2018-07-23 17:58:17

by Anton Vasilyev

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: HID: intel_ish-hid: tx_buf memory leak on probe/remove

ish_dev_init() allocates 512*176 bytes memory for tx_buf and stores it at
&dev->wr_free_list_head.link list on ish_probe().
But there is no deallocation of this memory in ish_remove() and in
ish_probe()
error path.
So current intel-ish-ipc provides 88 KB memory leak for each probe/release.

I have two ideas 1) to replace kzalloc allocation by devm_kzalloc,
or 2) release memory stored at &dev->wr_free_list_head.link list (and
may be at
&dev->wr_processing_list_head.link) in all driver exits.

But I do not know which way is preferable for this case.

Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).

--
Anton Vasilyev
Linux Verification Center, ISPRAS
web: http://linuxtesting.org
e-mail: [email protected]


2018-07-23 21:57:16

by srinivas pandruvada

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: HID: intel_ish-hid: tx_buf memory leak on probe/remove

On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 20:56 +0300, Anton Vasilyev wrote:
> ish_dev_init() allocates 512*176 bytes memory for tx_buf and stores
> it at
> &dev->wr_free_list_head.link list on ish_probe().
> But there is no deallocation of this memory in ish_remove() and in
> ish_probe()
> error path.
> So current intel-ish-ipc provides 88 KB memory leak for each
> probe/release.
>
> I have two ideas 1) to replace kzalloc allocation by devm_kzalloc,
Thanks for finding this. We can replace both alloc in this function
with devm_ calls. Once you have a patch I can test.

Thanks,
Srinivas

> or 2) release memory stored at &dev->wr_free_list_head.link list
> (and
> may be at
> &dev->wr_processing_list_head.link) in all driver exits.
>
> But I do not know which way is preferable for this case.
>
> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
>
> --
> Anton Vasilyev
> Linux Verification Center, ISPRAS
> web: http://linuxtesting.org
> e-mail: [email protected]

2018-07-24 14:37:17

by Anton Vasilyev

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] HID: intel_ish-hid: tx_buf memory leak on probe/remove

ish_dev_init() allocates 512*176 bytes memory for tx_buf and stores it at
&dev->wr_free_list_head.link list on ish_probe().
But there is no deallocation of this memory in ish_remove() and in
ish_probe() error path.
So current intel-ish-ipc provides 88 KB memory leak for each
probe/release.

The patch replaces kzalloc allocation by devm_kzalloc and removes
ishtp_device *dev deallocation by kfree.

Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).

Signed-off-by: Anton Vasilyev <[email protected]>
---
drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c | 7 +++++--
drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c
index 9a60ec13cb10..2f8e5402b450 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c
@@ -907,7 +907,8 @@ struct ishtp_device *ish_dev_init(struct pci_dev *pdev)
struct ishtp_device *dev;
int i;

- dev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ishtp_device) + sizeof(struct ish_hw),
+ dev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
+ sizeof(struct ishtp_device) + sizeof(struct ish_hw),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!dev)
return NULL;
@@ -925,7 +926,9 @@ struct ishtp_device *ish_dev_init(struct pci_dev *pdev)
for (i = 0; i < IPC_TX_FIFO_SIZE; ++i) {
struct wr_msg_ctl_info *tx_buf;

- tx_buf = kzalloc(sizeof(struct wr_msg_ctl_info), GFP_KERNEL);
+ tx_buf = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
+ sizeof(struct wr_msg_ctl_info),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tx_buf) {
/*
* IPC buffers may be limited or not available
diff --git a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c
index a2c53ea3b5ed..81d035a480bc 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c
@@ -172,7 +172,6 @@ static int ish_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
free_irq(pdev->irq, dev);
free_device:
pci_iounmap(pdev, hw->mem_addr);
- kfree(dev);
release_regions:
pci_release_regions(pdev);
disable_device:
@@ -202,7 +201,6 @@ static void ish_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
pci_release_regions(pdev);
pci_clear_master(pdev);
pci_disable_device(pdev);
- kfree(ishtp_dev);
}

static struct device __maybe_unused *ish_resume_device;
--
2.18.0


2018-07-30 01:37:13

by srinivas pandruvada

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: intel_ish-hid: tx_buf memory leak on probe/remove

On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 17:34 +0300, Anton Vasilyev wrote:
> ish_dev_init() allocates 512*176 bytes memory for tx_buf and stores
> it at
> &dev->wr_free_list_head.link list on ish_probe().
> But there is no deallocation of this memory in ish_remove() and in
> ish_probe() error path.
> So current intel-ish-ipc provides 88 KB memory leak for each
> probe/release.
>
> The patch replaces kzalloc allocation by devm_kzalloc and removes
> ishtp_device *dev deallocation by kfree.
>
> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
>
I prefer align with "(" for the next line for multi line statements
even if character /line > slightly over 80. If you can do that resubmit
with my ACK below.

> Signed-off-by: Anton Vasilyev <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <[email protected]>

> ---
> drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c | 7 +++++--
> drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c b/drivers/hid/intel-
> ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c
> index 9a60ec13cb10..2f8e5402b450 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c
> @@ -907,7 +907,8 @@ struct ishtp_device *ish_dev_init(struct pci_dev
> *pdev)
> struct ishtp_device *dev;
> int i;
>
> - dev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ishtp_device) + sizeof(struct
> ish_hw),
> + dev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> + sizeof(struct ishtp_device) + sizeof(struct ish_hw),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!dev)
> return NULL;
> @@ -925,7 +926,9 @@ struct ishtp_device *ish_dev_init(struct pci_dev
> *pdev)
> for (i = 0; i < IPC_TX_FIFO_SIZE; ++i) {
> struct wr_msg_ctl_info *tx_buf;
>
> - tx_buf = kzalloc(sizeof(struct wr_msg_ctl_info),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> + tx_buf = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> + sizeof(struct wr_msg_ctl_info),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!tx_buf) {
> /*
> * IPC buffers may be limited or not
> available
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c
> b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c
> index a2c53ea3b5ed..81d035a480bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c
> @@ -172,7 +172,6 @@ static int ish_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const
> struct pci_device_id *ent)
> free_irq(pdev->irq, dev);
> free_device:
> pci_iounmap(pdev, hw->mem_addr);
> - kfree(dev);
> release_regions:
> pci_release_regions(pdev);
> disable_device:
> @@ -202,7 +201,6 @@ static void ish_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> pci_release_regions(pdev);
> pci_clear_master(pdev);
> pci_disable_device(pdev);
> - kfree(ishtp_dev);
> }
>
> static struct device __maybe_unused *ish_resume_device;

2018-08-01 11:28:56

by Anton Vasilyev

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2] HID: intel_ish-hid: tx_buf memory leak on probe/remove

ish_dev_init() allocates 512*176 bytes memory for tx_buf and stores it at
&dev->wr_free_list_head.link list on ish_probe().
But there is no deallocation of this memory in ish_remove() and in
ish_probe() error path.
So current intel-ish-ipc provides 88 KB memory leak for each
probe/release.

The patch replaces kzalloc allocation by devm_kzalloc and removes
ishtp_device *dev deallocation by kfree.

Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).

Signed-off-by: Anton Vasilyev <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <[email protected]>
---
v2: Fix align for multi line statements
---
drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c | 9 ++++++---
drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c
index 9a60ec13cb10..bfbca7ec54ce 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/ipc.c
@@ -907,8 +907,9 @@ struct ishtp_device *ish_dev_init(struct pci_dev *pdev)
struct ishtp_device *dev;
int i;

- dev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ishtp_device) + sizeof(struct ish_hw),
- GFP_KERNEL);
+ dev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
+ sizeof(struct ishtp_device) + sizeof(struct ish_hw),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
if (!dev)
return NULL;

@@ -925,7 +926,9 @@ struct ishtp_device *ish_dev_init(struct pci_dev *pdev)
for (i = 0; i < IPC_TX_FIFO_SIZE; ++i) {
struct wr_msg_ctl_info *tx_buf;

- tx_buf = kzalloc(sizeof(struct wr_msg_ctl_info), GFP_KERNEL);
+ tx_buf = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
+ sizeof(struct wr_msg_ctl_info),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tx_buf) {
/*
* IPC buffers may be limited or not available
diff --git a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c
index a2c53ea3b5ed..81d035a480bc 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c
@@ -172,7 +172,6 @@ static int ish_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
free_irq(pdev->irq, dev);
free_device:
pci_iounmap(pdev, hw->mem_addr);
- kfree(dev);
release_regions:
pci_release_regions(pdev);
disable_device:
@@ -202,7 +201,6 @@ static void ish_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
pci_release_regions(pdev);
pci_clear_master(pdev);
pci_disable_device(pdev);
- kfree(ishtp_dev);
}

static struct device __maybe_unused *ish_resume_device;
--
2.18.0


2018-08-02 11:29:45

by Jiri Kosina

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] HID: intel_ish-hid: tx_buf memory leak on probe/remove

On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, Anton Vasilyev wrote:

> ish_dev_init() allocates 512*176 bytes memory for tx_buf and stores it at
> &dev->wr_free_list_head.link list on ish_probe().
> But there is no deallocation of this memory in ish_remove() and in
> ish_probe() error path.
> So current intel-ish-ipc provides 88 KB memory leak for each
> probe/release.
>
> The patch replaces kzalloc allocation by devm_kzalloc and removes
> ishtp_device *dev deallocation by kfree.
>
> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Vasilyev <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <[email protected]>
> ---
> v2: Fix align for multi line statements

Applied, thanks.

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs