2017-04-13 09:24:47

by Craig Inches

Subject: [PATCH RESEND v2] Staging: lustre cleanup macros in libcfs_private.h

This resolves a checkpatch warning that "Single statement macros should
not use a do {} while (0) loop" by removing the loop and adjusting line
length accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Craig Inches <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v2:
- Kept statements together
- Kept operator on previous line

.../lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h | 51 +++++++---------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
index 2dae857..e774c75 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
@@ -87,12 +87,9 @@ do { \
#define LIBCFS_VMALLOC_SIZE (2 << PAGE_SHIFT) /* 2 pages */
#endif

-#define LIBCFS_ALLOC_PRE(size, mask) \
-do { \
- LASSERT(!in_interrupt() || \
- ((size) <= LIBCFS_VMALLOC_SIZE && \
- !gfpflags_allow_blocking(mask))); \
-} while (0)
+#define LIBCFS_ALLOC_PRE(size, mask) \
+ LASSERT(!in_interrupt() || ((size) <= LIBCFS_VMALLOC_SIZE && \
+ !gfpflags_allow_blocking(mask)))

#define LIBCFS_ALLOC_POST(ptr, size) \
do { \
@@ -187,46 +184,28 @@ void cfs_array_free(void *vars);
#if LASSERT_ATOMIC_ENABLED

/** assert value of @a is equal to @v */
-#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_EQ(a, v) \
-do { \
- LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) == v, \
- "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
-} while (0)
+#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_EQ(a, v) \
+ LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) == v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))

/** assert value of @a is unequal to @v */
-#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_NE(a, v) \
-do { \
- LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) != v, \
- "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
-} while (0)
+#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_NE(a, v) \
+ LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) != v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))

/** assert value of @a is little than @v */
-#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_LT(a, v) \
-do { \
- LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) < v, \
- "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
-} while (0)
+#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_LT(a, v) \
+ LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) < v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))

/** assert value of @a is little/equal to @v */
-#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_LE(a, v) \
-do { \
- LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) <= v, \
- "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
-} while (0)
+#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_LE(a, v) \
+ LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) <= v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))

/** assert value of @a is great than @v */
-#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GT(a, v) \
-do { \
- LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) > v, \
- "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
-} while (0)
+#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GT(a, v) \
+ LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) > v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))

/** assert value of @a is great/equal to @v */
-#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GE(a, v) \
-do { \
- LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) >= v, \
- "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
-} while (0)
+#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GE(a, v) \
+ LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) >= v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))

/** assert value of @a is great than @v1 and little than @v2 */
#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GT_LT(a, v1, v2) \
--
2.10.2

2017-04-14 08:15:18

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2] Staging: lustre cleanup macros in libcfs_private.h

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:24:41AM +0100, Craig Inches wrote:
> This resolves a checkpatch warning that "Single statement macros should
> not use a do {} while (0) loop" by removing the loop and adjusting line
> length accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Craig Inches <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Kept statements together
> - Kept operator on previous line

Why RESEND?

>
> .../lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h | 51 +++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
> index 2dae857..e774c75 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
> @@ -87,12 +87,9 @@ do { \
> #define LIBCFS_VMALLOC_SIZE (2 << PAGE_SHIFT) /* 2 pages */
> #endif
>
> -#define LIBCFS_ALLOC_PRE(size, mask) \
> -do { \
> - LASSERT(!in_interrupt() || \
> - ((size) <= LIBCFS_VMALLOC_SIZE && \
> - !gfpflags_allow_blocking(mask))); \
> -} while (0)
> +#define LIBCFS_ALLOC_PRE(size, mask) \
> + LASSERT(!in_interrupt() || ((size) <= LIBCFS_VMALLOC_SIZE && \
> + !gfpflags_allow_blocking(mask)))
>
> #define LIBCFS_ALLOC_POST(ptr, size) \
> do { \
> @@ -187,46 +184,28 @@ void cfs_array_free(void *vars);
> #if LASSERT_ATOMIC_ENABLED
>
> /** assert value of @a is equal to @v */
> -#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_EQ(a, v) \
> -do { \
> - LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) == v, \
> - "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
> -} while (0)
> +#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_EQ(a, v) \
> + LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) == v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
>
> /** assert value of @a is unequal to @v */
> -#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_NE(a, v) \
> -do { \
> - LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) != v, \
> - "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
> -} while (0)
> +#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_NE(a, v) \
> + LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) != v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
>
> /** assert value of @a is little than @v */
> -#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_LT(a, v) \
> -do { \
> - LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) < v, \
> - "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
> -} while (0)
> +#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_LT(a, v) \
> + LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) < v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
>
> /** assert value of @a is little/equal to @v */
> -#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_LE(a, v) \
> -do { \
> - LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) <= v, \
> - "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
> -} while (0)
> +#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_LE(a, v) \
> + LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) <= v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
>
> /** assert value of @a is great than @v */
> -#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GT(a, v) \
> -do { \
> - LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) > v, \
> - "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
> -} while (0)
> +#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GT(a, v) \
> + LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) > v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
>
> /** assert value of @a is great/equal to @v */
> -#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GE(a, v) \
> -do { \
> - LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) >= v, \
> - "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
> -} while (0)
> +#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GE(a, v) \
> + LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) >= v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
>
> /** assert value of @a is great than @v1 and little than @v2 */
> #define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GT_LT(a, v1, v2) \

I need a lustre maintainer to ack this one before I can take it.
Perhaps there was a good reasaon do { } while is used here...

thanks,

greg k-h

2017-04-18 09:48:18

by Dilger, Andreas

Subject: Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH RESEND v2] Staging: lustre cleanup macros in libcfs_private.h

On Apr 13, 2017, at 03:24, Craig Inches <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This resolves a checkpatch warning that "Single statement macros should
> not use a do {} while (0) loop" by removing the loop and adjusting line
> length accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Craig Inches <[email protected]>

I don't think there was any particular reason for "do { } while(0)" here except
force of habit.

Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <[email protected]>

> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Kept statements together
> - Kept operator on previous line
>
> .../lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h | 51 +++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
> index 2dae857..e774c75 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs_private.h
> @@ -87,12 +87,9 @@ do { \
> #define LIBCFS_VMALLOC_SIZE (2 << PAGE_SHIFT) /* 2 pages */
> #endif
>
> -#define LIBCFS_ALLOC_PRE(size, mask) \
> -do { \
> - LASSERT(!in_interrupt() || \
> - ((size) <= LIBCFS_VMALLOC_SIZE && \
> - !gfpflags_allow_blocking(mask))); \
> -} while (0)
> +#define LIBCFS_ALLOC_PRE(size, mask) \
> + LASSERT(!in_interrupt() || ((size) <= LIBCFS_VMALLOC_SIZE && \
> + !gfpflags_allow_blocking(mask)))
>
> #define LIBCFS_ALLOC_POST(ptr, size) \
> do { \
> @@ -187,46 +184,28 @@ void cfs_array_free(void *vars);
> #if LASSERT_ATOMIC_ENABLED
>
> /** assert value of @a is equal to @v */
> -#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_EQ(a, v) \
> -do { \
> - LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) == v, \
> - "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
> -} while (0)
> +#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_EQ(a, v) \
> + LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) == v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
>
> /** assert value of @a is unequal to @v */
> -#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_NE(a, v) \
> -do { \
> - LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) != v, \
> - "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
> -} while (0)
> +#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_NE(a, v) \
> + LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) != v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
>
> /** assert value of @a is little than @v */
> -#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_LT(a, v) \
> -do { \
> - LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) < v, \
> - "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
> -} while (0)
> +#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_LT(a, v) \
> + LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) < v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
>
> /** assert value of @a is little/equal to @v */
> -#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_LE(a, v) \
> -do { \
> - LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) <= v, \
> - "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
> -} while (0)
> +#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_LE(a, v) \
> + LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) <= v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
>
> /** assert value of @a is great than @v */
> -#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GT(a, v) \
> -do { \
> - LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) > v, \
> - "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
> -} while (0)
> +#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GT(a, v) \
> + LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) > v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
>
> /** assert value of @a is great/equal to @v */
> -#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GE(a, v) \
> -do { \
> - LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) >= v, \
> - "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a))); \
> -} while (0)
> +#define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GE(a, v) \
> + LASSERTF(atomic_read(a) >= v, "value: %d\n", atomic_read((a)))
>
> /** assert value of @a is great than @v1 and little than @v2 */
> #define LASSERT_ATOMIC_GT_LT(a, v1, v2) \
> --
> 2.10.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> lustre-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel Corporation