Support more sample rate in asrc
Shengjiu Wang (3):
ASoC: fsl_asrc: Fix the issue about unsupported rate
ASoC: fsl_asrc: replace the process_option table with function
ASoC: fsl_asrc: Unify the supported input and output rate
Changes in v5
- fix the [1/24, 8]
- move fsl_asrc_sel_proc before setting
Changes in v4
- add patch to Fix the [8kHz, 30kHz] open set issue.
Changes in v3
- remove FSL_ASRC_RATES
- refine fsl_asrc_sel_proc according to comments
Changes in v2
- add more comments in code
- add commit "Unify the supported input and output rate"
sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
--
1.9.1
When the output sample rate is [8kHz, 30kHz], the limitation
of the supported ratio range is (1/24, 8). In the driver
we use (8kHz, 30kHz) instead of [8kHz, 30kHz].
So this patch is to fix this issue and the potential rounding
issue with divider.
Fixes: fff6e03c7b65 ("ASoC: fsl_asrc: add support for 8-30kHz
output sample rate")
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <[email protected]>
---
sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
index 0b937924d2e4..ea035c12a325 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
@@ -282,8 +282,8 @@ static int fsl_asrc_config_pair(struct fsl_asrc_pair *pair)
return -EINVAL;
}
- if ((outrate > 8000 && outrate < 30000) &&
- (outrate/inrate > 24 || inrate/outrate > 8)) {
+ if ((outrate >= 8000 && outrate <= 30000) &&
+ (outrate > 24 * inrate || inrate > 8 * outrate)) {
pair_err("exceed supported ratio range [1/24, 8] for \
inrate/outrate: %d/%d\n", inrate, outrate);
return -EINVAL;
--
1.9.1
Unify the supported input and output rate, add the
12kHz/24kHz/128kHz to the support list
Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <[email protected]>
---
sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
index 4675ea4e8204..85c278effda1 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
@@ -27,13 +27,14 @@
dev_dbg(&asrc_priv->pdev->dev, "Pair %c: " fmt, 'A' + index, ##__VA_ARGS__)
/* Corresponding to process_option */
-static int supported_input_rate[] = {
- 5512, 8000, 11025, 16000, 22050, 32000, 44100, 48000, 64000, 88200,
- 96000, 176400, 192000,
+static unsigned int supported_asrc_rate[] = {
+ 5512, 8000, 11025, 12000, 16000, 22050, 24000, 32000, 44100, 48000,
+ 64000, 88200, 96000, 128000, 176400, 192000,
};
-static int supported_asrc_rate[] = {
- 8000, 11025, 16000, 22050, 32000, 44100, 48000, 64000, 88200, 96000, 176400, 192000,
+static struct snd_pcm_hw_constraint_list fsl_asrc_rate_constraints = {
+ .count = ARRAY_SIZE(supported_asrc_rate),
+ .list = supported_asrc_rate,
};
/**
@@ -292,11 +293,11 @@ static int fsl_asrc_config_pair(struct fsl_asrc_pair *pair)
ideal = config->inclk == INCLK_NONE;
/* Validate input and output sample rates */
- for (in = 0; in < ARRAY_SIZE(supported_input_rate); in++)
- if (inrate == supported_input_rate[in])
+ for (in = 0; in < ARRAY_SIZE(supported_asrc_rate); in++)
+ if (inrate == supported_asrc_rate[in])
break;
- if (in == ARRAY_SIZE(supported_input_rate)) {
+ if (in == ARRAY_SIZE(supported_asrc_rate)) {
pair_err("unsupported input sample rate: %dHz\n", inrate);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -310,7 +311,7 @@ static int fsl_asrc_config_pair(struct fsl_asrc_pair *pair)
return -EINVAL;
}
- if ((outrate >= 8000 && outrate <= 30000) &&
+ if ((outrate >= 5512 && outrate <= 30000) &&
(outrate > 24 * inrate || inrate > 8 * outrate)) {
pair_err("exceed supported ratio range [1/24, 8] for \
inrate/outrate: %d/%d\n", inrate, outrate);
@@ -485,7 +486,9 @@ static int fsl_asrc_dai_startup(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
snd_pcm_hw_constraint_step(substream->runtime, 0,
SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_CHANNELS, 2);
- return 0;
+
+ return snd_pcm_hw_constraint_list(substream->runtime, 0,
+ SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_RATE, &fsl_asrc_rate_constraints);
}
static int fsl_asrc_dai_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
@@ -598,7 +601,6 @@ static int fsl_asrc_dai_probe(struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
return 0;
}
-#define FSL_ASRC_RATES SNDRV_PCM_RATE_8000_192000
#define FSL_ASRC_FORMATS (SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_LE | \
SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_LE | \
SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S20_3LE)
@@ -609,14 +611,18 @@ static int fsl_asrc_dai_probe(struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
.stream_name = "ASRC-Playback",
.channels_min = 1,
.channels_max = 10,
- .rates = FSL_ASRC_RATES,
+ .rate_min = 5512,
+ .rate_max = 192000,
+ .rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_KNOT,
.formats = FSL_ASRC_FORMATS,
},
.capture = {
.stream_name = "ASRC-Capture",
.channels_min = 1,
.channels_max = 10,
- .rates = FSL_ASRC_RATES,
+ .rate_min = 5512,
+ .rate_max = 192000,
+ .rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_KNOT,
.formats = FSL_ASRC_FORMATS,
},
.ops = &fsl_asrc_dai_ops,
--
1.9.1
When we want to support more sample rate, for example 12kHz/24kHz
we need update the process_option table, if we want to support more
sample rate next time, the table need to be updated again. which
is not flexible.
We got a function fsl_asrc_sel_proc to replace the table, which can
give the pre-processing and post-processing options according to
the sample rate.
Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <[email protected]>
---
sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
index ea035c12a325..4675ea4e8204 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
@@ -26,24 +26,6 @@
#define pair_dbg(fmt, ...) \
dev_dbg(&asrc_priv->pdev->dev, "Pair %c: " fmt, 'A' + index, ##__VA_ARGS__)
-/* Sample rates are aligned with that defined in pcm.h file */
-static const u8 process_option[][12][2] = {
- /* 8kHz 11.025kHz 16kHz 22.05kHz 32kHz 44.1kHz 48kHz 64kHz 88.2kHz 96kHz 176kHz 192kHz */
- {{0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0},}, /* 5512Hz */
- {{0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0},}, /* 8kHz */
- {{0, 2}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0},}, /* 11025Hz */
- {{1, 2}, {0, 2}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0},}, /* 16kHz */
- {{1, 2}, {1, 2}, {0, 2}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0},}, /* 22050Hz */
- {{1, 2}, {2, 1}, {2, 1}, {0, 2}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0}, {0, 0}, {0, 0},}, /* 32kHz */
- {{2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 1}, {2, 1}, {0, 2}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0}, {0, 0},}, /* 44.1kHz */
- {{2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 1}, {2, 1}, {0, 2}, {0, 2}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0}, {0, 0},}, /* 48kHz */
- {{2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 1}, {1, 2}, {0, 2}, {0, 2}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 1}, {0, 0},}, /* 64kHz */
- {{2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {1, 2}, {1, 2}, {1, 2}, {1, 1}, {1, 1}, {1, 1}, {1, 1}, {1, 1},}, /* 88.2kHz */
- {{2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {1, 2}, {1, 2}, {1, 2}, {1, 1}, {1, 1}, {1, 1}, {1, 1}, {1, 1},}, /* 96kHz */
- {{2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 1}, {2, 1}, {2, 1}, {2, 1}, {2, 1},}, /* 176kHz */
- {{2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 2}, {2, 1}, {2, 1}, {2, 1}, {2, 1}, {2, 1},}, /* 192kHz */
-};
-
/* Corresponding to process_option */
static int supported_input_rate[] = {
5512, 8000, 11025, 16000, 22050, 32000, 44100, 48000, 64000, 88200,
@@ -80,6 +62,51 @@
static unsigned char *clk_map[2];
/**
+ * Select the pre-processing and post-processing options
+ * Unsupport cases: Tsout > 8.125 * Tsin, Tsout > 16.125 * Tsin
+ *
+ * inrate: input sample rate
+ * outrate: output sample rate
+ * pre_proc: return value for pre-processing option
+ * post_proc: return value for post-processing option
+ */
+static int fsl_asrc_sel_proc(int inrate, int outrate,
+ int *pre_proc, int *post_proc)
+{
+ bool post_proc_cond2;
+ bool post_proc_cond0;
+
+ /* select pre_proc between [0, 2] */
+ if (inrate * 8 > 33 * outrate)
+ *pre_proc = 2;
+ else if (inrate * 8 > 15 * outrate) {
+ if (inrate > 152000)
+ *pre_proc = 2;
+ else
+ *pre_proc = 1;
+ } else if (inrate < 76000)
+ *pre_proc = 0;
+ else if (inrate > 152000)
+ *pre_proc = 2;
+ else
+ *pre_proc = 1;
+
+ /* Condition for selection of post-processing */
+ post_proc_cond2 = (inrate * 15 > outrate * 16 && outrate < 56000) ||
+ (inrate > 56000 && outrate < 56000);
+ post_proc_cond0 = inrate * 23 < outrate * 8;
+
+ if (post_proc_cond2)
+ *post_proc = 2;
+ else if (post_proc_cond0)
+ *post_proc = 0;
+ else
+ *post_proc = 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/**
* Request ASRC pair
*
* It assigns pair by the order of A->C->B because allocation of pair B,
@@ -239,6 +266,7 @@ static int fsl_asrc_config_pair(struct fsl_asrc_pair *pair)
u32 inrate, outrate, indiv, outdiv;
u32 clk_index[2], div[2];
int in, out, channels;
+ int pre_proc, post_proc;
struct clk *clk;
bool ideal;
@@ -377,11 +405,13 @@ static int fsl_asrc_config_pair(struct fsl_asrc_pair *pair)
ASRCTR_IDRi_MASK(index) | ASRCTR_USRi_MASK(index),
ASRCTR_IDR(index) | ASRCTR_USR(index));
+ fsl_asrc_sel_proc(inrate, outrate, &pre_proc, &post_proc);
+
/* Apply configurations for pre- and post-processing */
regmap_update_bits(asrc_priv->regmap, REG_ASRCFG,
ASRCFG_PREMODi_MASK(index) | ASRCFG_POSTMODi_MASK(index),
- ASRCFG_PREMOD(index, process_option[in][out][0]) |
- ASRCFG_POSTMOD(index, process_option[in][out][1]));
+ ASRCFG_PREMOD(index, pre_proc) |
+ ASRCFG_POSTMOD(index, post_proc));
return fsl_asrc_set_ideal_ratio(pair, inrate, outrate);
}
--
1.9.1
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 02:32:32AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> When the output sample rate is [8kHz, 30kHz], the limitation
> of the supported ratio range is (1/24, 8). In the driver
Should be [1/24, 8].
Otherwise,
Acked-by: Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>
Thanks
> we use (8kHz, 30kHz) instead of [8kHz, 30kHz].
> So this patch is to fix this issue and the potential rounding
> issue with divider.
>
> Fixes: fff6e03c7b65 ("ASoC: fsl_asrc: add support for 8-30kHz
> output sample rate")
> Cc: <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <[email protected]>
> ---
> sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
> index 0b937924d2e4..ea035c12a325 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c
> @@ -282,8 +282,8 @@ static int fsl_asrc_config_pair(struct fsl_asrc_pair *pair)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - if ((outrate > 8000 && outrate < 30000) &&
> - (outrate/inrate > 24 || inrate/outrate > 8)) {
> + if ((outrate >= 8000 && outrate <= 30000) &&
> + (outrate > 24 * inrate || inrate > 8 * outrate)) {
> pair_err("exceed supported ratio range [1/24, 8] for \
> inrate/outrate: %d/%d\n", inrate, outrate);
> return -EINVAL;
> --
> 1.9.1
>
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 02:32:35AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> When we want to support more sample rate, for example 12kHz/24kHz
> we need update the process_option table, if we want to support more
> sample rate next time, the table need to be updated again. which
> is not flexible.
>
> We got a function fsl_asrc_sel_proc to replace the table, which can
> give the pre-processing and post-processing options according to
> the sample rate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <[email protected]>
A couple of more small comments.
And please add this when you resend:
Acked-by: Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>
> + * Unsupport cases: Tsout > 8.125 * Tsin, Tsout > 16.125 * Tsin
Since we have a ratio validation somewhere else, it's okay to
drop this line -- it may confuse people since the function no
longer checks these unsupported cases.
> +static int fsl_asrc_sel_proc(int inrate, int outrate,
I think "void" type should be just fine as we made sure there
is no unsupported cases running in this function.
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 02:32:38AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> Unify the supported input and output rate, add the
> 12kHz/24kHz/128kHz to the support list
>
> Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>
Thank you
Hi
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 02:32:35AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> > When we want to support more sample rate, for example 12kHz/24kHz
> we
> > need update the process_option table, if we want to support more
> > sample rate next time, the table need to be updated again. which is
> > not flexible.
> >
> > We got a function fsl_asrc_sel_proc to replace the table, which can
> > give the pre-processing and post-processing options according to the
> > sample rate.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <[email protected]>
>
> A couple of more small comments.
>
> And please add this when you resend:
> Acked-by: Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>
>
> > + * Unsupport cases: Tsout > 8.125 * Tsin, Tsout > 16.125 * Tsin
>
> Since we have a ratio validation somewhere else, it's okay to drop this line -
> - it may confuse people since the function no longer checks these
> unsupported cases.
I add this for may be in the future we forget the limitation. Just for a reminder.
Best regards
Wang shengjiu
>
> > +static int fsl_asrc_sel_proc(int inrate, int outrate,
>
> I think "void" type should be just fine as we made sure there is no
> unsupported cases running in this function.
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 03:15:34AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> Hi
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 02:32:35AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> > > When we want to support more sample rate, for example 12kHz/24kHz
> > we
> > > need update the process_option table, if we want to support more
> > > sample rate next time, the table need to be updated again. which is
> > > not flexible.
> > >
> > > We got a function fsl_asrc_sel_proc to replace the table, which can
> > > give the pre-processing and post-processing options according to the
> > > sample rate.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <[email protected]>
> >
> > A couple of more small comments.
> >
> > And please add this when you resend:
> > Acked-by: Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>
> >
> > > + * Unsupport cases: Tsout > 8.125 * Tsin, Tsout > 16.125 * Tsin
> >
> > Since we have a ratio validation somewhere else, it's okay to drop this line -
> > - it may confuse people since the function no longer checks these
> > unsupported cases.
>
> I add this for may be in the future we forget the limitation. Just for a reminder.
Okay. Let's use something more practical like:
+* Make sure to exclude following unsupported cases before calling the function:
+* 1) outrate > 8.125 * inrate
+* 2) outrate > 16.125 * inrate
Hi
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 03:15:34AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 02:32:35AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> > > > When we want to support more sample rate, for example
> 12kHz/24kHz
> > > we
> > > > need update the process_option table, if we want to support more
> > > > sample rate next time, the table need to be updated again. which
> > > > is not flexible.
> > > >
> > > > We got a function fsl_asrc_sel_proc to replace the table, which
> > > > can give the pre-processing and post-processing options according
> > > > to the sample rate.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > A couple of more small comments.
> > >
> > > And please add this when you resend:
> > > Acked-by: Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > > + * Unsupport cases: Tsout > 8.125 * Tsin, Tsout > 16.125 * Tsin
> > >
> > > Since we have a ratio validation somewhere else, it's okay to drop
> > > this line -
> > > - it may confuse people since the function no longer checks these
> > > unsupported cases.
> >
> > I add this for may be in the future we forget the limitation. Just for a
> reminder.
>
> Okay. Let's use something more practical like:
>
> +* Make sure to exclude following unsupported cases before calling the
> function:
> +* 1) outrate > 8.125 * inrate
> +* 2) outrate > 16.125 * inrate
Ok.