Hello Peter,
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:13:45AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 05:44:27PM -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > @@ -46,6 +48,8 @@ static inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
> > if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR))
> > return false;
> >
> > + if (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_DEDICATED))
> > + return false;
> > /*
> > * On hypervisors without PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS support we fall
> > * back to a Test-and-Set spinlock, because fair locks have
>
> This does not apply. Much has been changed here recently.
>
I checked against Linus master branch before sending. Which tree/branch are you referring to / should I based this?
--
All the best,
Eduardo Valentin
From 1582137599554342259@xxx Tue Oct 24 11:19:53 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1582097697369322680
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums