2018-10-26 20:55:20

by Aaro Koskinen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [REGRESSION] OCTEON MMC driver failure with v4.19

Hi,

OCTEON (MIPS64) MMC driver probe fails with v4.19, because with

commit 6c2fb2ea76361da9b420a8e23a2a19e7842cbdda
Author: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
Date: Mon Jul 23 23:16:09 2018 +0100

of/device: Set bus DMA mask as appropriate

we now get a default 32-bit bus DMA mask, and the device itself has
64-bit mask, so it gets rejected.

With the current mainline, the driver is again working (probably
because of b4ebe6063204 ("dma-direct: implement complete bus_dma_mask
handling")). But I think this is just because I happen to have < 4 GB RAM,
and it probably could still fail on bigger systems..?

A.


2018-11-05 22:08:38

by Aaro Koskinen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] OCTEON MMC driver failure with v4.19

Hi,

On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:54:23PM +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> OCTEON (MIPS64) MMC driver probe fails with v4.19, because with
>
> commit 6c2fb2ea76361da9b420a8e23a2a19e7842cbdda
> Author: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon Jul 23 23:16:09 2018 +0100
>
> of/device: Set bus DMA mask as appropriate
>
> we now get a default 32-bit bus DMA mask, and the device itself has
> 64-bit mask, so it gets rejected.
>
> With the current mainline, the driver is again working (probably
> because of b4ebe6063204 ("dma-direct: implement complete bus_dma_mask
> handling")). But I think this is just because I happen to have < 4 GB RAM,
> and it probably could still fail on bigger systems..?

With the below change, the MMC card probe seems to with v4.19. But it
feels a bit hackish, don't you think... Is there some obvious simple
fix that I'm missing? Any comments?

diff --git a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-platform.c b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-platform.c
index 807cadaf554e..31fab09fadcc 100644
--- a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-platform.c
+++ b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-platform.c
@@ -1067,8 +1067,29 @@ int __init octeon_prune_device_tree(void)
return 0;
}

+static int octeon_device_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb,
+ unsigned long event, void *dev)
+{
+ struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
+
+ if (event != BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE ||
+ !pdev || !pdev->dev.dma_mask || !pdev->dev.of_node)
+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+ if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node,
+ "cavium,octeon-6130-mmc"))
+ *pdev->dev.dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
+
+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
+}
+
+static struct notifier_block platform_nb = {
+ .notifier_call = octeon_device_notifier_call,
+};
+
static int __init octeon_publish_devices(void)
{
+ bus_register_notifier(&platform_bus_type, &platform_nb);
return of_platform_populate(NULL, octeon_ids, NULL, NULL);
}
arch_initcall(octeon_publish_devices);

A.

2018-11-06 06:28:41

by Christoph Hellwig

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] OCTEON MMC driver failure with v4.19

On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 12:06:32AM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> With the below change, the MMC card probe seems to with v4.19. But it
> feels a bit hackish, don't you think... Is there some obvious simple
> fix that I'm missing? Any comments?

Please just use dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent in the platform drivers
instead.

2018-11-06 09:06:25

by Aaro Koskinen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] OCTEON MMC driver failure with v4.19

Hi,

On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 07:27:24AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 12:06:32AM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> > With the below change, the MMC card probe seems to with v4.19. But it
> > feels a bit hackish, don't you think... Is there some obvious simple
> > fix that I'm missing? Any comments?
>
> Please just use dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent in the platform drivers
> instead.

Tried, but that doesn't help with v4.19:

[ 1.290698] octeon_mmc 1180000002000.mmc: dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(): -5
[ 1.297825] octeon_mmc: probe of 1180000002000.mmc failed with error -5

A.

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/cavium-octeon.c b/drivers/mmc/host/cavium-octeon.c
index 22aded1065ae..f7ce26ba6936 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/cavium-octeon.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/cavium-octeon.c
@@ -232,7 +232,8 @@ static int octeon_mmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
*/
host->reg_off_dma = -0x20;

- ret = dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
+ ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(): %d", ret);
if (ret)
return ret;


2018-11-06 21:54:55

by Aaro Koskinen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] OCTEON MMC driver failure with v4.19

Hi,

On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 11:05:11AM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 07:27:24AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 12:06:32AM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> > > With the below change, the MMC card probe seems to with v4.19. But it
> > > feels a bit hackish, don't you think... Is there some obvious simple
> > > fix that I'm missing? Any comments?
> >
> > Please just use dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent in the platform drivers
> > instead.
>
> Tried, but that doesn't help with v4.19:
>
> [ 1.290698] octeon_mmc 1180000002000.mmc: dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(): -5
> [ 1.297825] octeon_mmc: probe of 1180000002000.mmc failed with error -5
>
> A.

Just for the archives, the fix is: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10670177/

A.