2018-11-20 11:18:13

by Phil Edworthy

Subject: [PATCH] gpio: dwapb: Correct the DT node name in the example

The sub-nodes should not be called gpio-controller, but simply gpio.

Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/snps-dwapb-gpio.txt | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/snps-dwapb-gpio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/snps-dwapb-gpio.txt
index 7276b50c3506..839dd32ffe11 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/snps-dwapb-gpio.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/snps-dwapb-gpio.txt
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ gpio: gpio@20000 {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;

- porta: gpio-controller@0 {
+ porta: gpio@0 {
compatible = "snps,dw-apb-gpio-port";
gpio-controller;
#gpio-cells = <2>;
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ gpio: gpio@20000 {
interrupts = <0>;
};

- portb: gpio-controller@1 {
+ portb: gpio@1 {
compatible = "snps,dw-apb-gpio-port";
gpio-controller;
#gpio-cells = <2>;
--
2.17.1

2018-11-26 08:45:10

by Linus Walleij

Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: dwapb: Correct the DT node name in the example

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:17 PM Phil Edworthy
<[email protected]> wrote:

> The sub-nodes should not be called gpio-controller, but simply gpio.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <[email protected]>

Patch applied.

Yours,
Linus Walleij