Hi!
Please pull the below signed tag for a trio of minor changes
adding PCIe for the ARM ARTPEC SoC.
Thanks!
/Jesper
The following changes since commit bc33b0ca11e3df467777a4fa7639ba488c9d4911:
Linux 4.9-rc4 (2016-11-05 16:23:36 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jesper/artpec.git tags/artpec-for-4.10
for you to fetch changes up to fa5541fc806771a108cd2a48245a229f1ba539ea:
ARM: dts: artpec: add pcie support (2016-11-10 15:51:10 +0100)
----------------------------------------------------------------
ARTPEC changes for 4.10
----------------------------------------------------------------
Niklas Cassel (3):
ARM: ARTPEC-6: add select MFD_SYSCON to MACH_ARTPEC6
ARM: ARTPEC-6: add pcie related options
ARM: dts: artpec: add pcie support
arch/arm/boot/dts/artpec6-devboard.dts | 4 ++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/artpec6.dtsi | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/arm/mach-artpec/Kconfig | 3 +++
3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
/^JN - Jesper Nilsson
--
Jesper Nilsson -- [email protected]
On Thursday, November 10, 2016 4:09:31 PM CET Jesper Nilsson wrote:
> Please pull the below signed tag for a trio of minor changes
> adding PCIe for the ARM ARTPEC SoC.
>
> Thanks!
>
> /Jesper
>
> The following changes since commit bc33b0ca11e3df467777a4fa7639ba488c9d4911:
>
> Linux 4.9-rc4 (2016-11-05 16:23:36 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jesper/artpec.git tags/artpec-for-4.10
>
> for you to fetch changes up to fa5541fc806771a108cd2a48245a229f1ba539ea:
>
> ARM: dts: artpec: add pcie support (2016-11-10 15:51:10 +0100)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> ARTPEC changes for 4.10
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Niklas Cassel (3):
> ARM: ARTPEC-6: add select MFD_SYSCON to MACH_ARTPEC6
> ARM: ARTPEC-6: add pcie related options
> ARM: dts: artpec: add pcie support
>
>
Hi Jesper and Niklas,
I just found the old pull request while going through my mail backlog.
A few things for you to remember for next time:
- please send pull requests "To: [email protected]" so we know they
are destined for arm-soc
- please split up changes to the platform code from dts changes,
defconfig changes and driver changes. Each of them gets sent
to Linus in a separate arm-soc branch, so we have to pull them
in separately too
- For the signed tag, please put in a cleartext description of
the branch, just like you describe each commit in its changelog
text. The tag comment becomes the merge commit text.
- I've looked at the three patches individually and cherry-picked
the first into next/soc and the third into next/dt. The patch
"ARM: ARTPEC-6: add pcie related options" is no longer needed
after commit e13688f ("ARM: select PCI_DOMAINS config from
ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM"), so I dropped that.
Arnd
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 12:16:20AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday, November 10, 2016 4:09:31 PM CET Jesper Nilsson wrote:
> > Please pull the below signed tag for a trio of minor changes
> > adding PCIe for the ARM ARTPEC SoC.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > /Jesper
> >
> > The following changes since commit bc33b0ca11e3df467777a4fa7639ba488c9d4911:
> >
> > Linux 4.9-rc4 (2016-11-05 16:23:36 -0700)
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jesper/artpec.git tags/artpec-for-4.10
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to fa5541fc806771a108cd2a48245a229f1ba539ea:
> >
> > ARM: dts: artpec: add pcie support (2016-11-10 15:51:10 +0100)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > ARTPEC changes for 4.10
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Niklas Cassel (3):
> > ARM: ARTPEC-6: add select MFD_SYSCON to MACH_ARTPEC6
> > ARM: ARTPEC-6: add pcie related options
> > ARM: dts: artpec: add pcie support
> >
> >
>
> Hi Jesper and Niklas,
>
> I just found the old pull request while going through my mail backlog.
>
> A few things for you to remember for next time:
>
> - please send pull requests "To: [email protected]" so we know they
> are destined for arm-soc
Ok, should we add that in the MAINTAINERS file so we can
get it automatically from get_maintainer?
> - please split up changes to the platform code from dts changes,
> defconfig changes and driver changes. Each of them gets sent
> to Linus in a separate arm-soc branch, so we have to pull them
> in separately too
>
> - For the signed tag, please put in a cleartext description of
> the branch, just like you describe each commit in its changelog
> text. The tag comment becomes the merge commit text.
Ok, will do both in the future.
> - I've looked at the three patches individually and cherry-picked
> the first into next/soc and the third into next/dt. The patch
> "ARM: ARTPEC-6: add pcie related options" is no longer needed
> after commit e13688f ("ARM: select PCI_DOMAINS config from
> ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM"), so I dropped that.
Thanks!
> Arnd
/^JN - Jesper Nilsson
--
Jesper Nilsson -- [email protected]
On Monday, November 28, 2016 1:33:31 PM CET Jesper Nilsson wrote:
> > Hi Jesper and Niklas,
> >
> > I just found the old pull request while going through my mail backlog.
> >
> > A few things for you to remember for next time:
> >
> > - please send pull requests "To: [email protected]" so we know they
> > are destined for arm-soc
>
> Ok, should we add that in the MAINTAINERS file so we can
> get it automatically from get_maintainer?
No, we don't want to get every single patch that people submit to
platform maintainers, only the consolidated pull requests that you
send.
Arnd
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 01:57:10PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday, November 28, 2016 1:33:31 PM CET Jesper Nilsson wrote:
> > > Hi Jesper and Niklas,
> > >
> > > I just found the old pull request while going through my mail backlog.
> > >
> > > A few things for you to remember for next time:
> > >
> > > - please send pull requests "To: [email protected]" so we know they
> > > are destined for arm-soc
> >
> > Ok, should we add that in the MAINTAINERS file so we can
> > get it automatically from get_maintainer?
>
> No, we don't want to get every single patch that people submit to
> platform maintainers, only the consolidated pull requests that you
> send.
Right, sounds reasonable, will do.
> Arnd
/^JN - Jesper Nilsson
--
Jesper Nilsson -- [email protected]