2018-01-02 02:26:04

by Shawn Lin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] phy: rockchip-emmc: retry calpad busy trimming

It turns out that 5us isn't enough for all cases, so let's
retry some more times to wait for caldone.

Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <[email protected]>
---

drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
index f1b24f1..512a6ef 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
@@ -76,6 +76,10 @@
#define PHYCTRL_OTAPDLYSEL_MASK 0xf
#define PHYCTRL_OTAPDLYSEL_SHIFT 0x7

+#define PHYCTRL_IS_CALDONE(x) \
+ ((((x) >> PHYCTRL_CALDONE_SHIFT) & \
+ PHYCTRL_CALDONE_MASK) == PHYCTRL_CALDONE_DONE)
+
struct rockchip_emmc_phy {
unsigned int reg_offset;
struct regmap *reg_base;
@@ -160,15 +164,16 @@ static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power(struct phy *phy, bool on_off)
PHYCTRL_PDB_SHIFT));

/*
- * According to the user manual, it asks driver to
- * wait 5us for calpad busy trimming
+ * According to the user manual, it asks driver to wait 5us for
+ * calpad busy trimming. However it is documented that this value is
+ * PVT(A.K.A process,voltage and temperature) relevant, so some
+ * failure cases are found which indicates we should be more tolerant
+ * to calpad busy trimming.
*/
- udelay(5);
- regmap_read(rk_phy->reg_base,
- rk_phy->reg_offset + GRF_EMMCPHY_STATUS,
- &caldone);
- caldone = (caldone >> PHYCTRL_CALDONE_SHIFT) & PHYCTRL_CALDONE_MASK;
- if (caldone != PHYCTRL_CALDONE_DONE) {
+ if (regmap_read_poll_timeout(rk_phy->reg_base,
+ rk_phy->reg_offset + GRF_EMMCPHY_STATUS,
+ caldone, PHYCTRL_IS_CALDONE(caldone),
+ 5, 50)) {
pr_err("rockchip_emmc_phy_power: caldone timeout.\n");
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
--
1.9.1



2018-01-02 02:31:06

by Shawn Lin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] phy: rockchip-emmc: use regmap_read_poll_timeout to poll dllrdy

Just use the API instead of open-coding it, no functional change
intended.

Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <[email protected]>
---

drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c | 21 +++++++--------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
index 512a6ef..c65979b 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
@@ -79,6 +79,9 @@
#define PHYCTRL_IS_CALDONE(x) \
((((x) >> PHYCTRL_CALDONE_SHIFT) & \
PHYCTRL_CALDONE_MASK) == PHYCTRL_CALDONE_DONE)
+#define PHYCTRL_IS_DLLRDY(x) \
+ ((((x) >> PHYCTRL_DLLRDY_SHIFT) & \
+ PHYCTRL_DLLRDY_MASK) == PHYCTRL_DLLRDY_DONE)

struct rockchip_emmc_phy {
unsigned int reg_offset;
@@ -93,7 +96,6 @@ static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power(struct phy *phy, bool on_off)
unsigned int dllrdy;
unsigned int freqsel = PHYCTRL_FREQSEL_200M;
unsigned long rate;
- unsigned long timeout;

/*
* Keep phyctrl_pdb and phyctrl_endll low to allow
@@ -222,19 +224,10 @@ static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power(struct phy *phy, bool on_off)
* only at boot / resume. In both cases, eMMC is probably on the
* critical path so busy waiting a little extra time should be OK.
*/
- timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(50);
- do {
- udelay(1);
-
- regmap_read(rk_phy->reg_base,
- rk_phy->reg_offset + GRF_EMMCPHY_STATUS,
- &dllrdy);
- dllrdy = (dllrdy >> PHYCTRL_DLLRDY_SHIFT) & PHYCTRL_DLLRDY_MASK;
- if (dllrdy == PHYCTRL_DLLRDY_DONE)
- break;
- } while (!time_after(jiffies, timeout));
-
- if (dllrdy != PHYCTRL_DLLRDY_DONE) {
+ if (regmap_read_poll_timeout(rk_phy->reg_base,
+ rk_phy->reg_offset + GRF_EMMCPHY_STATUS,
+ dllrdy, PHYCTRL_IS_DLLRDY(dllrdy),
+ 1, 50 * USEC_PER_MSEC)) {
pr_err("rockchip_emmc_phy_power: dllrdy timeout.\n");
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
--
1.9.1


2018-01-04 09:10:44

by Ziyuan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] phy: rockchip-emmc: retry calpad busy trimming

hi ,

On 01/02/2018 10:21 AM, Shawn Lin wrote:
> It turns out that 5us isn't enough for all cases, so let's
> retry some more times to wait for caldone.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin<[email protected]>

Tested-by: Ziyuan Xu <[email protected]>
On the Firefly RK3399 board.

Thanks.

--
Ziyuan Xu


2018-01-05 01:32:46

by Caesar Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] phy: rockchip-emmc: retry calpad busy trimming

Hi Kishon & Shawn,

As the bug had tracked on https://issuetracker.google.com/71561742.

In some cases, the mmc phy power on failed during booting up.
The log as below:
...
[   2.375333] rockchip_emmc_phy_power: caldone timeout.
[    2.377815] phy phy-ff770000.syscon:[email protected]: phy poweron failed
--> -110
...
[    2.489295] mmc0: mmc_select_hs400es failed, error -110
[    2.489302] mmc0: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card
..


在 2018年01月02日 10:21, Shawn Lin 写道:
> It turns out that 5us isn't enough for all cases, so let's
> retry some more times to wait for caldone.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <[email protected]>

Tested-by: Caesar Wang <[email protected]>

I had tested on rk3399 chromebook, so feel free to add my tag.

-Caesar
> ---
>
> drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
> index f1b24f1..512a6ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
> @@ -76,6 +76,10 @@
> #define PHYCTRL_OTAPDLYSEL_MASK 0xf
> #define PHYCTRL_OTAPDLYSEL_SHIFT 0x7
>
> +#define PHYCTRL_IS_CALDONE(x) \
> + ((((x) >> PHYCTRL_CALDONE_SHIFT) & \
> + PHYCTRL_CALDONE_MASK) == PHYCTRL_CALDONE_DONE)
> +
> struct rockchip_emmc_phy {
> unsigned int reg_offset;
> struct regmap *reg_base;
> @@ -160,15 +164,16 @@ static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power(struct phy *phy, bool on_off)
> PHYCTRL_PDB_SHIFT));
>
> /*
> - * According to the user manual, it asks driver to
> - * wait 5us for calpad busy trimming
> + * According to the user manual, it asks driver to wait 5us for
> + * calpad busy trimming. However it is documented that this value is
> + * PVT(A.K.A process,voltage and temperature) relevant, so some
> + * failure cases are found which indicates we should be more tolerant
> + * to calpad busy trimming.
> */
> - udelay(5);
> - regmap_read(rk_phy->reg_base,
> - rk_phy->reg_offset + GRF_EMMCPHY_STATUS,
> - &caldone);
> - caldone = (caldone >> PHYCTRL_CALDONE_SHIFT) & PHYCTRL_CALDONE_MASK;
> - if (caldone != PHYCTRL_CALDONE_DONE) {
> + if (regmap_read_poll_timeout(rk_phy->reg_base,
> + rk_phy->reg_offset + GRF_EMMCPHY_STATUS,
> + caldone, PHYCTRL_IS_CALDONE(caldone),
> + 5, 50)) {
> pr_err("rockchip_emmc_phy_power: caldone timeout.\n");
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
> }


2018-01-05 02:07:56

by Brian Norris

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] phy: rockchip-emmc: use regmap_read_poll_timeout to poll dllrdy

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 10:22:00AM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
> Just use the API instead of open-coding it, no functional change
> intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c | 21 +++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
> index 512a6ef..c65979b 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
> @@ -79,6 +79,9 @@
> #define PHYCTRL_IS_CALDONE(x) \
> ((((x) >> PHYCTRL_CALDONE_SHIFT) & \
> PHYCTRL_CALDONE_MASK) == PHYCTRL_CALDONE_DONE)
> +#define PHYCTRL_IS_DLLRDY(x) \
> + ((((x) >> PHYCTRL_DLLRDY_SHIFT) & \
> + PHYCTRL_DLLRDY_MASK) == PHYCTRL_DLLRDY_DONE)
>
> struct rockchip_emmc_phy {
> unsigned int reg_offset;
> @@ -93,7 +96,6 @@ static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power(struct phy *phy, bool on_off)
> unsigned int dllrdy;
> unsigned int freqsel = PHYCTRL_FREQSEL_200M;
> unsigned long rate;
> - unsigned long timeout;
>
> /*
> * Keep phyctrl_pdb and phyctrl_endll low to allow
> @@ -222,19 +224,10 @@ static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power(struct phy *phy, bool on_off)
> * only at boot / resume. In both cases, eMMC is probably on the
> * critical path so busy waiting a little extra time should be OK.

^^ The above comments talk about busy-waiting, keeping this short, and
critical paths. With a sleeping implementation (like
regmap_read_poll_timeout()) that doesn't quite match, does it? I'd think
you might at least change the wording a little to avoid calling it "busy wait".

Brian

> */
> - timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(50);
> - do {
> - udelay(1);
> -
> - regmap_read(rk_phy->reg_base,
> - rk_phy->reg_offset + GRF_EMMCPHY_STATUS,
> - &dllrdy);
> - dllrdy = (dllrdy >> PHYCTRL_DLLRDY_SHIFT) & PHYCTRL_DLLRDY_MASK;
> - if (dllrdy == PHYCTRL_DLLRDY_DONE)
> - break;
> - } while (!time_after(jiffies, timeout));
> -
> - if (dllrdy != PHYCTRL_DLLRDY_DONE) {
> + if (regmap_read_poll_timeout(rk_phy->reg_base,
> + rk_phy->reg_offset + GRF_EMMCPHY_STATUS,
> + dllrdy, PHYCTRL_IS_DLLRDY(dllrdy),
> + 1, 50 * USEC_PER_MSEC)) {
> pr_err("rockchip_emmc_phy_power: dllrdy timeout.\n");
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
> }

2018-01-05 02:12:24

by Brian Norris

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] phy: rockchip-emmc: use regmap_read_poll_timeout to poll dllrdy

On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 06:07:51PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 10:22:00AM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
> > Just use the API instead of open-coding it, no functional change
> > intended.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <[email protected]>
> > ---

Other than my nit comment, looks fine:

Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <[email protected]>

2018-01-05 02:16:42

by Brian Norris

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] phy: rockchip-emmc: use regmap_read_poll_timeout to poll dllrdy

Sorry for the spam...one more thought:

On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 06:07:51PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 10:22:00AM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote:
> > Just use the API instead of open-coding it, no functional change
> > intended.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c | 21 +++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
> > index 512a6ef..c65979b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
> > @@ -79,6 +79,9 @@
> > #define PHYCTRL_IS_CALDONE(x) \
> > ((((x) >> PHYCTRL_CALDONE_SHIFT) & \
> > PHYCTRL_CALDONE_MASK) == PHYCTRL_CALDONE_DONE)
> > +#define PHYCTRL_IS_DLLRDY(x) \
> > + ((((x) >> PHYCTRL_DLLRDY_SHIFT) & \
> > + PHYCTRL_DLLRDY_MASK) == PHYCTRL_DLLRDY_DONE)
> >
> > struct rockchip_emmc_phy {
> > unsigned int reg_offset;
> > @@ -93,7 +96,6 @@ static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power(struct phy *phy, bool on_off)
> > unsigned int dllrdy;
> > unsigned int freqsel = PHYCTRL_FREQSEL_200M;
> > unsigned long rate;
> > - unsigned long timeout;
> >
> > /*
> > * Keep phyctrl_pdb and phyctrl_endll low to allow
> > @@ -222,19 +224,10 @@ static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power(struct phy *phy, bool on_off)
> > * only at boot / resume. In both cases, eMMC is probably on the
> > * critical path so busy waiting a little extra time should be OK.
>
> ^^ The above comments talk about busy-waiting, keeping this short, and
> critical paths. With a sleeping implementation (like
> regmap_read_poll_timeout()) that doesn't quite match, does it? I'd think
> you might at least change the wording a little to avoid calling it "busy wait".
>
> Brian
>
> > */
> > - timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(50);
> > - do {
> > - udelay(1);
> > -
> > - regmap_read(rk_phy->reg_base,
> > - rk_phy->reg_offset + GRF_EMMCPHY_STATUS,
> > - &dllrdy);
> > - dllrdy = (dllrdy >> PHYCTRL_DLLRDY_SHIFT) & PHYCTRL_DLLRDY_MASK;
> > - if (dllrdy == PHYCTRL_DLLRDY_DONE)
> > - break;
> > - } while (!time_after(jiffies, timeout));
> > -
> > - if (dllrdy != PHYCTRL_DLLRDY_DONE) {
> > + if (regmap_read_poll_timeout(rk_phy->reg_base,

regmap_read_poll_timeout() checks for regmap_read() errors and aborts on
error, so it's misleading to just report ETIMEDOUT below. Why don't you
save 'ret', print it in the pr_err() message, and propagate the error
code?

Same for patch 1.

Brian

> > + rk_phy->reg_offset + GRF_EMMCPHY_STATUS,
> > + dllrdy, PHYCTRL_IS_DLLRDY(dllrdy),
> > + 1, 50 * USEC_PER_MSEC)) {
> > pr_err("rockchip_emmc_phy_power: dllrdy timeout.\n");
> > return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > }