2019-02-03 11:50:34

by Abel Vesa

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] soc: imx: Add generic i.MX8 SoC driver

Add generic i.MX8 SoC driver along with the i.MX8MQ SoC specific code.

Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <[email protected]>
---
drivers/soc/imx/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx8.c | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx8.c

diff --git a/drivers/soc/imx/Makefile b/drivers/soc/imx/Makefile
index 506a6f3..d6b529e0 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/imx/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/soc/imx/Makefile
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_IMX_GPC) += gpc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_IMX_GPCV2_PM_DOMAINS) += gpcv2.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += soc-imx8.o
diff --git a/drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx8.c b/drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx8.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..69fe04e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx8.c
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright 2019 NXP.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/sys_soc.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+
+#define ANADIG_DIGPROG 0x6c
+
+struct imx8_soc_data {
+ char *name;
+ u32 (*soc_revision)(void);
+};
+
+static u32 __init imx_init_revision_from_anatop(void)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+ void __iomem *anatop_base;
+ u32 digprog;
+
+ np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,imx8mq-anatop");
+ anatop_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
+ WARN_ON(!anatop_base);
+ digprog = readl_relaxed(anatop_base + ANADIG_DIGPROG);
+ iounmap(anatop_base);
+
+ /*
+ * Bit[7:4] is the base layer revision,
+ * Bit[3:0] is the metal layer revision
+ * e.g. 0x10 stands for Tapeout 1.0
+ */
+ return digprog & 0xff;
+}
+
+u32 imx8mq_soc_revision(void)
+{
+ return imx_init_revision_from_anatop();
+}
+
+struct imx8_soc_data imx8mq_soc_data = {
+ .name = "i.MX8MQ",
+ .soc_revision = imx8mq_soc_revision,
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id imx8_soc_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "fsl,imx8mq", .data = &imx8mq_soc_data, },
+ { }
+};
+
+static int __init imx8_soc_init(void)
+{
+ struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
+ struct soc_device *soc_dev;
+ struct device_node *root;
+ const struct of_device_id *id;
+ u32 soc_rev = 0;
+ const struct imx8_soc_data *data;
+ int ret;
+
+ soc_dev_attr = kzalloc(sizeof(*soc_dev_attr), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!soc_dev_attr)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ soc_dev_attr->family = "Freescale i.MX";
+
+ root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
+ ret = of_property_read_string(root, "model", &soc_dev_attr->machine);
+ if (ret)
+ goto free_soc;
+
+ id = of_match_node(imx8_soc_match, root);
+ if (!id)
+ goto free_soc;
+
+ of_node_put(root);
+
+ data = id->data;
+ if (data) {
+ soc_dev_attr->soc_id = data->name;
+ if (data->soc_revision)
+ soc_rev = data->soc_revision();
+ }
+
+ soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%d.%d",
+ (soc_rev >> 4) & 0xf,
+ soc_rev & 0xf);
+ if (!soc_dev_attr->revision)
+ goto free_soc;
+
+ soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
+ if (IS_ERR(soc_dev))
+ goto free_rev;
+
+ return 0;
+
+free_rev:
+ kfree(soc_dev_attr->revision);
+free_soc:
+ kfree(soc_dev_attr);
+ return -ENODEV;
+}
+device_initcall(imx8_soc_init);
--
2.7.4



2019-02-25 08:00:28

by Chris Spencer

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: imx: Add generic i.MX8 SoC driver

On Sun, 3 Feb 2019 at 11:50, Abel Vesa <[email protected]> wrote:
> Add generic i.MX8 SoC driver along with the i.MX8MQ SoC specific code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <[email protected]>

Tested-by: Chris Spencer <[email protected]>

My patch series which adds support for the i.MX8MQ to the CAAM driver
[1] needs the SoC driver, so it would be good to get this one in.

Thanks,
Chris

[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg36947.html

2019-02-25 09:31:57

by Abel Vesa

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: imx: Add generic i.MX8 SoC driver

On 19-02-25 07:57:22, Chris Spencer wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Feb 2019 at 11:50, Abel Vesa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Add generic i.MX8 SoC driver along with the i.MX8MQ SoC specific code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <[email protected]>
>
> Tested-by: Chris Spencer <[email protected]>
>

I don't get it, in the RFC you said you didn't have the boards to test.
How did you test it then ?

> My patch series which adds support for the i.MX8MQ to the CAAM driver
> [1] needs the SoC driver, so it would be good to get this one in.
>

The SoC driver needs a little bit of rework because of the way the
revisions are detected. I'll resend this in the next couple of days.

> Thanks,
> Chris
>

2019-02-25 09:47:43

by Chris Spencer

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: imx: Add generic i.MX8 SoC driver

On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 09:31, Abel Vesa <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't get it, in the RFC you said you didn't have the boards to test.
> How did you test it then ?

I have the i.MX8MQ-EVK. I have tested it on that, but I can't test it
on anything else using that driver (i.MX6, Layerscape).

> The SoC driver needs a little bit of rework because of the way the
> revisions are detected. I'll resend this in the next couple of days.

Ok thanks.

Chris

2019-02-25 11:33:53

by Stefan Agner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: imx: Add generic i.MX8 SoC driver

On 03.02.2019 12:49, Abel Vesa wrote:
> Add generic i.MX8 SoC driver along with the i.MX8MQ SoC specific code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/soc/imx/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx8.c | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx8.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/imx/Makefile b/drivers/soc/imx/Makefile
> index 506a6f3..d6b529e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/imx/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/soc/imx/Makefile
> @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
> obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_IMX_GPC) += gpc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_IMX_GPCV2_PM_DOMAINS) += gpcv2.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += soc-imx8.o
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx8.c b/drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx8.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..69fe04e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx8.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2019 NXP.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/sys_soc.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +
> +#define ANADIG_DIGPROG 0x6c
> +
> +struct imx8_soc_data {
> + char *name;
> + u32 (*soc_revision)(void);
> +};
> +
> +static u32 __init imx_init_revision_from_anatop(void)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np;
> + void __iomem *anatop_base;
> + u32 digprog;
> +
> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,imx8mq-anatop");
> + anatop_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> + WARN_ON(!anatop_base);
> + digprog = readl_relaxed(anatop_base + ANADIG_DIGPROG);
> + iounmap(anatop_base);
> +
> + /*
> + * Bit[7:4] is the base layer revision,
> + * Bit[3:0] is the metal layer revision
> + * e.g. 0x10 stands for Tapeout 1.0
> + */
> + return digprog & 0xff;
> +}
> +
> +u32 imx8mq_soc_revision(void)

Since imx_init_revision_from_anatop is __init, you should make this
__init too.

> +{
> + return imx_init_revision_from_anatop();
> +}
> +
> +struct imx8_soc_data imx8mq_soc_data = {
> + .name = "i.MX8MQ",
> + .soc_revision = imx8mq_soc_revision,
> +};

Can we make this const?

> +
> +static const struct of_device_id imx8_soc_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "fsl,imx8mq", .data = &imx8mq_soc_data, },
> + { }
> +};
> +
> +static int __init imx8_soc_init(void)
> +{
> + struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
> + struct soc_device *soc_dev;
> + struct device_node *root;
> + const struct of_device_id *id;
> + u32 soc_rev = 0;
> + const struct imx8_soc_data *data;
> + int ret;
> +
> + soc_dev_attr = kzalloc(sizeof(*soc_dev_attr), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!soc_dev_attr)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + soc_dev_attr->family = "Freescale i.MX";
> +
> + root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
> + ret = of_property_read_string(root, "model", &soc_dev_attr->machine);
> + if (ret)
> + goto free_soc;
> +
> + id = of_match_node(imx8_soc_match, root);
> + if (!id)
> + goto free_soc;

In this and the error case above you also need to make sure to call
of_node_put.

--
Stefan

> +
> + of_node_put(root);
> +
> + data = id->data;
> + if (data) {
> + soc_dev_attr->soc_id = data->name;
> + if (data->soc_revision)
> + soc_rev = data->soc_revision();
> + }
> +
> + soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%d.%d",
> + (soc_rev >> 4) & 0xf,
> + soc_rev & 0xf);
> + if (!soc_dev_attr->revision)
> + goto free_soc;
> +
> + soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
> + if (IS_ERR(soc_dev))
> + goto free_rev;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +free_rev:
> + kfree(soc_dev_attr->revision);
> +free_soc:
> + kfree(soc_dev_attr);
> + return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +device_initcall(imx8_soc_init);