2017-08-25 14:40:24

by Corentin Labbe

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] net: stmmac: dwmac-sun8i: Use reset exclusive

The current dwmac_sun8i module cannot be rmmod/modprobe due to that
the reset controller was not released when removed.

This patch remove ambiguity, by using of_reset_control_get_exclusive and
add the missing reset_control_put().

Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c
index fffd6d5fc907..675a09629d85 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c
@@ -782,6 +782,7 @@ static int sun8i_dwmac_unpower_internal_phy(struct sunxi_priv_data *gmac)

clk_disable_unprepare(gmac->ephy_clk);
reset_control_assert(gmac->rst_ephy);
+ reset_control_put(gmac->rst_ephy);
return 0;
}

@@ -942,7 +943,7 @@ static int sun8i_dwmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -EINVAL;
}

- gmac->rst_ephy = of_reset_control_get(plat_dat->phy_node, NULL);
+ gmac->rst_ephy = of_reset_control_get_exclusive(plat_dat->phy_node, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(gmac->rst_ephy)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(gmac->rst_ephy);
if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
--
2.13.5


2017-08-25 14:48:45

by Maxime Ripard

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: dwmac-sun8i: Use reset exclusive

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 04:38:05PM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> The current dwmac_sun8i module cannot be rmmod/modprobe due to that
> the reset controller was not released when removed.
>
> This patch remove ambiguity, by using of_reset_control_get_exclusive and
> add the missing reset_control_put().
>
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c
> index fffd6d5fc907..675a09629d85 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c
> @@ -782,6 +782,7 @@ static int sun8i_dwmac_unpower_internal_phy(struct sunxi_priv_data *gmac)
>
> clk_disable_unprepare(gmac->ephy_clk);
> reset_control_assert(gmac->rst_ephy);
> + reset_control_put(gmac->rst_ephy);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -942,7 +943,7 @@ static int sun8i_dwmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - gmac->rst_ephy = of_reset_control_get(plat_dat->phy_node, NULL);
> + gmac->rst_ephy = of_reset_control_get_exclusive(plat_dat->phy_node, NULL);

Why not just use devm_reset_control_get?

Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com


Attachments:
(No filename) (1.39 kB)
signature.asc (801.00 B)
Download all attachments

2017-08-25 15:17:41

by Corentin Labbe

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: dwmac-sun8i: Use reset exclusive

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 04:48:32PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 04:38:05PM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> > The current dwmac_sun8i module cannot be rmmod/modprobe due to that
> > the reset controller was not released when removed.
> >
> > This patch remove ambiguity, by using of_reset_control_get_exclusive and
> > add the missing reset_control_put().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c
> > index fffd6d5fc907..675a09629d85 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c
> > @@ -782,6 +782,7 @@ static int sun8i_dwmac_unpower_internal_phy(struct sunxi_priv_data *gmac)
> >
> > clk_disable_unprepare(gmac->ephy_clk);
> > reset_control_assert(gmac->rst_ephy);
> > + reset_control_put(gmac->rst_ephy);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -942,7 +943,7 @@ static int sun8i_dwmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > - gmac->rst_ephy = of_reset_control_get(plat_dat->phy_node, NULL);
> > + gmac->rst_ephy = of_reset_control_get_exclusive(plat_dat->phy_node, NULL);
>
> Why not just use devm_reset_control_get?
>

Because there no devm_ functions with of_

Regards

2017-08-25 17:12:46

by Maxime Ripard

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: dwmac-sun8i: Use reset exclusive

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 05:17:33PM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 04:48:32PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 04:38:05PM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> > > The current dwmac_sun8i module cannot be rmmod/modprobe due to that
> > > the reset controller was not released when removed.
> > >
> > > This patch remove ambiguity, by using of_reset_control_get_exclusive and
> > > add the missing reset_control_put().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c | 3 ++-
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c
> > > index fffd6d5fc907..675a09629d85 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c
> > > @@ -782,6 +782,7 @@ static int sun8i_dwmac_unpower_internal_phy(struct sunxi_priv_data *gmac)
> > >
> > > clk_disable_unprepare(gmac->ephy_clk);
> > > reset_control_assert(gmac->rst_ephy);
> > > + reset_control_put(gmac->rst_ephy);
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -942,7 +943,7 @@ static int sun8i_dwmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - gmac->rst_ephy = of_reset_control_get(plat_dat->phy_node, NULL);
> > > + gmac->rst_ephy = of_reset_control_get_exclusive(plat_dat->phy_node, NULL);
> >
> > Why not just use devm_reset_control_get?
> >
>
> Because there no devm_ functions with of_

devm_reset_control_get uses of_reset_control_get internally.

Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com


Attachments:
(No filename) (1.75 kB)
signature.asc (801.00 B)
Download all attachments

2017-08-30 10:22:29

by Corentin Labbe

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: dwmac-sun8i: Use reset exclusive

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 07:12:33PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 05:17:33PM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 04:48:32PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 04:38:05PM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> > > > The current dwmac_sun8i module cannot be rmmod/modprobe due to that
> > > > the reset controller was not released when removed.
> > > >
> > > > This patch remove ambiguity, by using of_reset_control_get_exclusive and
> > > > add the missing reset_control_put().
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c | 3 ++-
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c
> > > > index fffd6d5fc907..675a09629d85 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-sun8i.c
> > > > @@ -782,6 +782,7 @@ static int sun8i_dwmac_unpower_internal_phy(struct sunxi_priv_data *gmac)
> > > >
> > > > clk_disable_unprepare(gmac->ephy_clk);
> > > > reset_control_assert(gmac->rst_ephy);
> > > > + reset_control_put(gmac->rst_ephy);
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > @@ -942,7 +943,7 @@ static int sun8i_dwmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > return -EINVAL;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > - gmac->rst_ephy = of_reset_control_get(plat_dat->phy_node, NULL);
> > > > + gmac->rst_ephy = of_reset_control_get_exclusive(plat_dat->phy_node, NULL);
> > >
> > > Why not just use devm_reset_control_get?
> > >
> >
> > Because there no devm_ functions with of_
>
> devm_reset_control_get uses of_reset_control_get internally.

Hello

You are right.
But since the ephy reset is in a child node, devm_ does not find it.

Regards