Prefer bool over int for variables / returns which are
predicate expressions to make it explicit that these
expressions are evaluating simple "yes or no?" queries.
This makes it more obvious which expressions are _not_
that simple and require more attention, e.g. an `int ret`
meant to hold 0 or -ENOENT as a return value or an
`unsigned nmemb` meant to refer to the number of valid
members in some arbitrary array.
Change relevant variable / return types from int to bool and
prefer a true / false value for predicate expressions versus
a plain 1 / 0 value.
Signed-off-by: Joey Pabalinas <[email protected]>
drivers/acpi/battery.c | 4 ++--
drivers/acpi/ec.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 17 ++++++-----------
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 6 +++---
include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 2 +-
5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
index bdb24d636d9acc9c1a..f1a5fb5252969f0478 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
@@ -1416,7 +1416,7 @@ static int acpi_battery_add(struct acpi_device *device)
battery->pm_nb.notifier_call = battery_notify;
register_pm_notifier(&battery->pm_nb);
- device_init_wakeup(&device->dev, 1);
+ device_init_wakeup(&device->dev, true);
return result;
@@ -1434,7 +1434,7 @@ static int acpi_battery_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
if (!device || !acpi_driver_data(device))
return -EINVAL;
- device_init_wakeup(&device->dev, 0);
+ device_init_wakeup(&device->dev, false);
battery = acpi_driver_data(device);
unregister_pm_notifier(&battery->pm_nb);
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
index 30a5729565575f83cb..d4a564ab9cdd53046c 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static inline bool acpi_ec_is_gpe_raised(struct acpi_ec *ec)
acpi_event_status gpe_status = 0;
(void)acpi_get_gpe_status(NULL, ec->gpe, &gpe_status);
- return (gpe_status & ACPI_EVENT_FLAG_STATUS_SET) ? true : false;
+ return gpe_status & ACPI_EVENT_FLAG_STATUS_SET;
}
static inline void acpi_ec_enable_gpe(struct acpi_ec *ec, bool open)
@@ -580,28 +580,26 @@ static bool acpi_ec_guard_event(struct acpi_ec *ec)
return guarded;
}
-static int ec_transaction_polled(struct acpi_ec *ec)
+static bool ec_transaction_polled(struct acpi_ec *ec)
{
unsigned long flags;
- int ret = 0;
+ bool polled;
spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
- if (ec->curr && (ec->curr->flags & ACPI_EC_COMMAND_POLL))
- ret = 1;
+ polled = ec->curr && (ec->curr->flags & ACPI_EC_COMMAND_POLL);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
- return ret;
+ return polled;
}
-static int ec_transaction_completed(struct acpi_ec *ec)
+static bool ec_transaction_completed(struct acpi_ec *ec)
{
unsigned long flags;
- int ret = 0;
+ bool completed;
spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
- if (ec->curr && (ec->curr->flags & ACPI_EC_COMMAND_COMPLETE))
- ret = 1;
+ completed = ec->curr && (ec->curr->flags & ACPI_EC_COMMAND_COMPLETE);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
- return ret;
+ return completed;
}
static inline void ec_transaction_transition(struct acpi_ec *ec, unsigned long flag)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
index 6fc204a524932e97f4..61c0c079cff346e492 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -81,20 +81,15 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(osc_lock);
* Note: we could make this API take a struct acpi_device * instead, but
* for now, it's more convenient to operate on an acpi_handle.
*/
-int acpi_is_root_bridge(acpi_handle handle)
+bool acpi_is_root_bridge(acpi_handle handle)
{
- int ret;
struct acpi_device *device;
- ret = acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device);
- if (ret)
- return 0;
-
- ret = acpi_match_device_ids(device, root_device_ids);
- if (ret)
- return 0;
- else
- return 1;
+ if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device))
+ return false;
+ if (acpi_match_device_ids(device, root_device_ids))
+ return false;
+ return true;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_is_root_bridge);
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index 490498eca0d3db7d6a..8e3d436184104b5799 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ int acpi_device_add(struct acpi_device *device,
{
int result;
struct acpi_device_bus_id *acpi_device_bus_id, *new_bus_id;
- int found = 0;
+ bool found = false;
if (device->handle) {
acpi_status status;
@@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ int acpi_device_add(struct acpi_device *device,
if (!strcmp(acpi_device_bus_id->bus_id,
acpi_device_hid(device))) {
acpi_device_bus_id->instance_no++;
- found = 1;
+ found = true;
kfree(new_bus_id);
break;
}
@@ -1787,7 +1787,7 @@ static void acpi_device_dep_initialize(struct acpi_device *adev)
for (i = 0; i < dep_devices.count; i++) {
struct acpi_device_info *info;
- int skip;
+ bool skip;
status = acpi_get_object_info(dep_devices.handles[i], &info);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
index c9608b0b80c602a7df..4504da12c43daa0f6c 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ void acpi_dma_deconfigure(struct device *dev);
struct acpi_device *acpi_find_child_device(struct acpi_device *parent,
u64 address, bool check_children);
-int acpi_is_root_bridge(acpi_handle);
+bool acpi_is_root_bridge(acpi_handle handle);
struct acpi_pci_root *acpi_pci_find_root(acpi_handle handle);
int acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(struct acpi_device *dev, int state);
--
2.17.0.rc1.35.g90bbd502d54fe92035.dirty
On Sunday, April 8, 2018 10:46:27 AM CEST Joey Pabalinas wrote:
>
> --dohnnvt2hwn6rmo4
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Prefer bool over int for variables / returns which are
> predicate expressions to make it explicit that these
> expressions are evaluating simple "yes or no?" queries.
In new code - yes.
But changing old code just for this purpose is at least questionable.
> This makes it more obvious which expressions are _not_
> that simple and require more attention, e.g. an `int ret`
> meant to hold 0 or -ENOENT as a return value or an
> `unsigned nmemb` meant to refer to the number of valid
> members in some arbitrary array.
>
> Change relevant variable / return types from int to bool and
> prefer a true / false value for predicate expressions versus
> a plain 1 / 0 value.
This makes a bunch of unrelated changes without a clear pattern
in many places and I'm not convinced that the reason is good enough.
> Signed-off-by: Joey Pabalinas <[email protected]>
>
> drivers/acpi/battery.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/acpi/ec.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 17 ++++++-----------
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 6 +++---
> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> index bdb24d636d9acc9c1a..f1a5fb5252969f0478 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
> @@ -1416,7 +1416,7 @@ static int acpi_battery_add(struct acpi_device *devic=
> e)
> battery->pm_nb.notifier_call =3D battery_notify;
> register_pm_notifier(&battery->pm_nb);
> =20
Broken whitespace.
> - device_init_wakeup(&device->dev, 1);
> + device_init_wakeup(&device->dev, true);
> =20
> return result;
> =20
> @@ -1434,7 +1434,7 @@ static int acpi_battery_remove(struct acpi_device *de=
> vice)
> =20
> if (!device || !acpi_driver_data(device))
> return -EINVAL;
> - device_init_wakeup(&device->dev, 0);
> + device_init_wakeup(&device->dev, false);
> battery =3D acpi_driver_data(device);
> unregister_pm_notifier(&battery->pm_nb);
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> index 30a5729565575f83cb..d4a564ab9cdd53046c 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static inline bool acpi_ec_is_gpe_raised(struct acpi_ec=
> *ec)
> acpi_event_status gpe_status =3D 0;
> =20
> (void)acpi_get_gpe_status(NULL, ec->gpe, &gpe_status);
> - return (gpe_status & ACPI_EVENT_FLAG_STATUS_SET) ? true : false;
> + return gpe_status & ACPI_EVENT_FLAG_STATUS_SET;
And this isn't entirely correct even.
You should apply !! to the expression to get the same result really.
Thanks,
Rafael