On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 02:34:52AM +0000, David Wang wrote:
> Those are new processors and main usage of CentaurHauls CPUs in recent
> years is for limited and/or embedded instead of distribution markets.
> So there is no plan or resource to create such document for public
> access. Is public spec mandatory for code check-in? We can provide
> platforms for verification instead.
Nah, not needed. As long as the code paths don't break anything else and
as long as we can CC you to fix bugs people report, we're good. :-)
Btw, please do not top-post on a public ML.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Borislav Petkov [mailto:[email protected]]
> 发送时间: 2018年4月4日 19:18
> 收件人: David Wang <[email protected]>
> 抄送: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; Bruce Chang (VAS)
> <[email protected]>; Cooper Yan(BJ-RD)
> <[email protected]>; Qiyuan Wang(BJ-RD)
> <[email protected]>; Benjamin Pan <[email protected]>;
> Luke Lin <[email protected]>; Tim Guo(BJ-RD) <[email protected]>
> 主题: Re: 答复: [PATCH 1/2] x86/mce: new centaur CPUs support MCE
> broadcasting
>
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 02:34:52AM +0000, David Wang wrote:
> > Those are new processors and main usage of CentaurHauls CPUs in recent
> > years is for limited and/or embedded instead of distribution markets.
> > So there is no plan or resource to create such document for public
> > access. Is public spec mandatory for code check-in? We can provide
> > platforms for verification instead.
>
> Nah, not needed. As long as the code paths don't break anything else and as
> long as we can CC you to fix bugs people report, we're good. :-)
>
> Btw, please do not top-post on a public ML.
I got it.
Thanks.
---
David
>
> Thx.
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.