Replace the repeated multiplication in the main loop
body calculation of zspage_size with an equivalent
(and cheaper) addition operation.
Signed-off-by: Joey Pabalinas <[email protected]>
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
index c3013505c30527dc42..647a1a2728634b5194 100644
--- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
@@ -821,15 +821,15 @@ static enum fullness_group fix_fullness_group(struct size_class *class,
*/
static int get_pages_per_zspage(int class_size)
{
+ int zspage_size = 0;
int i, max_usedpc = 0;
/* zspage order which gives maximum used size per KB */
int max_usedpc_order = 1;
for (i = 1; i <= ZS_MAX_PAGES_PER_ZSPAGE; i++) {
- int zspage_size;
int waste, usedpc;
- zspage_size = i * PAGE_SIZE;
+ zspage_size += PAGE_SIZE;
waste = zspage_size % class_size;
usedpc = (zspage_size - waste) * 100 / zspage_size;
--
2.16.2
Hi Joey,
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 02:21:26AM -1000, Joey Pabalinas wrote:
> Replace the repeated multiplication in the main loop
> body calculation of zspage_size with an equivalent
> (and cheaper) addition operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joey Pabalinas <[email protected]>
>
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> index c3013505c30527dc42..647a1a2728634b5194 100644
> --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> @@ -821,15 +821,15 @@ static enum fullness_group fix_fullness_group(struct size_class *class,
> */
> static int get_pages_per_zspage(int class_size)
> {
> + int zspage_size = 0;
> int i, max_usedpc = 0;
> /* zspage order which gives maximum used size per KB */
> int max_usedpc_order = 1;
>
> for (i = 1; i <= ZS_MAX_PAGES_PER_ZSPAGE; i++) {
> - int zspage_size;
> int waste, usedpc;
>
> - zspage_size = i * PAGE_SIZE;
> + zspage_size += PAGE_SIZE;
> waste = zspage_size % class_size;
> usedpc = (zspage_size - waste) * 100 / zspage_size;
>
Thanks for the patch! However, it's used only zs_create_pool which
is really cold path so I don't feel it would improve for real practice.
Thanks.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 09:03:19AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Thanks for the patch! However, it's used only zs_create_pool which
> is really cold path so I don't feel it would improve for real practice.
Very true; in retrospect this this definitely isn't a very hot path at
all, haha. Cheers :)
--
Joey Pabalinas