On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 01:23:56PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 06/11/2017 21:26, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > Currently, the existing qspinlock implementation will fallback to
> > test-and-set if the hypervisor has not set the PV_UNHALT flag.
> >
> > This patch gives the opportunity to guest kernels to select
> > between test-and-set and the regular queueu fair lock implementation
> > based on the PV_DEDICATED KVM feature flag. When the PV_DEDICATED
> > flag is not set, the code will still fall back to test-and-set,
> > but when the PV_DEDICATED flag is set, the code will use
> > the regular queue spinlock implementation.
> >
> > With this patch, when in autoselect mode, the guest will
> > use the default spinlock implementation based on host feature
> > flags as follows:
> >
> > PV_DEDICATED = 1, PV_UNHALT = anything: default is qspinlock
> > PV_DEDICATED = 0, PV_UNHALT = 1: default is pvqspinlock
> > PV_DEDICATED = 0, PV_UNHALT = 0: default is tas
>
> Hi Eduardo,
>
> besides the suggestion to use a separate word than the one for features,
Ok. I will take a look.
> is this still needed after Waiman's patch to adaptively switch between
> tas and pvqspinlock?
Can you please point me to it ? Is it already in tip/master?
>
> Paolo
>
> > Cc: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
> > Cc: "Radim Krčmář" <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Waiman Long <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Cc: Jan H. Schoenherr <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Anthony Liguori <[email protected]>
> > Suggested-by: Matt Wilson <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > V3:
> > - When PV_DEDICATED is set (1), qspinlock is selected,
> > regardless of the value of PV_UNHAULT. Suggested by Paolo Bonzini.
> > - Refreshed on top of tip/master.
> > V2:
> > - rebase on top of tip/master
> >
> > Documentation/virtual/kvm/cpuid.txt | 6 ++++++
> > arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h | 4 ++++
> > arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h | 1 +
> > arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 2 ++
> > 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/cpuid.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/cpuid.txt
> > index 3c65feb..117066a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/cpuid.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/cpuid.txt
> > @@ -54,6 +54,12 @@ KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT || 7 || guest checks this feature bit
> > || || before enabling paravirtualized
> > || || spinlock support.
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > +KVM_FEATURE_PV_DEDICATED || 8 || guest checks this feature bit
> > + || || to determine if they run on
> > + || || dedicated vCPUs, allowing opti-
> > + || || mizations such as usage of
> > + || || qspinlocks.
> > +------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE_STABLE_BIT || 24 || host will warn if no guest-side
> > || || per-cpu warps are expected in
> > || || kvmclock.
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
> > index 5e16b5d..de42694 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
> > @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
> > #define _ASM_X86_QSPINLOCK_H
> >
> > #include <linux/jump_label.h>
> > +#include <linux/kvm_para.h>
> > +
> > #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> > #include <asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h>
> > #include <asm/paravirt.h>
> > @@ -58,6 +60,8 @@ static inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
> > if (!static_branch_likely(&virt_spin_lock_key))
> > return false;
> >
> > + if (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_DEDICATED))
> > + return false;
> > /*
> > * On hypervisors without PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS support we fall
> > * back to a Test-and-Set spinlock, because fair locks have
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
> > index 554aa8f..85a9875 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h
> > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> > #define KVM_FEATURE_STEAL_TIME 5
> > #define KVM_FEATURE_PV_EOI 6
> > #define KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT 7
> > +#define KVM_FEATURE_PV_DEDICATED 8
> >
> > /* The last 8 bits are used to indicate how to interpret the flags field
> > * in pvclock structure. If no bits are set, all flags are ignored.
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> > index 8bb9594..dacd7cf 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> > @@ -642,6 +642,8 @@ void __init kvm_spinlock_init(void)
> > {
> > if (!kvm_para_available())
> > return;
> > + if (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_DEDICATED))
> > + return;
> > /* Does host kernel support KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT? */
> > if (!kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_UNHALT))
> > return;
> >
>
>
--
All the best,
Eduardo Valentin
From 1583413679504267089@xxx Tue Nov 07 13:22:38 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1583352031107436177
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread