2018-12-07 19:13:58

by Helen Koike

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] configfs: fix wrong name of struct in documentation

The name of the struct is configfs_bin_attribute instead of
configfs_attribute

Signed-off-by: Helen Koike <[email protected]>

---

Documentation/filesystems/configfs/configfs.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/configfs/configfs.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/configfs/configfs.txt
index 3828e85345ae..16e606c11f40 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/configfs/configfs.txt
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/configfs/configfs.txt
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ be called whenever userspace asks for a write(2) on the attribute.

[struct configfs_bin_attribute]

- struct configfs_attribute {
+ struct configfs_bin_attribute {
struct configfs_attribute cb_attr;
void *cb_private;
size_t cb_max_size;
--
2.19.1



2018-12-20 21:10:52

by Jonathan Corbet

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] configfs: fix wrong name of struct in documentation

On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 17:11:58 -0200
Helen Koike <[email protected]> wrote:

> The name of the struct is configfs_bin_attribute instead of
> configfs_attribute
>
> Signed-off-by: Helen Koike <[email protected]>
>
> ---
>
> Documentation/filesystems/configfs/configfs.txt | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/configfs/configfs.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/configfs/configfs.txt
> index 3828e85345ae..16e606c11f40 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/configfs/configfs.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/configfs/configfs.txt
> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ be called whenever userspace asks for a write(2) on the attribute.
>
> [struct configfs_bin_attribute]
>
> - struct configfs_attribute {
> + struct configfs_bin_attribute {
> struct configfs_attribute cb_attr;
> void *cb_private;
> size_t cb_max_size;

The document is clearly wrong, and this patch makes it better, so I've
applied it - thanks!

That said, the structure appears to have grown some fields that are not
reflected in the document; I suspect that there's much more in there that
is somewhat fictional at this point. Hopefully somebody someday can help
to fix it up.

Thanks,

jon