2017-03-14 09:23:49

by Peter Senna Tschudin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH V4] dts/imx6q-b850v3: Use megachips-stdpxxxx-ge-b850v3-fw bridges (LVDS-DP++)

Configures the megachips-stdpxxxx-ge-b850v3-fw bridges on the GE
B850v3 dts file.

Cc: Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]>
Cc: Martyn Welch <[email protected]>
Cc: Martin Donnelly <[email protected]>
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]>
Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]>
Cc: Philipp Zabel <[email protected]>
Cc: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <[email protected]>
---
Subject was [PATCH V4 4/4] ...
But patches 1, 2, and 3 are already upstream and were not resent.

Changes from V3:
- Newline fixes
- Removed 'status = "okay";' from '&mux2_i2c2'
- Sorted device nodes in order of unit address

Unchanged since V1.
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-b850v3.dts | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-b850v3.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-b850v3.dts
index d78514c..ef67b47 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-b850v3.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-b850v3.dts
@@ -72,6 +72,14 @@
fsl,data-mapping = "spwg";
fsl,data-width = <24>;
status = "okay";
+
+ port@4 {
+ reg = <4>;
+
+ lvds0_out: endpoint {
+ remote-endpoint = <&stdp4028_in>;
+ };
+ };
};
};

@@ -142,3 +150,61 @@
reg = <0x4a>;
};
};
+
+&mux2_i2c2 {
+ clock-frequency = <100000>;
+
+ stdp2690@72 {
+ compatible = "megachips,stdp2690-ge-b850v3-fw";
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ reg = <0x72>;
+
+ ports {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ port@0 {
+ reg = <0>;
+ stdp2690_in: endpoint {
+ remote-endpoint = <&stdp4028_out>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ port@1 {
+ reg = <1>;
+ stdp2690_out: endpoint {
+ /* Connector for external display */
+ };
+ };
+ };
+ };
+
+ stdp4028@73 {
+ compatible = "megachips,stdp4028-ge-b850v3-fw";
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ reg = <0x73>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&gpio2>;
+ interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+
+ ports {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ port@0 {
+ reg = <0>;
+ stdp4028_in: endpoint {
+ remote-endpoint = <&lvds0_out>;
+ };
+ };
+
+ port@1 {
+ reg = <1>;
+ stdp4028_out: endpoint {
+ remote-endpoint = <&stdp2690_in>;
+ };
+ };
+ };
+ };
+};
--
2.9.3


2017-03-16 02:35:54

by Shawn Guo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] dts/imx6q-b850v3: Use megachips-stdpxxxx-ge-b850v3-fw bridges (LVDS-DP++)

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:23:02AM +0100, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote:
> Configures the megachips-stdpxxxx-ge-b850v3-fw bridges on the GE
> B850v3 dts file.
>
> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]>
> Cc: Martyn Welch <[email protected]>
> Cc: Martin Donnelly <[email protected]>
> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]>
> Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]>
> Cc: Philipp Zabel <[email protected]>
> Cc: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
> Cc: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <[email protected]>

To match i.MX patch style, the subject prefix should be something like
'ARM: dts: imx6q-b850v3: ...'.

> ---
> Subject was [PATCH V4 4/4] ...
> But patches 1, 2, and 3 are already upstream and were not resent.
>
> Changes from V3:
> - Newline fixes
> - Removed 'status = "okay";' from '&mux2_i2c2'
> - Sorted device nodes in order of unit address
>
> Unchanged since V1.
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-b850v3.dts | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-b850v3.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-b850v3.dts
> index d78514c..ef67b47 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-b850v3.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-b850v3.dts
> @@ -72,6 +72,14 @@
> fsl,data-mapping = "spwg";
> fsl,data-width = <24>;
> status = "okay";
> +
> + port@4 {
> + reg = <4>;
> +

Great, it's been fixed.

> + lvds0_out: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&stdp4028_in>;
> + };
> + };
> };
> };
>
> @@ -142,3 +150,61 @@
> reg = <0x4a>;
> };
> };
> +
> +&mux2_i2c2 {
> + clock-frequency = <100000>;
> +
> + stdp2690@72 {
> + compatible = "megachips,stdp2690-ge-b850v3-fw";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + reg = <0x72>;
> +
> + ports {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + port@0 {
> + reg = <0>;

But this one ...

> + stdp2690_in: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&stdp4028_out>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + port@1 {
> + reg = <1>;

... here ...

> + stdp2690_out: endpoint {
> + /* Connector for external display */
> + };
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +
> + stdp4028@73 {
> + compatible = "megachips,stdp4028-ge-b850v3-fw";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + reg = <0x73>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&gpio2>;
> + interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +
> + ports {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + port@0 {
> + reg = <0>;

... here ...

> + stdp4028_in: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&lvds0_out>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + port@1 {
> + reg = <1>;

... and here.

I fixed up all of them and applied patch.

Shawn

> + stdp4028_out: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&stdp2690_in>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +};
> --
> 2.9.3
>

2017-03-16 08:41:22

by Daniel Vetter

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] dts/imx6q-b850v3: Use megachips-stdpxxxx-ge-b850v3-fw bridges (LVDS-DP++)

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:34:59AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> I fixed up all of them and applied patch.

+1 on doing review like this. And for committers you can do "with all that
fixed r-b: me" and let them fix it up & push themselves, even less work
:-)

Cheers, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

2017-03-16 08:57:18

by Peter Senna Tschudin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] dts/imx6q-b850v3: Use megachips-stdpxxxx-ge-b850v3-fw bridges (LVDS-DP++)

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 09:41:03AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:34:59AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > I fixed up all of them and applied patch.
>
> +1 on doing review like this. And for committers you can do "with all that
> fixed r-b: me" and let them fix it up & push themselves, even less work
> :-)

Thank you Shawn!

[...]