Checkpatch in the kernel now complains about having the FSF address
in comments. Other tools such as rpmlint are now starting to do the
same thing. Remove the FSF address to reduce warnings on multiple tools.
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <[email protected]>
---
For context, I'm updating the packaging for the cpupower tools in Fedora which
requires a code/output review. This got flagged during that review.
---
tools/power/cpupower/lib/cpufreq.h | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/lib/cpufreq.h b/tools/power/cpupower/lib/cpufreq.h
index 3b005c39f068..60beaf5ed2ea 100644
--- a/tools/power/cpupower/lib/cpufreq.h
+++ b/tools/power/cpupower/lib/cpufreq.h
@@ -11,10 +11,6 @@
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
- *
- * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
- * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
- * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
*/
#ifndef __CPUPOWER_CPUFREQ_H__
--
2.14.3
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 05:16:29PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
>
> Checkpatch in the kernel now complains about having the FSF address
> in comments. Other tools such as rpmlint are now starting to do the
> same thing. Remove the FSF address to reduce warnings on multiple tools.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Dominik Brodowski <[email protected]>
On 12/15/2017 06:23 AM, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 05:16:29PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>
>> Checkpatch in the kernel now complains about having the FSF address
>> in comments. Other tools such as rpmlint are now starting to do the
>> same thing. Remove the FSF address to reduce warnings on multiple tools.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <[email protected]>
>
> Acked-by: Dominik Brodowski <[email protected]>
>
>
Thanks. I will apply this for 4.16-rc1
-- Shuah