On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:37:42AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 03:56:26PM +0530, Prateek Sood wrote:
> > Any improvement/suggestion for this patch?
>
> I would have done 2 patches, the first one solving the locking issue,
> the second removing the then redundant async rebuild stuff.
>
> Other than that this looks OK I suppose, but I was expecting this to go
> through the cgroup tree, TJ?
Will pick them up after -rc1.
Thanks.
--
tejun
From 1584161337236698822@xxx Wed Nov 15 19:26:20 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1577859769769316492
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread
On 11/15/2017 10:35 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:37:42AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 03:56:26PM +0530, Prateek Sood wrote:
>>> Any improvement/suggestion for this patch?
>>
>> I would have done 2 patches, the first one solving the locking issue,
>> the second removing the then redundant async rebuild stuff.
>>
>> Other than that this looks OK I suppose, but I was expecting this to go
>> through the cgroup tree, TJ?
>
> Will pick them up after -rc1.
>
> Thanks.
>
I have made two patches as suggested by Peter and sent for review.
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation
Center, Inc., is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation
Collaborative Project
From 1584142291252126087@xxx Wed Nov 15 14:23:36 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1577859769769316492
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread