2018-12-21 18:52:41

by Marc Gonzalez

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v1] phy: qcom-ufs: Use iopoll.h readl_poll_timeout macro

The private copy of readl_poll_timeout is no longer needed.
Use the implementation in iopoll.h instead.

Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <[email protected]>
---
drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-ufs-i.h | 19 +------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-ufs-i.h b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-ufs-i.h
index 681644e43248..f798fb64de94 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-ufs-i.h
+++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-ufs-i.h
@@ -23,24 +23,7 @@
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
-
-#define readl_poll_timeout(addr, val, cond, sleep_us, timeout_us) \
-({ \
- ktime_t timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), timeout_us); \
- might_sleep_if(timeout_us); \
- for (;;) { \
- (val) = readl(addr); \
- if (cond) \
- break; \
- if (timeout_us && ktime_compare(ktime_get(), timeout) > 0) { \
- (val) = readl(addr); \
- break; \
- } \
- if (sleep_us) \
- usleep_range(DIV_ROUND_UP(sleep_us, 4), sleep_us); \
- } \
- (cond) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT; \
-})
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>

#define UFS_QCOM_PHY_CAL_ENTRY(reg, val) \
{ \
--
2.17.1


2018-12-27 18:15:41

by Bjorn Andersson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] phy: qcom-ufs: Use iopoll.h readl_poll_timeout macro

On Fri 21 Dec 02:13 PST 2018, Marc Gonzalez wrote:

> The private copy of readl_poll_timeout is no longer needed.
> Use the implementation in iopoll.h instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>

Regards,
Bjorn

> ---
> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-ufs-i.h | 19 +------------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-ufs-i.h b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-ufs-i.h
> index 681644e43248..f798fb64de94 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-ufs-i.h
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-ufs-i.h
> @@ -23,24 +23,7 @@
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> -
> -#define readl_poll_timeout(addr, val, cond, sleep_us, timeout_us) \
> -({ \
> - ktime_t timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), timeout_us); \
> - might_sleep_if(timeout_us); \
> - for (;;) { \
> - (val) = readl(addr); \
> - if (cond) \
> - break; \
> - if (timeout_us && ktime_compare(ktime_get(), timeout) > 0) { \
> - (val) = readl(addr); \
> - break; \
> - } \
> - if (sleep_us) \
> - usleep_range(DIV_ROUND_UP(sleep_us, 4), sleep_us); \
> - } \
> - (cond) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT; \
> -})
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
>
> #define UFS_QCOM_PHY_CAL_ENTRY(reg, val) \
> { \
> --
> 2.17.1

2018-12-29 05:11:32

by Andy Gross

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] phy: qcom-ufs: Use iopoll.h readl_poll_timeout macro

On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 11:13:18AM +0100, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> The private copy of readl_poll_timeout is no longer needed.
> Use the implementation in iopoll.h instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Andy Gross <[email protected]>

2019-01-02 07:41:50

by Vivek Gautam

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] phy: qcom-ufs: Use iopoll.h readl_poll_timeout macro

On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 9:43 PM Marc Gonzalez <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The private copy of readl_poll_timeout is no longer needed.
> Use the implementation in iopoll.h instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-ufs-i.h | 19 +------------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-ufs-i.h b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-ufs-i.h
> index 681644e43248..f798fb64de94 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-ufs-i.h
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-ufs-i.h
> @@ -23,24 +23,7 @@
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> -
> -#define readl_poll_timeout(addr, val, cond, sleep_us, timeout_us) \
> -({ \
> - ktime_t timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), timeout_us); \
> - might_sleep_if(timeout_us); \
> - for (;;) { \
> - (val) = readl(addr); \
> - if (cond) \
> - break; \
> - if (timeout_us && ktime_compare(ktime_get(), timeout) > 0) { \
> - (val) = readl(addr); \
> - break; \
> - } \
> - if (sleep_us) \
> - usleep_range(DIV_ROUND_UP(sleep_us, 4), sleep_us); \
> - } \
> - (cond) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT; \
> -})
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
>
> #define UFS_QCOM_PHY_CAL_ENTRY(reg, val) \
> { \
> --
> 2.17.1

Thanks for the patch. LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Vivek Gautam <[email protected]>

Best regards
Vivek

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

2019-01-16 18:33:18

by Marc Gonzalez

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] phy: qcom-ufs: Use iopoll.h readl_poll_timeout macro

On 28/12/2018 17:05, Andy Gross wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 11:13:18AM +0100, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>
>> The private copy of readl_poll_timeout is no longer needed.
>> Use the implementation in iopoll.h instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <[email protected]>
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Gross <[email protected]>

Would this patch go through your tree or Kishon's tree?

Regards.

2019-01-16 18:37:09

by Kishon Vijay Abraham I

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] phy: qcom-ufs: Use iopoll.h readl_poll_timeout macro

Hi,

On 16/01/19 2:40 PM, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> On 28/12/2018 17:05, Andy Gross wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 11:13:18AM +0100, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>>
>>> The private copy of readl_poll_timeout is no longer needed.
>>> Use the implementation in iopoll.h instead.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <[email protected]>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Andy Gross <[email protected]>
>
> Would this patch go through your tree or Kishon's tree?

I've merged this in phy -next.

Thanks
Kishon

2019-01-16 19:14:34

by Marc Gonzalez

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] phy: qcom-ufs: Use iopoll.h readl_poll_timeout macro

On 16/01/2019 10:24, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:

> On 16/01/19 2:40 PM, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>
>> Would this patch go through your tree or Kishon's tree?
>
> I've merged this in phy -next.

Thanks Kishon.

Do you mean here?

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kishon/linux-phy.git/log/?h=next

Regards.

2019-01-16 21:41:44

by Kishon Vijay Abraham I

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] phy: qcom-ufs: Use iopoll.h readl_poll_timeout macro

Hi,

On 16/01/19 4:00 PM, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> On 16/01/2019 10:24, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>
>> On 16/01/19 2:40 PM, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>>
>>> Would this patch go through your tree or Kishon's tree?
>>
>> I've merged this in phy -next.
>
> Thanks Kishon.
>
> Do you mean here?
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kishon/linux-phy.git/log/?h=next

yes.

Thanks
Kishon