk_mq_init_hctx(q, set, hctx, i, node)) {
>>> + kfree(hctx);
>>> break;
>>> }
>>> - blk_mq_hctx_kobj_init(hctxs[i]);
>>> +
>>> + blk_mq_hctx_kobj_init(hctx);
>>> + hctxs[i] = hctx;
>>> }
>>> for (j = i; j < q->nr_hw_queues; j++) {
>>> - struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = hctxs[j];
>>> + hctx = hctxs[i];
>>
>> Didn't you mean hctx[j]?
>
> Surely, I did.
> Thanks!

Maybe it would be cleaner to do:

while (--i >= 0) {
hctx = hctxs[i];
...
}

2016-10-09 21:30:23

by Alexander Gordeev

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3 6/8] blk-mq: Rework blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs()

Rework blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs() so deallocation is done in order
reverse to allocation and indentation is bit more easy to read.

CC: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <[email protected]>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 15c03c2..d2c11fc 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1895,6 +1895,7 @@ static void blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
struct request_queue *q)
{
int i, j;
+ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
struct blk_mq_hw_ctx **hctxs = q->queue_hw_ctx;

blk_mq_sysfs_unregister(q);
@@ -1908,33 +1909,36 @@ static void blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
node = set->numa_node;

- hctxs[i] = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx),
- GFP_KERNEL, node);
- if (!hctxs[i])
+ hctx = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*hctx), GFP_KERNEL, node);
+ if (!hctx)
break;

- if (blk_mq_init_hctx(q, set, hctxs[i], i, node)) {
- kfree(hctxs[i]);
- hctxs[i] = NULL;
+ if (blk_mq_init_hctx(q, set, hctx, i, node)) {
+ kfree(hctx);
break;
}
- blk_mq_hctx_kobj_init(hctxs[i]);
+
+ blk_mq_hctx_kobj_init(hctx);
+ hctxs[i] = hctx;
}
for (j = i; j < q->nr_hw_queues; j++) {
- struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = hctxs[j];
+ hctx = hctxs[j];

- if (hctx) {
- if (hctx->tags) {
- blk_mq_free_rq_map(set, hctx->tags, j);
- set->tags[j] = NULL;
- }
- blk_mq_exit_hctx(q, set, hctx, j);
- kobject_put(&hctx->kobj);
- kfree(hctx->ctxs);
- kfree(hctx);
- hctxs[j] = NULL;
+ if (!hctx)
+ continue;

+ hctxs[j] = NULL;
+ kobject_put(&hctx->kobj);
+
+ if (hctx->tags) {
+ blk_mq_free_rq_map(set, hctx->tags, j);
+ set->tags[j] = NULL;
}
+
+ blk_mq_exit_hctx(q, set, hctx, j);
+
+ kfree(hctx->ctxs);
+ kfree(hctx);
}
q->nr_hw_queues = i;
blk_mq_sysfs_register(q);
--
1.8.3.1