2017-04-24 00:34:36

by Pan Bian

Subject: [PATCH 1/1] power: Fix unchecked return value of devm_kzalloc

Function devm_kzalloc() will return a NULL pointer. However, in function
isp1704_charger_probe(), the return value of devm_kzalloc() is directly
used without validation. This may result in a bad memory access bug.

Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <[email protected]>
---
drivers/power/supply/isp1704_charger.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/isp1704_charger.c b/drivers/power/supply/isp1704_charger.c
index 4cd6899..2f02463 100644
--- a/drivers/power/supply/isp1704_charger.c
+++ b/drivers/power/supply/isp1704_charger.c
@@ -418,6 +418,8 @@ static int isp1704_charger_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

pdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
sizeof(struct isp1704_charger_data), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (pdata)
+ goto fail0;
pdata->enable_gpio = gpio;

dev_info(&pdev->dev, "init gpio %d\n", pdata->enable_gpio);
--
1.9.1

2017-04-24 07:16:39

by Pali Rohár

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] power: Fix unchecked return value of devm_kzalloc

On Monday 24 April 2017 08:34:08 Pan Bian wrote:
> Function devm_kzalloc() will return a NULL pointer. However, in function
> isp1704_charger_probe(), the return value of devm_kzalloc() is directly
> used without validation. This may result in a bad memory access bug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/power/supply/isp1704_charger.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/isp1704_charger.c b/drivers/power/supply/isp1704_charger.c
> index 4cd6899..2f02463 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/isp1704_charger.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/isp1704_charger.c
> @@ -418,6 +418,8 @@ static int isp1704_charger_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> pdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> sizeof(struct isp1704_charger_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (pdata)
> + goto fail0;
> pdata->enable_gpio = gpio;
>
> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "init gpio %d\n", pdata->enable_gpio);

fail0 returns ret value value which is initialized to -ENODEV. It could
be fragile if somebody change default initialization ret value to
something else (wort to 0). In your case before goto fail0 it is needed
to explicitly set ret to -ENOMEM so prevent future problems.

--
Pali Rohár
[email protected]