From: Sean Wang <[email protected]>
Since the offset for both registers, PWMDWIDTH and PWMTHRES, used to
control PWM4 or PWM5 are distinct from the other PWMs, whose wrong
programming on PWM hardware causes waveform cannot be output as expected.
Thus, the patch adds the extra condition for fixing up the weird case to
let PWM4 or PWM5 able to work on MT7623.
v1 -> v2: use pwm45_fixup naming instead of pwm45_quirk
v2 -> v3: add more tags for Reviewed-by, Fixes, and Cc stable
Cc: [email protected]
Fixes: caf065f8fd58 ("pwm: Add MediaTek PWM support")
Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <[email protected]>
Cc: Zhi Mao <[email protected]>
Cc: John Crispin <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <[email protected]>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
index f5d97e0..796baea 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
@@ -29,7 +29,9 @@
#define PWMGDUR 0x0c
#define PWMWAVENUM 0x28
#define PWMDWIDTH 0x2c
+#define PWM45DWIDTH_FIXUP 0x30
#define PWMTHRES 0x30
+#define PWM45THRES_FIXUP 0x34
#define PWM_CLK_DIV_MAX 7
@@ -54,6 +56,7 @@ static const char * const mtk_pwm_clk_name[MTK_CLK_MAX] = {
struct mtk_pwm_platform_data {
unsigned int num_pwms;
+ bool pwm45_fixup;
};
/**
@@ -66,6 +69,7 @@ struct mtk_pwm_chip {
struct pwm_chip chip;
void __iomem *regs;
struct clk *clks[MTK_CLK_MAX];
+ const struct mtk_pwm_platform_data *soc;
};
static const unsigned int mtk_pwm_reg_offset[] = {
@@ -131,7 +135,8 @@ static int mtk_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
{
struct mtk_pwm_chip *pc = to_mtk_pwm_chip(chip);
struct clk *clk = pc->clks[MTK_CLK_PWM1 + pwm->hwpwm];
- u32 resolution, clkdiv = 0;
+ u32 resolution, clkdiv = 0, reg_width = PWMDWIDTH,
+ reg_thres = PWMTHRES;
int ret;
ret = mtk_pwm_clk_enable(chip, pwm);
@@ -151,9 +156,18 @@ static int mtk_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (pc->soc->pwm45_fixup && pwm->hwpwm > 2) {
+ /*
+ * PWM[4,5] has distinct offset for PWMDWIDTH and PWMTHRES
+ * from the other PWMs on MT7623.
+ */
+ reg_width = PWM45DWIDTH_FIXUP;
+ reg_thres = PWM45THRES_FIXUP;
+ }
+
mtk_pwm_writel(pc, pwm->hwpwm, PWMCON, BIT(15) | clkdiv);
- mtk_pwm_writel(pc, pwm->hwpwm, PWMDWIDTH, period_ns / resolution);
- mtk_pwm_writel(pc, pwm->hwpwm, PWMTHRES, duty_ns / resolution);
+ mtk_pwm_writel(pc, pwm->hwpwm, reg_width, period_ns / resolution);
+ mtk_pwm_writel(pc, pwm->hwpwm, reg_thres, duty_ns / resolution);
mtk_pwm_clk_disable(chip, pwm);
@@ -211,6 +225,7 @@ static int mtk_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
if (data == NULL)
return -EINVAL;
+ pc->soc = data;
res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
pc->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
@@ -251,14 +266,17 @@ static int mtk_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
static const struct mtk_pwm_platform_data mt2712_pwm_data = {
.num_pwms = 8,
+ .pwm45_fixup = false,
};
static const struct mtk_pwm_platform_data mt7622_pwm_data = {
.num_pwms = 6,
+ .pwm45_fixup = false,
};
static const struct mtk_pwm_platform_data mt7623_pwm_data = {
.num_pwms = 5,
+ .pwm45_fixup = true,
};
static const struct of_device_id mtk_pwm_of_match[] = {
--
2.7.4
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 04:19:12PM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Sean Wang <[email protected]>
>
> Since the offset for both registers, PWMDWIDTH and PWMTHRES, used to
> control PWM4 or PWM5 are distinct from the other PWMs, whose wrong
> programming on PWM hardware causes waveform cannot be output as expected.
> Thus, the patch adds the extra condition for fixing up the weird case to
> let PWM4 or PWM5 able to work on MT7623.
>
> v1 -> v2: use pwm45_fixup naming instead of pwm45_quirk
> v2 -> v3: add more tags for Reviewed-by, Fixes, and Cc stable
>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Fixes: caf065f8fd58 ("pwm: Add MediaTek PWM support")
> Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <[email protected]>
> Cc: Zhi Mao <[email protected]>
> Cc: John Crispin <[email protected]>
> Cc: Matthias Brugger <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
[...]
> @@ -151,9 +156,18 @@ static int mtk_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + if (pc->soc->pwm45_fixup && pwm->hwpwm > 2) {
> + /*
> + * PWM[4,5] has distinct offset for PWMDWIDTH and PWMTHRES
> + * from the other PWMs on MT7623.
> + */
> + reg_width = PWM45DWIDTH_FIXUP;
> + reg_thres = PWM45THRES_FIXUP;
> + }
I don't understand this. According to the condition above the above
would also use the PWM[4,5] "fixup" register offsets with PWM[3]. Should
the condition be pwm->hwpwm > 3?
Thierry
On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 11:57 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 04:19:12PM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
> > From: Sean Wang <[email protected]>
> >
> > Since the offset for both registers, PWMDWIDTH and PWMTHRES, used to
> > control PWM4 or PWM5 are distinct from the other PWMs, whose wrong
> > programming on PWM hardware causes waveform cannot be output as expected.
> > Thus, the patch adds the extra condition for fixing up the weird case to
> > let PWM4 or PWM5 able to work on MT7623.
> >
> > v1 -> v2: use pwm45_fixup naming instead of pwm45_quirk
> > v2 -> v3: add more tags for Reviewed-by, Fixes, and Cc stable
> >
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Fixes: caf065f8fd58 ("pwm: Add MediaTek PWM support")
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Zhi Mao <[email protected]>
> > Cc: John Crispin <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Matthias Brugger <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
> [...]
> > @@ -151,9 +156,18 @@ static int mtk_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > + if (pc->soc->pwm45_fixup && pwm->hwpwm > 2) {
> > + /*
> > + * PWM[4,5] has distinct offset for PWMDWIDTH and PWMTHRES
> > + * from the other PWMs on MT7623.
> > + */
> > + reg_width = PWM45DWIDTH_FIXUP;
> > + reg_thres = PWM45THRES_FIXUP;
> > + }
>
> I don't understand this. According to the condition above the above
> would also use the PWM[4,5] "fixup" register offsets with PWM[3]. Should
> the condition be pwm->hwpwm > 3?
>
> Thierry
PWM[4,5] are the naming specified in datasheet and kept it as is here
and driver or userspace would use index 3 and 4 to have a reference to
them respectively.
On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 06:34:50AM +0800, Sean Wang wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 11:57 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 04:19:12PM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
> > > From: Sean Wang <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > Since the offset for both registers, PWMDWIDTH and PWMTHRES, used to
> > > control PWM4 or PWM5 are distinct from the other PWMs, whose wrong
> > > programming on PWM hardware causes waveform cannot be output as expected.
> > > Thus, the patch adds the extra condition for fixing up the weird case to
> > > let PWM4 or PWM5 able to work on MT7623.
> > >
> > > v1 -> v2: use pwm45_fixup naming instead of pwm45_quirk
> > > v2 -> v3: add more tags for Reviewed-by, Fixes, and Cc stable
> > >
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > Fixes: caf065f8fd58 ("pwm: Add MediaTek PWM support")
> > > Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <[email protected]>
> > > Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Zhi Mao <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: John Crispin <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Matthias Brugger <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
Thierry