On i.MX6UL, accessing OCOTP directly is wrong because the ocotp clock
needs to be enabled first, so use the nvmem-cells binding instead.
Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <[email protected]>
---
no change since V1.
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul.dtsi | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul.dtsi
index 5ef4320..ff8c6de 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul.dtsi
@@ -89,6 +89,8 @@
"pll1_sys";
arm-supply = <®_arm>;
soc-supply = <®_soc>;
+ nvmem-cells = <&cpu_speed_grade>;
+ nvmem-cell-names = "speed_grade";
};
};
@@ -943,6 +945,10 @@
tempmon_temp_grade: temp-grade@20 {
reg = <0x20 4>;
};
+
+ cpu_speed_grade: speed-grade@10 {
+ reg = <0x10 4>;
+ };
};
lcdif: lcdif@21c8000 {
--
2.7.4
On i.MX6UL/i.MX6ULL, accessing OCOTP directly is wrong because
the ocotp clock needs to be enabled first. Add support for reading
OCOTP through the nvmem API, and keep the old method there to
support old dtb.
Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <[email protected]>
---
changes since V1:
add old dtb support.
drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
index b2ff423..518386c4 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_address.h>
#include <linux/pm_opp.h>
@@ -290,20 +291,32 @@ static void imx6q_opp_check_speed_grading(struct device *dev)
#define OCOTP_CFG3_6ULL_SPEED_792MHZ 0x2
#define OCOTP_CFG3_6ULL_SPEED_900MHZ 0x3
-static void imx6ul_opp_check_speed_grading(struct device *dev)
+static int imx6ul_opp_check_speed_grading(struct device *dev)
{
- struct device_node *np;
- void __iomem *base;
u32 val;
+ int ret = 0;
- np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,imx6ul-ocotp");
- if (!np)
- return;
+ if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "nvmem-cells", NULL)) {
+ ret = nvmem_cell_read_u32(dev, "speed_grade", &val);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ } else {
+ struct device_node *np;
+ void __iomem *base;
+
+ np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,imx6ul-ocotp");
+ if (!np)
+ return -ENOENT;
+
+ base = of_iomap(np, 0);
+ if (!base) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to map ocotp\n");
+ of_node_put(np);
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
- base = of_iomap(np, 0);
- if (!base) {
- dev_err(dev, "failed to map ocotp\n");
- goto put_node;
+ val = readl_relaxed(base + OCOTP_CFG3);
+ iounmap(base);
}
/*
@@ -314,7 +327,6 @@ static void imx6ul_opp_check_speed_grading(struct device *dev)
* 2b'11: 900000000Hz on i.MX6ULL only;
* We need to set the max speed of ARM according to fuse map.
*/
- val = readl_relaxed(base + OCOTP_CFG3);
val >>= OCOTP_CFG3_SPEED_SHIFT;
val &= 0x3;
@@ -334,9 +346,7 @@ static void imx6ul_opp_check_speed_grading(struct device *dev)
dev_warn(dev, "failed to disable 900MHz OPP\n");
}
- iounmap(base);
-put_node:
- of_node_put(np);
+ return ret;
}
static int imx6q_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -394,10 +404,18 @@ static int imx6q_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ul") ||
- of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ull"))
- imx6ul_opp_check_speed_grading(cpu_dev);
- else
+ of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6ull")) {
+ ret = imx6ul_opp_check_speed_grading(cpu_dev);
+ if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ return ret;
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to read ocotp: %d\n",
+ ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ } else {
imx6q_opp_check_speed_grading(cpu_dev);
+ }
/* Because we have added the OPPs here, we must free them */
free_opp = true;
--
2.7.4
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 11:17:43AM +0800, Anson Huang wrote:
> On i.MX6UL, accessing OCOTP directly is wrong because the ocotp clock
> needs to be enabled first, so use the nvmem-cells binding instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <[email protected]>
> ---
> no change since V1.
Okay, I just applied v1 of this patch.
Shawn
On 17-09-18, 11:17, Anson Huang wrote:
> On i.MX6UL/i.MX6ULL, accessing OCOTP directly is wrong because
> the ocotp clock needs to be enabled first. Add support for reading
> OCOTP through the nvmem API, and keep the old method there to
> support old dtb.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <[email protected]>
> ---
> changes since V1:
> add old dtb support.
> drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> index b2ff423..518386c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
> @@ -290,20 +291,32 @@ static void imx6q_opp_check_speed_grading(struct device *dev)
> #define OCOTP_CFG3_6ULL_SPEED_792MHZ 0x2
> #define OCOTP_CFG3_6ULL_SPEED_900MHZ 0x3
>
> -static void imx6ul_opp_check_speed_grading(struct device *dev)
> +static int imx6ul_opp_check_speed_grading(struct device *dev)
> {
> - struct device_node *np;
> - void __iomem *base;
> u32 val;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> - np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,imx6ul-ocotp");
> - if (!np)
> - return;
> + if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "nvmem-cells", NULL)) {
> + ret = nvmem_cell_read_u32(dev, "speed_grade", &val);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + } else {
> + struct device_node *np;
> + void __iomem *base;
> +
> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,imx6ul-ocotp");
> + if (!np)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> + if (!base) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to map ocotp\n");
> + of_node_put(np);
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
>
> - base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> - if (!base) {
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to map ocotp\n");
> - goto put_node;
> + val = readl_relaxed(base + OCOTP_CFG3);
> + iounmap(base);
Don't you need to put the node np here ?
--
viresh
Hi, Viresh
Anson Huang
Best Regards!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, October 1, 2018 1:58 PM
> To: Anson Huang <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; dl-linux-imx
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] cpufreq: imx6q: read OCOTP through nvmem for
> imx6ul/imx6ull
>
> On 17-09-18, 11:17, Anson Huang wrote:
> > On i.MX6UL/i.MX6ULL, accessing OCOTP directly is wrong because the
> > ocotp clock needs to be enabled first. Add support for reading OCOTP
> > through the nvmem API, and keep the old method there to support old
> > dtb.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > changes since V1:
> > add old dtb support.
> > drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 52
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> > b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c index b2ff423..518386c4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> > #include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
> > #include <linux/err.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h>
> > #include <linux/of.h>
> > #include <linux/of_address.h>
> > #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
> > @@ -290,20 +291,32 @@ static void
> imx6q_opp_check_speed_grading(struct device *dev)
> > #define OCOTP_CFG3_6ULL_SPEED_792MHZ 0x2
> > #define OCOTP_CFG3_6ULL_SPEED_900MHZ 0x3
> >
> > -static void imx6ul_opp_check_speed_grading(struct device *dev)
> > +static int imx6ul_opp_check_speed_grading(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > - struct device_node *np;
> > - void __iomem *base;
> > u32 val;
> > + int ret = 0;
> >
> > - np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,imx6ul-ocotp");
> > - if (!np)
> > - return;
> > + if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "nvmem-cells", NULL)) {
> > + ret = nvmem_cell_read_u32(dev, "speed_grade", &val);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + } else {
> > + struct device_node *np;
> > + void __iomem *base;
> > +
> > + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,imx6ul-ocotp");
> > + if (!np)
> > + return -ENOENT;
> > +
> > + base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> > + if (!base) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "failed to map ocotp\n");
> > + of_node_put(np);
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > + }
> >
> > - base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> > - if (!base) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "failed to map ocotp\n");
> > - goto put_node;
> > + val = readl_relaxed(base + OCOTP_CFG3);
> > + iounmap(base);
>
> Don't you need to put the node np here ?
Correct, I should put the node here as well, please help review V3 patch, thanks.
Anson.
>
> --
> viresh