Due to an inverted logic mistake in xfs_buftarg_isolate()
the xfs_buffers with zero b_lru_ref will take another trip
around LRU, while isolating buffers with non-zero b_lru_ref.
Additionally those isolated buffers end up right back on the LRU
once they are released, because b_lru_ref remains elevated.
Fix that circuitous route by leaving them on the LRU
as originally intended.
Signed-off-by: Vratislav Bendel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
index d1da2ee9e6db..ac669a10c62f 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
@@ -1708,7 +1708,7 @@ xfs_buftarg_isolate(
* zero. If the value is already zero, we need to reclaim the
* buffer, otherwise it gets another trip through the LRU.
*/
- if (!atomic_add_unless(&bp->b_lru_ref, -1, 0)) {
+ if (atomic_add_unless(&bp->b_lru_ref, -1, 0)) {
spin_unlock(&bp->b_lock);
return LRU_ROTATE;
}
--
2.14.3
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 11:26:38AM +0100, Vratislav Bendel wrote:
> Due to an inverted logic mistake in xfs_buftarg_isolate()
> the xfs_buffers with zero b_lru_ref will take another trip
> around LRU, while isolating buffers with non-zero b_lru_ref.
>
> Additionally those isolated buffers end up right back on the LRU
> once they are released, because b_lru_ref remains elevated.
>
> Fix that circuitous route by leaving them on the LRU
> as originally intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vratislav Bendel <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
Looks ok, tests ok...
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index d1da2ee9e6db..ac669a10c62f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -1708,7 +1708,7 @@ xfs_buftarg_isolate(
> * zero. If the value is already zero, we need to reclaim the
> * buffer, otherwise it gets another trip through the LRU.
> */
> - if (!atomic_add_unless(&bp->b_lru_ref, -1, 0)) {
> + if (atomic_add_unless(&bp->b_lru_ref, -1, 0)) {
> spin_unlock(&bp->b_lock);
> return LRU_ROTATE;
> }
> --
> 2.14.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>