2018-10-31 14:45:47

by Shayenne Moura

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] drm: Remove 80-column line in drm_mode_object.c

Add a new variable to make the drm_mode_object comparison before
idr_alloc and decrease line size.

Signed-off-by: Shayenne da Luz Moura <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c
index be8b754eaf60..4b9eafddb409 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c
@@ -36,9 +36,10 @@ int __drm_mode_object_add(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_mode_object *obj,
void (*obj_free_cb)(struct kref *kref))
{
int ret;
+ struct drm_mode_object *obj_tmp = register_obj ? obj : NULL;

mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.idr_mutex);
- ret = idr_alloc(&dev->mode_config.crtc_idr, register_obj ? obj : NULL, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
+ ret = idr_alloc(&dev->mode_config.crtc_idr, obj_tmp, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
if (ret >= 0) {
/*
* Set up the object linking under the protection of the idr
--
2.19.1



2018-10-31 15:14:59

by Jani Nikula

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Remove 80-column line in drm_mode_object.c

On Wed, 31 Oct 2018, Shayenne da Luz Moura <[email protected]> wrote:
> Add a new variable to make the drm_mode_object comparison before
> idr_alloc and decrease line size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shayenne da Luz Moura <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c
> index be8b754eaf60..4b9eafddb409 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c
> @@ -36,9 +36,10 @@ int __drm_mode_object_add(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_mode_object *obj,
> void (*obj_free_cb)(struct kref *kref))
> {
> int ret;
> + struct drm_mode_object *obj_tmp = register_obj ? obj : NULL;
>
> mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.idr_mutex);
> - ret = idr_alloc(&dev->mode_config.crtc_idr, register_obj ? obj : NULL, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> + ret = idr_alloc(&dev->mode_config.crtc_idr, obj_tmp, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL);

Please don't send checkpatch "fixes" to adhere to the 80-column rule. Or
at least use --max-line-length=100 or something to look for worse
offenders than this.

And if you insist, please just add a newline and proper indentation
after "NULL," instead of adding a temporary variable.


BR,
Jani.

> if (ret >= 0) {
> /*
> * Set up the object linking under the protection of the idr

--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

2018-10-31 15:26:47

by Daniel Vetter

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] Re: [PATCH] drm: Remove 80-column line in drm_mode_object.c

On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 4:13 PM Jani Nikula <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2018, Shayenne da Luz Moura <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Add a new variable to make the drm_mode_object comparison before
> > idr_alloc and decrease line size.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shayenne da Luz Moura <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c
> > index be8b754eaf60..4b9eafddb409 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c
> > @@ -36,9 +36,10 @@ int __drm_mode_object_add(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_mode_object *obj,
> > void (*obj_free_cb)(struct kref *kref))
> > {
> > int ret;
> > + struct drm_mode_object *obj_tmp = register_obj ? obj : NULL;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.idr_mutex);
> > - ret = idr_alloc(&dev->mode_config.crtc_idr, register_obj ? obj : NULL, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + ret = idr_alloc(&dev->mode_config.crtc_idr, obj_tmp, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Please don't send checkpatch "fixes" to adhere to the 80-column rule. Or
> at least use --max-line-length=100 or something to look for worse
> offenders than this.
>
> And if you insist, please just add a newline and proper indentation
> after "NULL," instead of adding a temporary variable.

Breaking the line after NULL, seems reasonable, I'd be happy to merge that.
-Daniel

>
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
> > if (ret >= 0) {
> > /*
> > * Set up the object linking under the protection of the idr
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/87a7mudu8t.fsf%40intel.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

2018-10-31 17:38:09

by Shayenne Moura

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] Re: [PATCH] drm: Remove 80-column line in drm_mode_object.c

On 10/31, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 4:13 PM Jani Nikula <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 31 Oct 2018, Shayenne da Luz Moura <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Add a new variable to make the drm_mode_object comparison before
> > > idr_alloc and decrease line size.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shayenne da Luz Moura <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c | 3 ++-
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c
> > > index be8b754eaf60..4b9eafddb409 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c
> > > @@ -36,9 +36,10 @@ int __drm_mode_object_add(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_mode_object *obj,
> > > void (*obj_free_cb)(struct kref *kref))
> > > {
> > > int ret;
> > > + struct drm_mode_object *obj_tmp = register_obj ? obj : NULL;
> > >
> > > mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.idr_mutex);
> > > - ret = idr_alloc(&dev->mode_config.crtc_idr, register_obj ? obj : NULL, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + ret = idr_alloc(&dev->mode_config.crtc_idr, obj_tmp, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > Please don't send checkpatch "fixes" to adhere to the 80-column rule. Or
> > at least use --max-line-length=100 or something to look for worse
> > offenders than this.
> >
> > And if you insist, please just add a newline and proper indentation
> > after "NULL," instead of adding a temporary variable.
>
> Breaking the line after NULL, seems reasonable, I'd be happy to merge that.
> -Daniel

Okay, I will send a new version.

Thank you!