2017-11-03 15:13:13

by Wim Van Sebroeck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: pcwd_pci: mark expected switch fall-through

Hi Gustavo,

> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Notice that in this particular case I replaced "Fall" with a proper
> "fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/pcwd_pci.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_pci.c b/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_pci.c
> index c0d07ee..c882252 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_pci.c
> @@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ static long pcipcwd_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> return -EINVAL;
>
> pcipcwd_keepalive();
> - /* Fall */
> + /* fall through */
> }
>
> case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
> --
> 2.7.4
>

Shouldn't the /* fall through */ come after the } ?

Kind regards,
Wim.


From 1583056957567251846@xxx Fri Nov 03 14:52:41 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1583056957567251846
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread