On 30-Nov 17:12, Juri Lelli wrote:
> On 30/11/17 16:02, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > On 30-Nov 14:41, Juri Lelli wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > If the DL changes (which I shall post again as soon as tip/sched/core is
> > > bumped up to 4.15-rc1) get in first, this is going to be useless (as the
> > > DL kthread gets ignored by the scheduling class itself). But, this looks
> > > good to me "in the meantime".
> >
> > Just to better understand, you mean that the DL kthread does not send
> > out schedutil updates?
>
> It doesn't have a "proper" bandwidth (utilization) :/. So it gets
> "unnoticed" and schedutil updates are not triggered.
Ah, right... that was the "let CBS ignore this DL task" solution! ;-)
> >
> > If that's the case I agree we can discard this patch... that's also
> > one of the reasons why I move it at the end of this series.
>
> Not sure about this though, not my call :). I guess this still helps
> until we get the DL changes in.
Yes, agree... well Viresh had some concerns about this patch.
Let see what he thinks.
> Best,
>
> Juri
--
#include <best/regards.h>
Patrick Bellasi
From 1585508153816797603@xxx Thu Nov 30 16:13:24 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1585491510524518851
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread