2017-11-03 15:48:43

by Gustavo A. R. Silva

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: pcwd_pci: mark expected switch fall-through

Hi Wim,

Quoting Wim Van Sebroeck <[email protected]>:

> Hi Gustavo,
>
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
>> where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> Notice that in this particular case I replaced "Fall" with a proper
>> "fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/watchdog/pcwd_pci.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_pci.c b/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_pci.c
>> index c0d07ee..c882252 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_pci.c
>> @@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ static long pcipcwd_ioctl(struct file *file,
>> unsigned int cmd,
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> pcipcwd_keepalive();
>> - /* Fall */
>> + /* fall through */
>> }
>>
>> case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>
> Shouldn't the /* fall through */ come after the } ?
>

Yep, you are right.

I'll fix that.

Thank you!
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva

> Kind regards,
> Wim.









From 1583058248732703967@xxx Fri Nov 03 15:13:13 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1583056957567251846
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread