Hi Dmitry,
On 02/28/2017 11:46 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Also rename 'priv' variables to eeti.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Hi,
>
> This is all is not tested as I do not have the hardware, so if anyone
> has raumfeld device that would be awesome.
I have no access to such hardware for the time being, and the platform
does not currently boot a mainline kernel either.
So I think we should just merge this set, the changes to the driver look
all good to me. If, at some point, I manage to revive that hardware, I
can give platform bits a try.
Sorry for not being able to really test this for now.
Thanks,
Daniel
>
> drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c
> index 16023867b9da..74d57ef68663 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static bool flip_y;
> module_param(flip_y, bool, 0644);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(flip_y, "flip y coordinate");
>
> -struct eeti_ts_priv {
> +struct eeti_ts {
> struct i2c_client *client;
> struct input_dev *input;
> struct work_struct work;
> @@ -60,25 +60,25 @@ struct eeti_ts_priv {
> #define REPORT_BIT_HAS_PRESSURE (1 << 6)
> #define REPORT_RES_BITS(v) (((v) >> 1) + EETI_TS_BITDEPTH)
>
> -static inline int eeti_ts_irq_active(struct eeti_ts_priv *priv)
> +static inline int eeti_ts_irq_active(struct eeti_ts *eeti)
> {
> - return gpio_get_value(priv->irq_gpio) == priv->irq_active_high;
> + return gpio_get_value(eeti->irq_gpio) == eeti->irq_active_high;
> }
>
> static void eeti_ts_read(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> char buf[6];
> unsigned int x, y, res, pressed, to = 100;
> - struct eeti_ts_priv *priv =
> - container_of(work, struct eeti_ts_priv, work);
> + struct eeti_ts *eeti =
> + container_of(work, struct eeti_ts, work);
>
> - mutex_lock(&priv->mutex);
> + mutex_lock(&eeti->mutex);
>
> - while (eeti_ts_irq_active(priv) && --to)
> - i2c_master_recv(priv->client, buf, sizeof(buf));
> + while (eeti_ts_irq_active(eeti) && --to)
> + i2c_master_recv(eeti->client, buf, sizeof(buf));
>
> if (!to) {
> - dev_err(&priv->client->dev,
> + dev_err(&eeti->client->dev,
> "unable to clear IRQ - line stuck?\n");
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -103,62 +103,62 @@ static void eeti_ts_read(struct work_struct *work)
> y = EETI_MAXVAL - y;
>
> if (buf[0] & REPORT_BIT_HAS_PRESSURE)
> - input_report_abs(priv->input, ABS_PRESSURE, buf[5]);
> + input_report_abs(eeti->input, ABS_PRESSURE, buf[5]);
>
> - input_report_abs(priv->input, ABS_X, x);
> - input_report_abs(priv->input, ABS_Y, y);
> - input_report_key(priv->input, BTN_TOUCH, !!pressed);
> - input_sync(priv->input);
> + input_report_abs(eeti->input, ABS_X, x);
> + input_report_abs(eeti->input, ABS_Y, y);
> + input_report_key(eeti->input, BTN_TOUCH, !!pressed);
> + input_sync(eeti->input);
>
> out:
> - mutex_unlock(&priv->mutex);
> + mutex_unlock(&eeti->mutex);
> }
>
> static irqreturn_t eeti_ts_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> {
> - struct eeti_ts_priv *priv = dev_id;
> + struct eeti_ts *eeti = dev_id;
>
> /* postpone I2C transactions as we are atomic */
> - schedule_work(&priv->work);
> + schedule_work(&eeti->work);
>
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> -static void eeti_ts_start(struct eeti_ts_priv *priv)
> +static void eeti_ts_start(struct eeti_ts *eeti)
> {
> - enable_irq(priv->irq);
> + enable_irq(eeti->irq);
>
> /* Read the events once to arm the IRQ */
> - eeti_ts_read(&priv->work);
> + eeti_ts_read(&eeti->work);
> }
>
> -static void eeti_ts_stop(struct eeti_ts_priv *priv)
> +static void eeti_ts_stop(struct eeti_ts *eeti)
> {
> - disable_irq(priv->irq);
> - cancel_work_sync(&priv->work);
> + disable_irq(eeti->irq);
> + cancel_work_sync(&eeti->work);
> }
>
> static int eeti_ts_open(struct input_dev *dev)
> {
> - struct eeti_ts_priv *priv = input_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct eeti_ts *eeti = input_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> - eeti_ts_start(priv);
> + eeti_ts_start(eeti);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> static void eeti_ts_close(struct input_dev *dev)
> {
> - struct eeti_ts_priv *priv = input_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct eeti_ts *eeti = input_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> - eeti_ts_stop(priv);
> + eeti_ts_stop(eeti);
> }
>
> static int eeti_ts_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> const struct i2c_device_id *idp)
> {
> struct eeti_ts_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&client->dev);
> - struct eeti_ts_priv *priv;
> + struct eeti_ts *eeti;
> struct input_dev *input;
> unsigned int irq_flags;
> int err = -ENOMEM;
> @@ -170,13 +170,14 @@ static int eeti_ts_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> * for interrupts to occur.
> */
>
> - priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!priv) {
> + eeti = kzalloc(sizeof(*eeti), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!eeti) {
> dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to allocate driver data\n");
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> - mutex_init(&priv->mutex);
> + mutex_init(&eeti->mutex);
> +
> input = input_allocate_device();
> if (!input) {
> dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to allocate input device.\n");
> @@ -196,30 +197,30 @@ static int eeti_ts_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> input->open = eeti_ts_open;
> input->close = eeti_ts_close;
>
> - priv->client = client;
> - priv->input = input;
> - priv->irq_gpio = pdata->irq_gpio;
> - priv->irq = gpio_to_irq(pdata->irq_gpio);
> + eeti->client = client;
> + eeti->input = input;
> + eeti->irq_gpio = pdata->irq_gpio;
> + eeti->irq = gpio_to_irq(pdata->irq_gpio);
>
> err = gpio_request_one(pdata->irq_gpio, GPIOF_IN, client->name);
> if (err < 0)
> goto err1;
>
> - priv->irq_active_high = pdata->irq_active_high;
> + eeti->irq_active_high = pdata->irq_active_high;
>
> - irq_flags = priv->irq_active_high ?
> + irq_flags = eeti->irq_active_high ?
> IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING : IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING;
>
> - INIT_WORK(&priv->work, eeti_ts_read);
> - i2c_set_clientdata(client, priv);
> - input_set_drvdata(input, priv);
> + INIT_WORK(&eeti->work, eeti_ts_read);
> + i2c_set_clientdata(client, eeti);
> + input_set_drvdata(input, eeti);
>
> err = input_register_device(input);
> if (err)
> goto err2;
>
> - err = request_irq(priv->irq, eeti_ts_isr, irq_flags,
> - client->name, priv);
> + err = request_irq(eeti->irq, eeti_ts_isr, irq_flags,
> + client->name, eeti);
> if (err) {
> dev_err(&client->dev, "Unable to request touchscreen IRQ.\n");
> goto err3;
> @@ -229,7 +230,7 @@ static int eeti_ts_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> * Disable the device for now. It will be enabled once the
> * input device is opened.
> */
> - eeti_ts_stop(priv);
> + eeti_ts_stop(eeti);
>
> return 0;
>
> @@ -240,23 +241,23 @@ static int eeti_ts_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> gpio_free(pdata->irq_gpio);
> err1:
> input_free_device(input);
> - kfree(priv);
> + kfree(eeti);
> return err;
> }
>
> static int eeti_ts_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> - struct eeti_ts_priv *priv = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + struct eeti_ts *eeti = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>
> - free_irq(priv->irq, priv);
> + free_irq(eeti->irq, eeti);
> /*
> * eeti_ts_stop() leaves IRQ disabled. We need to re-enable it
> * so that device still works if we reload the driver.
> */
> - enable_irq(priv->irq);
> + enable_irq(eeti->irq);
>
> - input_unregister_device(priv->input);
> - kfree(priv);
> + input_unregister_device(eeti->input);
> + kfree(eeti);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -264,18 +265,18 @@ static int eeti_ts_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> static int __maybe_unused eeti_ts_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> - struct eeti_ts_priv *priv = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> - struct input_dev *input_dev = priv->input;
> + struct eeti_ts *eeti = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + struct input_dev *input_dev = eeti->input;
>
> mutex_lock(&input_dev->mutex);
>
> if (input_dev->users)
> - eeti_ts_stop(priv);
> + eeti_ts_stop(eeti);
>
> mutex_unlock(&input_dev->mutex);
>
> if (device_may_wakeup(&client->dev))
> - enable_irq_wake(priv->irq);
> + enable_irq_wake(eeti->irq);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -283,16 +284,16 @@ static int __maybe_unused eeti_ts_suspend(struct device *dev)
> static int __maybe_unused eeti_ts_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> - struct eeti_ts_priv *priv = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> - struct input_dev *input_dev = priv->input;
> + struct eeti_ts *eeti = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + struct input_dev *input_dev = eeti->input;
>
> if (device_may_wakeup(&client->dev))
> - disable_irq_wake(priv->irq);
> + disable_irq_wake(eeti->irq);
>
> mutex_lock(&input_dev->mutex);
>
> if (input_dev->users)
> - eeti_ts_start(priv);
> + eeti_ts_start(eeti);
>
> mutex_unlock(&input_dev->mutex);
>
>
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:28:14AM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On 02/28/2017 11:46 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Also rename 'priv' variables to eeti.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is all is not tested as I do not have the hardware, so if anyone
> > has raumfeld device that would be awesome.
>
> I have no access to such hardware for the time being, and the platform
> does not currently boot a mainline kernel either.
>
> So I think we should just merge this set, the changes to the driver look
> all good to me. If, at some point, I manage to revive that hardware, I
> can give platform bits a try.
OK, I'll be putting you as reviewed-by then.
Thank you for taking a look.
--
Dmitry