2017-12-16 04:20:12

by Dave Young

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH V2] x86/efi: fix kernel param add_efi_memmap regression

'add_efi_memmap' is an early param, but do_add_efi_memmap() has no
chance to run because the code path is before parse_early_param().
I believe it worked when the param was introduced but probably later
some other changes caused the wrong order and nobody noticed it.

Move efi_memblock_x86_reserve_range() after parse_early_param()
to fix it.

Signed-off-by: Dave Young <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- linux-x86.orig/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ linux-x86/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -906,9 +906,6 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
set_bit(EFI_BOOT, &efi.flags);
set_bit(EFI_64BIT, &efi.flags);
}
-
- if (efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT))
- efi_memblock_x86_reserve_range();
#endif

x86_init.oem.arch_setup();
@@ -962,6 +959,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)

parse_early_param();

+ if (efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT))
+ efi_memblock_x86_reserve_range();
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
/*
* Memory used by the kernel cannot be hot-removed because Linux


2017-12-18 14:23:57

by Matt Fleming

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] x86/efi: fix kernel param add_efi_memmap regression

On Sat, 16 Dec, at 12:19:53PM, Dave Young wrote:
> 'add_efi_memmap' is an early param, but do_add_efi_memmap() has no
> chance to run because the code path is before parse_early_param().
> I believe it worked when the param was introduced but probably later
> some other changes caused the wrong order and nobody noticed it.
>
> Move efi_memblock_x86_reserve_range() after parse_early_param()
> to fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Young <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Thanks Dave, applied to 'urgent'.