Bcc:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/24] Include linux ACPI docs into Sphinx TOC tree
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
+ Bjorn
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 01:36:13PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:25:23 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > There are ACPI-related documents currently in Documentation/acpi/ that
> > don't clearly fall under either driver-api or admin-guide. For
> > example, some of them describe various aspects of the ACPI support
> > subsystem operation and some document expectations with respect to the
> > ACPI tables provided by the firmware etc.
> >
> > Where would you recommend to put them after converting to .rst?
>
> OK, I've done some pondering on this. Maybe what we need is a new
> top-level "hardware guide" book meant to hold information on how the
> hardware works and what the kernel's expectations are. Architecture
> information could maybe go there too. Would this make sense?
>
> If so, I could see a division like this:
>
> Hardware guide
> acpi-lid
> aml-debugger (or maybe driver api?)
> debug (ditto)
> DSD-properties-rules
> gpio-properties
> i2c-muxes
>
> Admin guide
> cppc_sysfs
> initrd_table_override
>
> Driver-API
> enumeration
> scan_handlers
>
> other:
> dsdt-override: find another home for those five lines
>
Then, should we create dedicated sub-directories for these new charpters and
move documents to coresspoding one? Now we have 'admin-guide' and all admin-guid
docs are under it, otherwise we will have reference across different folders.
For example, the 'admin-guide/index.rst' will have:
...
../acpi/osi
...
Which seems not good.
> ...and so on. I've probably gotten at least one of those wrong, but that's
> the idea.
>
> Of course, then it would be nice to better integrate those documents so
> that they fit into a single coherent whole...a guy can dream...:)
>
I am not an adminstrator, so I don't know how adminstrators use this kernel
documentation. But as a kernel developer, I prefer all related documents
integrated into one charpter. Because I probably miss some useful sections
if the documents are distributed into several charpters. And this is usually
how a book is written (One charpter focus on one topic and has sub-sections
such as overview, backgroud knowledge, implemenation details..),
but a book mostly target on hypothetical readers...
> Thanks,
>
> jon
--
Cheers,
Changbin Du