On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 23:58:44 -0800
Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:36:53 -0700
> > Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 03:27:37 -0700
> >> > Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> >> >> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
> >> >> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
> >> >>
> >> >> Cc: Harald Freudenberger <[email protected]>
> >> >> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>
> >> >> Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
> >> >> Cc: [email protected]
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c | 10 +++++-----
> >> >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h | 2 +-
> >> >> drivers/s390/crypto/ap_queue.c | 2 +-
> >> >> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > Parked for the second part of the s390 updates for the next merge window.
> >> > Thanks.
> >>
> >> Thanks for getting these staged. I just wanted to check with you,
> >> since I don't see these in -next anywhere yet:
> >>
> >> s390: qdio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> >> s390/sclp: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> >> s390/cio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> >> s390/scsi: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> >> s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
> >>
> >> Are all of these expected to land for -rc1? (Would it help to carry
> >> them in the timer tree?) I've got tree-wide changes ready to go once
> >> all these conversions have landed.
> >
> > These patches are parked on a private branches. The features branch
> > on s390/linux is the one that is used for -next AND for the upstream
> > merge. And since I do not want to rebase that branch the timer_setup
> > patches are not in -next as well.
> >
> > Four of you patches are safe with me, the s390/scsi patch is in
> > Steffens patch queue. All good I would say.
>
> Hi,
>
> I saw s390 get merged for -rc1, but none of these timer_setup()
> conversions were included. Given the possible short merge window,
> what's the state of these? I can't do the bulk API changes at the end
> of -rc1 without the s390 timer patches. Anything I can help with?
The remaining timer_setup changes are on the features branch of s390/linux,
I plan to send a please-pull request be the end of the week.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
From 1584217679054605343@xxx Thu Nov 16 10:21:52 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1582225047174802053
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread